MESSAGE
| DATE | 2013-10-10 |
| FROM | adrba@nyct.net
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] test message
|
From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Thu Oct 10 02:29:23 2013
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix)
id B1630161137; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 02:29:22 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28)
id 9F74016113D; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 02:29:22 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: from mail.nyct.net (mail-out9.nyct.net [216.139.141.9])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2369A161137
for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 02:29:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from webmail2.nyct.net (bsd20.nyct.net [216.139.147.96])
by mail.nyct.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r9A6SP0l066686
for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 02:28:25 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from adrba-at-nyct.net)
Received: from 170.170.59.139 (proxying for 10.50.44.40)
(SquirrelMail authenticated user adrba)
by webmail2.nyct.net with HTTP;
Thu, 10 Oct 2013 02:28:25 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <25081.170.170.59.139.1381386505.squirrel-at-webmail2.nyct.net>
In-Reply-To: <20131010015357.GA27423-at-panix.com>
References: <20131008054549.GA12579-at-panix.com>
<1381232101.2138.YahooMailNeo-at-web120004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
<20131008152713.GA24469-at-panix.com>
<1381284655.93668.YahooMailNeo-at-web120006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
<15659.209.2.61.8.1381349344.squirrel-at-webmail2.nyct.net>
<20131010015357.GA27423-at-panix.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 02:28:25 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] test message
From: adrba-at-nyct.net
To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 04:09:04PM -0400, adrba-at-nyct.net wrote:
>> to see if this gets through. mine of last night did not.
>>
>
>
> why would it not?
>
because I hadn't gotten any replies for a while.
|
|
