Wed Jun 3 15:18:14 2020
EVENTS
 FREE
SOFTWARE
INSTITUTE

POLITICS
JOBS
MEMBERS'
CORNER

MAILING
LIST

NYLXS Mailing Lists and Archives
NYLXS Members have a lot to say and share but we don't keep many secrets. Join the Hangout Mailing List and say your peice.

DATE 2017-02-01

HANGOUT

2020-06-03 | 2020-05-03 | 2020-04-03 | 2020-03-03 | 2020-02-03 | 2020-01-03 | 2019-12-03 | 2019-11-03 | 2019-10-03 | 2019-09-03 | 2019-08-03 | 2019-07-03 | 2019-06-03 | 2019-05-03 | 2019-04-03 | 2019-03-03 | 2019-02-03 | 2019-01-03 | 2018-12-03 | 2018-11-03 | 2018-10-03 | 2018-09-03 | 2018-08-03 | 2018-07-03 | 2018-06-03 | 2018-05-03 | 2018-04-03 | 2018-03-03 | 2018-02-03 | 2018-01-03 | 2017-12-03 | 2017-11-03 | 2017-10-03 | 2017-09-03 | 2017-08-03 | 2017-07-03 | 2017-06-03 | 2017-05-03 | 2017-04-03 | 2017-03-03 | 2017-02-03 | 2017-01-03 | 2016-12-03 | 2016-11-03 | 2016-10-03 | 2016-09-03 | 2016-08-03 | 2016-07-03 | 2016-06-03 | 2016-05-03 | 2016-04-03 | 2016-03-03 | 2016-02-03 | 2016-01-03 | 2015-12-03 | 2015-11-03 | 2015-10-03 | 2015-09-03 | 2015-08-03 | 2015-07-03 | 2015-06-03 | 2015-05-03 | 2015-04-03 | 2015-03-03 | 2015-02-03 | 2015-01-03 | 2014-12-03 | 2014-11-03 | 2014-10-03 | 2014-09-03 | 2014-08-03 | 2014-07-03 | 2014-06-03 | 2014-05-03 | 2014-04-03 | 2014-03-03 | 2014-02-03 | 2014-01-03 | 2013-12-03 | 2013-11-03 | 2013-10-03 | 2013-09-03 | 2013-08-03 | 2013-07-03 | 2013-06-03 | 2013-05-03 | 2013-04-03 | 2013-03-03 | 2013-02-03 | 2013-01-03 | 2012-12-03 | 2012-11-03 | 2012-10-03 | 2012-09-03 | 2012-08-03 | 2012-07-03 | 2012-06-03 | 2012-05-03 | 2012-04-03 | 2012-03-03 | 2012-02-03 | 2012-01-03 | 2011-12-03 | 2011-11-03 | 2011-10-03 | 2011-09-03 | 2011-08-03 | 2011-07-03 | 2011-06-03 | 2011-05-03 | 2011-04-03 | 2011-03-03 | 2011-02-03 | 2011-01-03 | 2010-12-03 | 2010-11-03 | 2010-10-03 | 2010-09-03 | 2010-08-03 | 2010-07-03 | 2010-06-03 | 2010-05-03 | 2010-04-03 | 2010-03-03 | 2010-02-03 | 2010-01-03 | 2009-12-03 | 2009-11-03 | 2009-10-03 | 2009-09-03 | 2009-08-03 | 2009-07-03 | 2009-06-03 | 2009-05-03 | 2009-04-03 | 2009-03-03 | 2009-02-03 | 2009-01-03 | 2008-12-03 | 2008-11-03 | 2008-10-03 | 2008-09-03 | 2008-08-03 | 2008-07-03 | 2008-06-03 | 2008-05-03 | 2008-04-03 | 2008-03-03 | 2008-02-03 | 2008-01-03 | 2007-12-03 | 2007-11-03 | 2007-10-03 | 2007-09-03 | 2007-08-03 | 2007-07-03 | 2007-06-03 | 2007-05-03 | 2007-04-03 | 2007-03-03 | 2007-02-03 | 2007-01-03 | 2006-12-03 | 2006-11-03 | 2006-10-03 | 2006-09-03 | 2006-08-03 | 2006-07-03 | 2006-06-03 | 2006-05-03 | 2006-04-03 | 2006-03-03 | 2006-02-03 | 2006-01-03 | 2005-12-03 | 2005-11-03 | 2005-10-03 | 2005-09-03 | 2005-08-03 | 2005-07-03 | 2005-06-03 | 2005-05-03 | 2005-04-03 | 2005-03-03 | 2005-02-03 | 2005-01-03 | 2004-12-03 | 2004-11-03 | 2004-10-03 | 2004-09-03 | 2004-08-03 | 2004-07-03 | 2004-06-03 | 2004-05-03 | 2004-04-03 | 2004-03-03 | 2004-02-03 | 2004-01-03 | 2003-12-03 | 2003-11-03 | 2003-10-03 | 2003-09-03 | 2003-08-03 | 2003-07-03 | 2003-06-03 | 2003-05-03 | 2003-04-03 | 2003-03-03 | 2003-02-03 | 2003-01-03 | 2002-12-03 | 2002-11-03 | 2002-10-03 | 2002-09-03 | 2002-08-03 | 2002-07-03 | 2002-06-03 | 2002-05-03 | 2002-04-03 | 2002-03-03 | 2002-02-03 | 2002-01-03 | 2001-12-03 | 2001-11-03 | 2001-10-03 | 2001-09-03 | 2001-08-03 | 2001-07-03 | 2001-06-03 | 2001-05-03 | 2001-04-03 | 2001-03-03 | 2001-02-03 | 2001-01-03 | 2000-12-03 | 2000-11-03 | 2000-10-03 | 2000-09-03 | 2000-08-03 | 2000-07-03 | 2000-06-03 | 2000-05-03 | 2000-04-03 | 2000-03-03 | 2000-02-03 | 2000-01-03 | 1999-12-03

