|FROM ||Michael L Richardson
|SUBJECT ||Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Next NYLXS Meeting
|From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Mon Feb 27 06:39:50 2012
Received: by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix)
id B5FB3100C01; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:39:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28)
id 9EF52100C0A; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:39:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [184.108.40.206])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D85D100C01
for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:39:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.0.192] (50-14-90-252.nyc.clearwire-wmx.net [220.127.116.11])
by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus2) with ESMTP (Nemesis)
id 0M7oxE-1SO4Bc2pXM-00vi4a; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:37:54 -0500
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:37:50 -0500
From: Michael L Richardson
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Next NYLXS Meeting
References: <20120222152500.GA4523-at-panix.com> <20120226035811.GA16050-at-panix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
What is the calender date and time?
A Notary Public for the State of New York.
On 2/25/2012 10:58 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:31:14PM -0500, einker wrote:
>> Amen Brother ........
> Initially I wanted to get to the NYLUG charter meeting on that day, but
> I'm honestly having second thoughts on the whole thing at this point.
> After the initial ruckus, it seems that all the diverse voices that
> would have made the process contentous have now fallen aside. The last
> meeting had essentially just the portion of the leadership of NYLUG
> which was originally in opposition of Ron et al, plus Rob Memnes and
> David.... and a lawyer.
> So, if the only individuals who want to do the work are of that like
> minded group, and a lawyer, then they really don't need me or us any
> more. They can do this in a room with their lawyer, and what do I care?
> Meanwhile NYLXS has its own problems I need to review and get some stuff
> done with. And I have a huge stack of personal problems it resolve.
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Paul Robert Marinowrote:
>>> I can be available for that date as well, but please let me know the
>>> location and time at least 2 days in advance so I can set an appropriate
>>> alarm in my calendar.
>>> On I side note if you don't get the location down 5 days in advance if I
>>> have a good guess on the expected number of people and time 5 days in
>>> advance I can give suggestions about the exact place with wifi, note the
>>> quality of the location goes down with higher quantity.
>>> On Feb 22, 2012 10:32 AM, "einker" wrote:
>>>> Tues March 06, 2012 what time works for you?
>>>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Ruben Safir wrote:
>>>>> I need to call a meeting for 2 weeks from Tuesday (yesterday) in the
>>>> Evan M. Inker
>> Evan M. Inker