MESSAGE
| DATE | 2004-05-20 |
| FROM | Ruben Safir
|
| SUBJECT | RE: [hangout] windows server 2003 vs Linux
|
From owner-hangout-desteny-at-mrbrklyn.com Thu May 20 07:35:55 2004
X-UIDL: &?P"!i^'#!/c1"!+d/"!
Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1])
by mrbrklyn.com (8.12.11/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id i4KBZtTA013315
for ; Thu, 20 May 2004 07:35:55 -0400
Received: (from mdom-at-localhost)
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.12.11/8.12.3/Submit) id i4KBZtnu013314
for hangout-desteny; Thu, 20 May 2004 07:35:55 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: www2.mrbrklyn.com: mdom set sender to owner-hangout-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com using -f
Received: from flatbush.mrbrklyn.com (flatbush.mrbrklyn.com [10.0.0.62])
by mrbrklyn.com (8.12.11/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id i4KBZW3t013304;
Thu, 20 May 2004 07:35:32 -0400
Subject: RE: [hangout] windows server 2003 vs Linux
From: Ruben Safir
To: "Inker, Evan"
Cc: "'Spidey309-at-aol.com'" , hangout-at-nylxs.com
In-Reply-To: <386AEEE1B7BAC34CB4DDF394C23492785F4F3B-at-w2cs-nyk02.gam.com>
References: <386AEEE1B7BAC34CB4DDF394C23492785F4F3B-at-w2cs-nyk02.gam.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: NYLXS
Message-Id: <1085055155.4248.1.camel-at-flatbush.mrbrklyn.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 08:12:35 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Ruben Safir
List: New Yorker GNU Linux Scene
Admin: To unsubscribe send unsubscribe name-at-domian.com in the body to hangout-request-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on www2.mrbrklyn.com
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.63
X-Spam-Level:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 34449
Status: RO
Content-Length: 2989
Lines: 76
Not that it matters to me, but as long as it has ActiveX and Internet
Explorer, it can not be made secure. Aside from that, I agree with
Adam. It fails to be a useable system regardless of the improvements it
might, or might not, have due to its restrictive licensing.
Ruben
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 12:53, Inker, Evan wrote:
> Without a doubt, Windows 2003 Server is the best yet they have offered in
> terms of keeping it simple by not loading up every insecure service they
> could start up. But unfortunately, once you add their other software
> products to the mix it's a MS Windows update nightmare in terms of security
> and OS patches. And again, do you want Big Brother reaching into your server
> to monitor your actions......
>
> Regards,
>
> Evan M. Inker (New York) x. 4615
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Spidey309-at-aol.com [mailto:Spidey309-at-aol.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 10:16 AM
> To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
> Subject: [hangout] windows server 2003 vs Linux
>
>
>
> Hey ruben,
>
> I was just browsing through the specs for windows server 2003 and was
> wondering if perhaps the may have finally come out with a descent product.
> Am I wrong or has windows finally come out with a quality product?
>
> -The instigator
> ____________________________
> NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
> Fair Use -
> because it's either fair use or useless....
> NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
>
>
> ****************************************************************************
> This message contains confidential information and is intended only
> for the individual or entity named. If you are not the named addressee
> you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
> Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received
> this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
> E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive
> late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not
> accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this
> message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
> If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
> This message is provided for informational purposes and should not
> be construed as an invitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
> related financial instruments.
> GAM operates in many jurisdictions and is
> regulated or licensed in those jurisdictions as required.
> ****************************************************************************
>
> ____________________________
> NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
> Fair Use -
> because it's either fair use or useless....
> NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
>
____________________________
NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
Fair Use -
because it's either fair use or useless....
NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
|
|
