MESSAGE
| DATE | 2006-05-23 |
| FROM | Ruben Safir
|
| SUBJECT | Subject: [rick@linuxmafia.com: Re: [Balug-talk] [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Its a sorry day for The Linux?Journal]
|
From owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Tue May 23 10:32:31 2006
Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id k4NEWT3Y023371
for ; Tue, 23 May 2006 10:32:31 -0400
Received: (from majordomo-at-localhost)
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k4NEWTd2023370
for hangout-outgoings; Tue, 23 May 2006 10:32:29 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: www2.mrbrklyn.com: majordomo set sender to owner-hangout-at-nylxs.com using -f
Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id k4NEWQ1i023367;
Tue, 23 May 2006 10:32:28 -0400
Received: (from ruben-at-localhost)
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k4NEWQq4023366;
Tue, 23 May 2006 10:32:26 -0400
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 10:32:26 -0400
From: Ruben Safir
To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com, rms-at-gnu.org
Subject: [rick-at-linuxmafia.com: Re: [Balug-talk] [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Its a sorry day for The Linux?Journal]
Message-ID: <20060523143226.GF23149-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 9619
Status: RO
Content-Length: 2354
Lines: 61
Quoting Matt Thrailkill (matt-at-modestolan.com):
> How do I make the distinction between an adherent and an "open source
> person"? Maybe the latter is poor word choice anyways. Am I correct to
> interpret you as saying Linus is an adherent, because he is not
> technically a member of the OSI?
I did _not_ say that.
I really should not have to waste my time advising you about what I did
_not_ say -- especially since I've already addressed this point.
What I said -- to repeat myself, which I do not intend to do again --
was that it was damned peculiar that you chose a person who has no
discernible connection with OSI as exemplifying the views of "open
source persons", when a couple of dozen well-known persons of
longstanding were available who _are_ associated formally with OSI.
Add that to the fact that the cited quotation didn't even support your
assertion anyway, and one is lead to suspect that you were straining
wildly because you had no real ability to support your point at all.
That is exactly what I said earlier today. It is very vexing to have to
say it twice, for no better reason than your being either willfully dense
or straining to find something to argue with, or both.
If you honestly are having such extreme difficulty correctly
understanding my posts that you're driven to positing blatantly silly
interpretations of them, I suggest you quit.
> This is getting back to the footsie you mentioned originally, isn't it?
You went there. That really wasn't very smart. Pray do not try it
again.
_______________________________________________
balug-talk mailing list
balug-talk-at-lists.balug.org
http://lists.balug.org/listinfo.cgi/balug-talk-balug.org
--
__________________________
Brooklyn Linux Solutions
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998
DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS - RI Safir 2002
http://fairuse.nylxs.com
"Yeah - I write Free Software...so SUE ME"
http://www.mrbrklyn.com - Consulting
http://www.inns.net <-- Happy Clients
http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software
http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/resources - Unpublished Archive or stories and articles from around the net
http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/downtown.html - See the New Downtown Brooklyn....
|
|
