|FROM ||Ruben Safir
|SUBJECT ||Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] The best top down mandate I've ever heard any
|From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Thu Apr 19 15:33:56 2012
Received: by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix)
id 32103529E9; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:33:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28)
id 1CBB55445E; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:33:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [184.108.40.206])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEE6529E9
for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:33:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.17] (www2.mrbrklyn.com [220.127.116.11])
by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4DD28441;
Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:33:45 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:33:45 -0400
From: Ruben Safir
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:18.104.22.168) Gecko/20120306 SUSE/3.1.20 Thunderbird/3.1.20
CC: Paul Robert Marino
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] The best top down mandate I've ever heard any
place I work
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 04/19/2012 02:02 PM, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
> Get this The management at the broadcasting company I'm working for
> put out a new mandate last week for all the system staff involved in
> the broadcasting portion of the company.
> When working with open source or free software employees are required
> to do the following prior to implementation in production.
> 1) Report any bugs and workarounds they discover to the original
> creators of the software and or intermediate support vendor when
> 2) Submit all patches developed internally to the original creators
> of the software and or intermediate support vendor when applicable.
> In other words participation in the project is mandatory as part of
> our pier review process for any free or open source software we use.
> There is a lot more to the statement but the short version basically
> means that as long as we don't reveal sensitive information that
> applies directly to how we specifically as a company earn revenue or
> exposes the company to possible legal liability (e.g. like writing a
> patch that implements patented tech we don't own) we are required to
> give back to the community.
> It seams like they actually get how free software actually works, and
> that's encouraging that large companies that don't produce software
> themselves are starting to finally understand it.
Yeah - the Media companies have been byting the hand that feeds it since
the Titanic or even before.