Key: id Value: 546067

Key: archive Value: 2017-02-01

MESSAGE
DATE 2017-02-28
FROM Ruben Safir
SUBJECT Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Peer Review
From hangout-bounces-at-nylxs.com Tue Feb 28 09:42:10 2017
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: from www.mrbrklyn.com (www.mrbrklyn.com [96.57.23.82])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27F0161312;
Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:42:07 -0500 (EST)
X-Original-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Delivered-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Received: from [10.0.0.62] (flatbush.mrbrklyn.com [10.0.0.62])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A6116001A;
Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:42:02 -0500 (EST)
To: Hangout
From: Ruben Safir
Message-ID: <4ee77e1b-2b7f-993b-0451-0ef1fe397651-at-mrbrklyn.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:42:02 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Peer Review
X-BeenThere: hangout-at-nylxs.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: NYLXS Discussions List
List-Id: NYLXS Discussions List
List-Unsubscribe: ,

List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: hangout-bounces-at-nylxs.com
Sender: "hangout"

http://blog.scienceopen.com/2017/02/a-post-publication-peer-review-success-=
story/


A post-publication peer review success story
February 28, 2017 *
Author: Jon Tennant



In 2016, Dr. Joel Pitt and Prof. Helene Hill published an important
paper in ScienceOpen Research. In their paper, they propose new
statistical methods to detect scientific fraudulent data. Pitt and Hill
demonstrate the use of their method on a single case of suspected fraud.
Crucially, in their excellent effort to combat fraud, Pitt and Hill make
the raw data on which they tested their method publicly available on the
Open Science Framework (OSF). Considering that a single case of
scientific fraud can cost institutions and private citizens a huge
amount of money, their result is provocative, and it emphasizes how
important it is to make the raw data of research papers publicly available.

The Pitt and Hill (2016) article was read and downloaded almost 100
times a day since its publication on ScienceOpen. More importantly, it
now has 7 independent post-publication peer reviews and 5 comments.
Although this is a single paper in ScienceOpen=E2=80=99s vast index of 28
million research articles (all open to post-publication peer review!),
the story of how this article got so much attention is worth re-telling.
Enhanced article-level statistics and context =E2=80=93 just one of 28 mill=
ion
on our platform!

Peer review history

The manuscript was submitted and published in January 2016, and the
final typeset version of the article was available for download on March
1st. Shortly after this in May 2016, PhD student Chris Hartgerink
publicly peer reviewed the article, summarising it as =E2=80=9CInteresting
research, but in need of substantial rewriting.=E2=80=9D

It was after this that the article came to the attention of Prof. Philip
B. Stark, an Associate Dean at the University of California, Berkeley,
and author of the most highly read article on our platform with over
39,000 views to date!

Prof. Stark runs a course on the theory and application of statistical
models. In his course, groups of students replicate and critique the
statistical analyses of published research articles using the article=E2=80=
=99s
publicly available raw data. Obviously, for this course to work, Prof.
Stark needs rigorous research articles and the raw data used in the
article. In this sense, Pitt and Hill=E2=80=99s article on ScienceOpen was =
an
ideal candidate..

The groups of students started their critical replication of the Hill
and Pitt article in the Fall semester of 2016 and finished right before
the new year. By getting students to actively engage with research,
they gain the confidence and expertise to critically analyse published
research.

