|SUBJECT ||Re: [hangout] Re: NYLXS, NYFairUse
|From owner-hangout-desteny-at-mrbrklyn.com Wed Feb 19 09:51:32 2003
Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mrbrklyn.com (8.12.3/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id h1JEpWjb031528 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 09:51:32 -0500
Received: (from mdom-at-localhost) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h1JEpWAl031527 for hangout-desteny; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 09:51:32 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: www2.mrbrklyn.com: mdom set sender to owner-hangout-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com using -f
Received: from paix.pilosoft.com ([220.127.116.11]) by mrbrklyn.com (8.12.3/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id h1JEpVjb031522 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 09:51:31 -0500
Received: from there ([18.104.22.168]) by paix.pilosoft.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h1JEoUt15522; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 09:50:30 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
To: Marco Scoffier
Subject: Re: [hangout] Re: NYLXS, NYFairUse
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 09:53:44 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2]
References: <200302181801.h1II1Lp20784-at-paix.pilosoft.com> <200302190926.h1J9QUt14640-at-paix.pilosoft.com> <20030219143437.GB4328-at-metm.org>
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mrbrklyn.com id h1JEpWjb031523
List: New Yorkers Linux Scene
Admin: To unsubscribe send unsubscribename-at-domian.com to hangout-request-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com
HOLD ON. I am writing an email response to Jay right now. From information
you put forward, and information Jay may provide to me today, I have
indicated to Jay that I may be calling for a motion to have him reinstated.
HOLD ON. Let me finish the email, then I'll be able to get my thoughts
together and post something on hangout.
You should have been at the meeting. Your voice was missing, one that is
less biased to either side, and has the interests of NYLXS in mind from what
On Wednesday 19 February 2003 09:34, Marco Scoffier wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 04:29:43AM -0500, vin wrote:
> > As to the blocking issue. I don't know if it was initiated by Ruben, or
> > by the board or exactly when, but at this point, it no longer matters. I
> > can accurately say that a vote was taken by board members, and it is
> > officially a board decision to maintain the block.
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Can I ask what could possibly have convinced the board that censorship
> of the opposing arguement was in any way desirable, or could possibly
> help to resolve this issue in any way shape or form?
New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
Fair Use -
because it's either fair use or useless....