MESSAGE
| DATE | 2003-07-21 |
| FROM | David Sugar
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [hangout] SCO Escalates Linux Battle
|
From owner-hangout-desteny-at-mrbrklyn.com Mon Jul 21 18:31:24 2003
Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mrbrklyn.com (8.12.3/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id h6LMVN1B008742
for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 18:31:23 -0400
Received: (from mdom-at-localhost)
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h6LMVN85008741
for hangout-desteny; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 18:31:23 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: www2.mrbrklyn.com: mdom set sender to owner-hangout-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com using -f
Received: from localhost.bayonne.dyndns.org (pool-141-153-208-47.mad.east.verizon.net [141.153.208.47])
by mrbrklyn.com (8.12.3/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id h6LMVM1B008736
for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 18:31:22 -0400
Received: from ostel.com ([192.168.1.100])
by localhost.bayonne.dyndns.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h6LNZ8UC002078;
Mon, 21 Jul 2003 19:35:08 -0400
Message-ID: <3F1C6A99.1000708-at-ostel.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 18:35:05 -0400
From: David Sugar
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Inker, Evan"
CC: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Subject: Re: [hangout] SCO Escalates Linux Battle
References:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: David Sugar
List: New Yorker GNU Linux Scene
Admin: To unsubscribe send unsubscribe name-at-domian.com in the body to hangout-request-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 12522
Status: RO
Content-Length: 10913
Lines: 210
I wonder, and my inner lawyer wonders this; if by claiming end users
infringe and claiming liability to end users, have they just also
empowered millions of users around the world with legal standing to
individually sue SCO, each in their own individual jurisdications?
Inker, Evan wrote:
>Ok, who's going to be the first to send SCO a check for the licensing fees
>for their linux box?
>Ruben, how about you being the first.....
>
>
>July 21, 2003
>SCO Escalates Linux Battle
>By Thor Olavsrud
>http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/2237771
>
>
>Laying the ground work to take its battle with Linux directly to Linux
>customers, SCO Group (Quote
> , Company Info
> ) said it
>has received U.S. copyright registrations for its Unix System V and UnixWare
>source code, just the firepower it needs to pursue copyright violation
>suits.
>"SCO now has broad legal rights against end-users," Darl McBride, president
>and CEO of SCO, said Monday. "We intend to use these rights carefully and
>judiciously."
>
>Until now, SCO's conflict with Linux, which it claims is an unauthorized
>derivation of its Unix code, has centered on a breach of contract suit
> aimed at IBM
>(Quote , Company
>Info ). But
>with the copyrights in hand, SCO said using Linux is essentially software
>piracy, and it is ready to open a new revenue stream by giving Linux users
>immunity to copyright violations through licensing.
>"Today is really the formalization of our going down the path of broadening
>our case to go beyond just contracts to include copyrights," McBride said.
>He added, "Today's announcement really is a new front that we're opening
>up."
>
>The company said it plans to offer UnixWare licenses tailored to support
>run-time, binary use of Linux for all commercial users of Linux based on the
>2.4.x and later versions of the Linux kernel. SCO said any commercial Linux
>customers that purchase the license will be held harmless against past
>copyright violations and for any future use of Linux in a run-only, binary
>format.
>
>"For several months, SCO has focused primarily on IBM's alleged Unix
>contract violations and misappropriation of Unix source code," said Darl
>McBride, president and CEO of SCO Group. "Today, we're stating that the
>alleged actions of IBM and others have caused customers to use a tainted
>product at SCO's expense. With more than 2.4 million Linux servers running
>our software, and thousands more running Linux every day, we expect SCO to
>be compensated for the benefits realized by tens of thousands of customers.
>Though we possess broad legal rights, we plan to use these carefully and
>judiciously."
>The company is still establishing pricing on the new licenses, which McBride
>said will be available with volume licensing discounts.
>
>"Since the year 2001, commercial Linux customers have been purchasing and
>receiving software that includes misappropriated Unix software owned by
>SCO," said Chris Sontag, senior vice president and general manager of
>SCOsource, the company's intellectual property unit. "While using pirated
>software is copyright infringement, our first choice in helping Linux
>customers is to give them an option that will not disrupt their IT
>infrastructures. We intend to provide them with choices to help them run
>Linux in a legal and fully-paid for way."
>
>The company said Linux's Symmetrical Multi-Processing (SMP) capabilities,
>which are essential to making Linux an enterprise-grade operating system,
>are derived from Unix System V and its derivative works (like IBM's AIX).
>McBride claimed SCO has found three distinct areas of infringement:
>
>* Direct line-by-line code taken from SCO's Unix System V, which he
>noted made its way into Linux from various vendors, "primarily other than
>IBM"
>* Direct line-by-line code taken from derivations of Unix System V
>code, like IBM's AIX; McBride noted that its contracts with Unix vendors
>prevent those companies from donating any code based on or derived
>from the Unix System V kernel
>* Non-literal infringement which stems from code which borrows from
>the concepts and structure of Unix.