The Post-Publication Peer Review function on ScienceOpen is usually only
open to researchers with more than 5 published articles. This would have
normally barred Stark=E2=80=99s groups from publishing their critical
replications. However, upon hearing about his amazing initiative,
ScienceOpen opened their review function to each of Prof. Stark=E2=80=99s v=
etted
early career researchers. And importantly, since each peer review on
ScienceOpen is assigned a CrossRef DOI along with a CC-BY license, after
posting their reviews, each member of the group has officially shared
their very own scientific publication.

This also means that each peer review can be easily imported into any
user=E2=80=99s ORCID, Publons, and even ImpactStory profiles =E2=80=93 the =
choice is yours!

Public, post-publication peer review works

All of the complete peer reviews from the groups of students can be
found below. They all come with highly detailed statistical analyses of
the research, and are thorough, constructive, and critical, as we expect
an open peer review process to be.

Furthermore, unlike almost every other Post Publication Peer Review
function out there, the peer reviews on ScienceOpen are integrated with
graphics and plots. This awesome feature was added specifically for
Prof. Stark=E2=80=99s course, but note that it is now available for any peer
review on ScienceOpen.

Maurer and Mohanty, who stated that the work was an important
demonstration of the use of statistical methods for detecting fraud;
Hejazi, Schiffman and Zhou, who evaluated the work as comprehensible
but largely incomplete;
Dwivedi, Hejazi, Schiffman and Zhou, who note that the research is a
strong advocate for detecting scientific fraud and the use of
reproducible statistical methods;
Stern, Gong and Zhou call the research clever in the application of
the techniques t uses to address a pressing problem in science;
Bertelli, DeGraaf and Hicks think the analysis is convincing and
valuable, but with a methodology that could be refined;
Hung, Sheehan, Chen and Liu evaluated the paper, finding a few minor
discrepancies between their own results on those of the published research.

A fine example from one of the students

So overall a large variety of findings drawn from the critical
replication project, and each of which individually greatly enhance the
published research.

Aftermath

Many of the peer reviews focused on a specific assumption that the Pitt
and Hill article made about how sets of numbers are distributed. We
talked to Dr. Helene Hill for comment. She noted that Dr. Pitt was
working on the distribution issue noted by many reviewers, and that she
was happy to see her research received such critical attention.

She notes that critical reception was:

just what I was hoping for =E2=80=94 for our paper to be a model for po=
sting
and analyzing data.

Prof. Stark said there are several things that this project accomplished
for him in terms of getting students actively involved in peer review:

Get students thinking about alternative models for scholarly
publication;
Get students thinking about reproducibility and open science;
Get students to work collaboratively on a data analysis project that
involves thinking hard about the underlying science;
Get students to register with ORCID;
Get students to post their analyses on GitHub so that their own work
is reproducible/extensible;
Get students their first scientific publication.

For another step of Open Science brilliance, the reviews themselves
sought to be completely reproducible, with the code for all the
students=E2=80=99 calculations is available on GitHub (eg here and here)!

Prof Stark said:

I think it=E2=80=99s remarkable that ScienceOpen extended the platform =
and
your process to make this possible, including allowing people with fewer
than 5 publications associated with their ORCID to submit reviews,
figuring out how to allow figures in reviews, and that you are working
on allowing reviews with multiple authors. ScienceOpen was really a
partner in making this exercise possible.

We also asked some of the students how they found the peer review
exercise, many of whom praised Pitt and Hill=E2=80=99s efforts on making the
research as reproducible as possible.

Stephanie DeGraaf: =E2=80=9CThe Hill and Pitt paper made the data publicly
available and explained their analyses thoroughly enough so that we
could reproduce all of their results. The paper focused on a really
fascinating topic of testing for fraudulent data, and I really enjoyed
thinking about how to tackle the problem in a statistically valid way. I
found it really interesting to see that even though all of us in the
class were reviewing this same paper, we all had different perspectives,
criticisms, and ideas for other ways to investigate the researchers=E2=80=
=99
claims.=E2=80=9D

Aaron Stern: =E2=80=9CThe Hill and Pitt paper was a great choice for the pu=
rpose
of the course; not only did the authors employ interesting and novel
statistical methods for us to critique, but they also were tackling a
very important issue in science =E2=80=94 namely, fraud. While we agreed wi=
th
the paper=E2=80=99s conclusions, we found a number of scenarios where their
approach applied to new datasets could result in false positives; i.e.,
their methods could impugn an innocent researcher. Thus, it=E2=80=99s impor=
tant
to validate these methods thoroughly in order to avoid hurting innocent
scientists.=E2=80=9D

Kenneth Hung: =E2=80=9CIt is not very agreed, among statisticians, what
constitutes replications and reproductions. In writing this review, it
gave my new and broader perspectives, in comparison to the
post-selection inference background I came from, as well as common tools
in practice for detecting scientific frauds.=E2=80=9D

Nima Hejazi: =E2=80=9CConstructing a review of the paper required extensive
collaboration, the use of open source software tools, and the leveraging
of statistical and domain knowledge for the purpose of detecting
fraudulent science =E2=80=93 all in all an experience that demonstrated qui=
te
well the challenges of working with real-world data and making use of
open-access publishing platforms.=E2=80=9D
Prof. Stark=E2=80=99s profile on our platform. Those stats are looking grea=
t!

