MESSAGE
| DATE | 2013-03-20 |
| FROM | Ruben Safir
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] yabb
|
From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Wed Mar 20 20:31:20 2013
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix)
id E9AAC161C95; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:31:19 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28)
id D7366161C98; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:31:19 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5C8161C95
for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:31:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from panix2.panix.com (panix2.panix.com [166.84.1.2])
by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A0134421
for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:31:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by panix2.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 20529)
id 8646033C8E; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:31:18 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:31:18 -0400
From: Ruben Safir
To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] yabb
Message-ID: <20130321003118.GB22677-at-panix.com>
References: <20130320093941.GA28196-at-panix.com>
<20130320110205.GA12885-at-panix.com>
<20130320133830.GA13674-at-tycho.gnutelephony.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130320133830.GA13674-at-tycho.gnutelephony.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:38:30AM -0400, David Sugar wrote:
> Isn't this what the existing apache uri rewrite rules/module is also normally
> used for, to do translations between uri paths and cgi arguments? I recall
> mediawiki can use rewrite rules to normalize document paths to feed the core
> app. Why do they have/want to do it differently than anyone else has?
> Doing it as a kind of redirect just seems bizaare to me.
Yeah - well if they stuck with Apache and GNU/Unix then they could have
just written this into a modperl core part of the application. Instead,
it runs out of a CGI, which can not be the best thing going.
> But I have heard
> equally bizzare things recently, like people insisting that file managers
> should now only present case insensitive file ordering, when of course the
> native file system is and always have been case sensitive...
>
Even in DOS?
BTW - I had this problem year and years back with users using capital
letters in their names and fouling up email.
YOUR FILES ARE IMPORTANT. LOOK LOOK LOOK
I can safely say, after almost 20 years at this, that desktop
programmers are the stupidest, easiest to brainwash, most didtsy, PIA
programmers and users of any technophiles. They are just dumb as rocks,
never learn from their, or others, experiences, and can be fed any line
of technobable garbage which they will take hook line and sinker.
And never try to argue with them. It is like arguing with your 13 year
old daughter.
Ruben
|
|