>
>Despite speculation that some of the alleged infringing code may have come
>from BSD (at one point, System V code borrowed from 4.4BSD, removing
>attributions and copyrights), McBride said that is not the case.
>
>"We're not talking about BSD code," he said. "We're talking about high-end
>SMP code that has been donated in the past year or two and has not made the
>rounds through BSD."
>
>SCO said it will begin contacting companies regarding their use of Linux
>this week, and give them the option of buying a UnixWare license. The
>company's stock price rocketed up about 15 percent, to $13.75 a share, in
>mid-morning trading after the licensing plan was unveiled.
>
>SCO's crusade against Linux began with IBM. On March 6, the company sent a
>letter to IBM Chairman and CEO Sam Palmisano, warning him that IBM had
>allegedly breached its contract with SCO by contributing portions of its
>Unix-based AIX code to the open source movement, and by introducing concepts
>from Project Monterey, a joint effort by SCO and IBM to develop a 64-bit
>Unix-based operating system for Intel-based processing platforms, into
>Linux. IBM scrapped Project Monterey in May 2001.
>
>But in the meantime, while maintaining that its problems were with IBM and
>the alleged violation of its contract, SCO has also been giving customers
>notice. In May, it sent a letter to some 1,350 companies that use Linux,
>warning them, "similar to analogous efforts underway in the music industry,
>we are prepared to take all actions necessary to stop the ongoing violation
>of our intellectual property or other rights."
>It also issued a statement
> that "Linux is
>an unauthorized derivative of Unix and that legal liability for the use of
>Linux may extend to commercial users."
>
>While the case against IBM is still in the initial phases, SCO has already
>terminated IBM's
>license for the AIX operating system. IBM maintains the license is perpetual
>and irrevocable, and continues selling AIX.
>
>
>Unix Background
>
>Unix was developed at AT&T's Bell Labs in 1969, but its history since then
>has been convoluted at best, leading experts like Open Source Initiative
>President Eric Raymond to delineate definitions for various operating
>systems that fall into the Unix family. Raymond uses "genetic Unix" to
>describe those operating systems which are derivative works of the original
>Bell Labs Unix.
>
>Outside contributors, especially academics working from UC Berkeley and
>other institutions, supplied much of Unix's development after 1975,
>according to Raymond. Around 1980, Berkeley Unix hackers added Internet
>capability to the code base. By 1990, the relationship between AT&T's Unix
>Systems Laboratories (USL) and Berkeley had soured, leading to a three year
>lawsuit with a settlement that severed Berkeley's version of the Unix
>source, BSD, from AT&T. In 1992, the Unix trademark passed to the Open
>Group, a technical standards consortium which now maintains the Unix
>standard. Unices which adhere to and verify conformance with the standard
>are "trademark Unix" operating systems.
>
>The Bell Labs code passed from AT&T to USL when AT&T spun it off in 1992 in
>a joint venture with Novell (the Unix trademark went to Open Group -- then
>known as X/Open -- as part of the deal). Novell bought AT&T's stake in USL
>in 1993. The property then passed from Novell to SCO in 1995. Meanwhile, the
>Unix universe had seen a birth of a number of other Unices, including:
>
>* AIX, IBM's Unix, a proprietary genetic and trademark Unix developed
>between 1987 and 1990
>* Solaris, the proprietary genetic and trademark Unix used by Sun
>Microsystems
>* SCO Open Server, SCO's version of Unix, a proprietary genetic and
>trademark Unix dating back to the early 1980s
>* BSD, an open source genetic Unix, but not a trademark Unix, which
>now has three variants of its own
>* Linux, an open source variant developed in Finland in 1991 which
>Raymond said is neither a genetic Unix nor a trademark Unix.
>
>SCO added UnixWare, the brand name carried by later versions of Bell Labs'
>Unix, after it acquired it in 1995. In the meantime, to further muddy the
>picture, System V, the Unix that later evolved into UnixWare, borrowed from
>4.4BSD, leading Berkeley to sue.
>
>"It seems that from as far back as before 1985, the historical Bell Labs
>code base has been incorporating large amounts of software from the BSD
>sources," Raymond said in OSI's position paper
> on the SCO-vs.-IBM complaint.
>"The University's cause of action lay in the fact that AT&T, USL and Novell
>had routinely violated the terms of the BSD license by removing license
>attributions and copyrights."
>
>The lawsuit was settled and the record sealed.
>
>
>
>****************************************************************************
>This message contains confidential information and is intended only
>for the individual or entity named. If you are not the named addressee
>you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
>Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received
>this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
>E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
>as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive
>late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not
>accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this
>message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
>If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
>This message is provided for informational purposes and should not
>be construed as an invitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
>related financial instruments.
>GAM operates in many jurisdictions and is
>regulated or licensed in those jurisdictions as required.
>****************************************************************************
>
>____________________________
>NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
>Fair Use -
>because it's either fair use or useless....
>NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
>
>
____________________________
NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
Fair Use -
because it's either fair use or useless....
NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
|
|
