|FROM ||Ruben Safir
|SUBJECT ||Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Next NYLXS Meeting
|From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Sat Feb 25 22:59:56 2012
Received: by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix)
id D761E100BB5; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:59:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28)
id C6550100BEC; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:59:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [22.214.171.124])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB99100BB5
for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:59:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from panix2.panix.com (panix2.panix.com [126.96.36.199])
by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3248732A5F
for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:58:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: by panix2.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 20529)
id 214BA33C52; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:58:12 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:58:12 -0500
From: Ruben Safir
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Next NYLXS Meeting
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:31:14PM -0500, einker wrote:
> Amen Brother ........
Initially I wanted to get to the NYLUG charter meeting on that day, but
I'm honestly having second thoughts on the whole thing at this point.
After the initial ruckus, it seems that all the diverse voices that
would have made the process contentous have now fallen aside. The last
meeting had essentially just the portion of the leadership of NYLUG
which was originally in opposition of Ron et al, plus Rob Memnes and
David.... and a lawyer.
So, if the only individuals who want to do the work are of that like
minded group, and a lawyer, then they really don't need me or us any
more. They can do this in a room with their lawyer, and what do I care?
Meanwhile NYLXS has its own problems I need to review and get some stuff
done with. And I have a huge stack of personal problems it resolve.
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
> > I can be available for that date as well, but please let me know the
> > location and time at least 2 days in advance so I can set an appropriate
> > alarm in my calendar.
> > On I side note if you don't get the location down 5 days in advance if I
> > have a good guess on the expected number of people and time 5 days in
> > advance I can give suggestions about the exact place with wifi, note the
> > quality of the location goes down with higher quantity.
> > On Feb 22, 2012 10:32 AM, "einker" wrote:
> >> Tues March 06, 2012 what time works for you?
> >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >>> I need to call a meeting for 2 weeks from Tuesday (yesterday) in the
> >>> Village.
> >>> Ruben
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >> Evan M. Inker
> Evan M. Inker