MESSAGE
| DATE | 2005-10-01 |
| FROM | Contrarian
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] New York Housing --- umm, OT?
|
From owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Sat Oct 1 22:27:59 2005 Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id j922RvRn023643 for ; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 22:27:59 -0400 Received: (from majordomo-at-localhost) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j922RvXj023642 for hangout-outgoings; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 22:27:57 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: www2.mrbrklyn.com: majordomo set sender to owner-hangout-at-nylxs.com using -f Received: from bsd4.nyct.net (mail-out.nyct.net [216.139.141.2]) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id j922Rsst023639 for ; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 22:27:56 -0400 Received: from bsd1.nyct.net (bsd1.nyct.net [216.139.147.7] (may be forged)) by bsd4.nyct.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j922TQQt000558 for ; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 22:29:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from adrba-at-nyct.net) Received: from localhost (adrba-at-localhost) by bsd1.nyct.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id j922TQ32001736 for ; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 22:29:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from adrba-at-nyct.net) X-Authentication-Warning: bsd1.nyct.net: adrba owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 22:29:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Contrarian To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] New York Housing --- umm, OT? In-Reply-To: <1128215769.25417.15.camel-at-stat29.mrbrklyn.com> Message-ID: <20051001220231.F263-at-bsd1.nyct.net> References: <200510010841.40546.sderrick-at-optonline.net> <1128215769.25417.15.camel-at-stat29.mrbrklyn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 495 Lines: 12 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 12590
If anything is OT for Hangout. As a historical observation, I note that free market - interventionism or libertarianims - interventionism schemata don't necessarily fit well with the history of UNIX; I'm not sure of the overall connexion with free software.
As a general conclusion, Free Software stands or falls on the existence of active proponents. But government mandates requiring Free Software as opposed to proprietary are not out of line with the F.S. philosophy.
|
|