|FROM ||Paul Charles Leddy
|SUBJECT ||Re: [firstname.lastname@example.org: Re: [email@example.com: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT]
|From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Sun Jan 3 20:10:24 2010
Received: by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix)
id A221456EF4; Sun, 3 Jan 2010 20:10:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28)
id 8F03556F01; Sun, 3 Jan 2010 20:10:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail-px0-f172.google.com (mail-px0-f172.google.com [126.96.36.199])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B95356EF4
for ; Sun, 3 Jan 2010 20:10:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: by pxi2 with SMTP id 2so10271665pxi.11
for ; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:08:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
Received: by 10.114.252.14 with SMTP id z14mr151254wah.84.1262567287918; Sun,
03 Jan 2010 17:08:07 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 20:08:07 -0500
Subject: Re: [rms-at-gnu.org: Re: [mrbrklyn-at-panix.com: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT]
From: Paul Charles Leddy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Ya, this idea that Monty is in M$ pocket is mind blowing. Seemed like
maybe just a Groklaw guess.
Maybe I'll ask him why, to clarify.
If he made all that money, why would he go for more? Bizarre.
Hopefully, he just said yes to be on board overlooking some dev tools
to be in the loop.
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> It appears Monty is now in Microsoft's pocket and promoting
> Microsoft-style misinformation. =A0However, on one point
> he might be right:
> =A0 =A0Lastly, I'm not in agreement of his interpretation of the GPL, alt=
> =A0 =A0I'm double checking with Richard. =A0Who says you can't build prop=
> =A0 =A0apps on top of Free Software without extra legal clauses?
> If you receive someone else's GPL-covered code and include it in a
> larger program, the entire larger program has to be free software.
> I don't know what Monty actually said, so I don't know if what he said
> is right or wrong, but I've told you the facts about this point.