Great success!

So we definitely count this as a major success story on several levels.

Students gained the experience in performing analyses for the sake
of reproducible research.
Students also gained the skills and confidence to perform rigorous
and constructive peer reviews in public.
Post-publication peer review works just as well, if not better, than
traditional peer review.
Openness facilitates recognition and reward for peer review, which
is crucial for those just starting their research careers.
This whole exercise shows that just because research has been
published, it does not mean that critical evaluation of it should stop.

So, what is the next step? Well, anyone who has an ORCID can peer review
any of 28 million research articles on our platform. They don=E2=80=99t hav=
e to
be detailed statistical analyses =E2=80=93 they can be critical commentarie=
s,
additional notes and context, or what your own related research says.

The point is the choice is yours. The reason is that you help to improve
the context and progress of your research field in the open, while
improving your research skills and receiving recognition and credit for
doing so.
Share this:
-- =

So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998
http://www.mrbrklyn.com

DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS - RI Safir 2002
http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software
http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/resources - Unpublished Archive
http://www.coinhangout.com - coins!
http://www.brooklyn-living.com

Being so tracked is for FARM ANIMALS and and extermination camps,
but incompatible with living as a free human being. -RI Safir 2013
_______________________________________________
hangout mailing list
hangout-at-nylxs.com
http://www.nylxs.com/

  1. 2017-02-01 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] =?utf-8?q?The_lessons_of_Roosevelt=E2=80=99s_fail?=
  2. 2017-02-01 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] (forw) Re: [skeptic] Let the beheadings
  3. 2017-02-01 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] In other news, making America safe again
  4. 2017-02-01 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] The lessons of Roosevelt???s failures
  5. 2017-02-01 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] In other news, making America safe again
  6. 2017-02-01 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] (forw) Re: [skeptic] Let the beheadings
  7. 2017-02-01 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] (forw) Re: [skeptic] Let the beheadings
  8. 2017-02-01 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] (forw) Re: [skeptic] Let the beheadings
  9. 2017-02-01 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] (forw) Re: [skeptic] Let the beheadings
  10. 2017-02-01 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] (forw) Re: [skeptic] Let the beheadings
  11. 2017-02-01 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Let's take a vote on non free speech software
  12. 2017-02-01 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] In other news, making America safe again
  13. 2017-02-01 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] (forw) Re: [skeptic] Let the beheadings
  14. 2017-02-01 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Encryption and the law
  15. 2017-02-02 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] NP Complete
  16. 2017-02-02 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Is NYLUG still running meetings?
  17. 2017-02-02 From: "Mancini, Sabin (DFS)" <Sabin.Mancini-at-dfs.ny.gov> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Is NYLUG still running meetings? | | None since
  18. 2017-02-02 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Is NYLUG still running meetings? | | None since
  19. 2017-02-02 From: "Mancini, Sabin (DFS)" <Sabin.Mancini-at-dfs.ny.gov> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Is NYLUG still running meetings? | | Your
  20. 2017-02-02 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Is NYLUG still running meetings? | | Your
  21. 2017-02-02 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] anyone know what is this
  22. 2017-02-02 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] anyone know what is this
  23. 2017-02-02 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] looks like we just got a new lease on life
  24. 2017-02-02 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: [isoc-ny] FCC Seeks Diverse Stakeholders
  25. 2017-02-02 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] A Brooklyn Story
  26. 2017-02-02 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] anyone know what is this
  27. 2017-02-02 From: "IEEE Spectrum Tech Alert" <techalert-at-ieee.org> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Everything You Need to Know About 5G;
  28. 2017-02-02 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] anyone know what is this
  29. 2017-02-02 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] anyone know what is this
  30. 2017-02-02 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society <noreply-at-embs.org> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Your EMB Weekly Newsletter is HERE!!!!
  31. 2017-02-03 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] anyone know what is this
  32. 2017-02-03 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] irs and passports - 50K is nothing
  33. 2017-02-03 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] sad times for us all
  34. 2017-02-04 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] save the grave
  35. 2017-02-06 Gabor Szabo <gabor-at-szabgab.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] [Perlweekly] #289 - FOSDEM is over, blog posts?
  36. 2017-02-06 From: "Mancini, Sabin (DFS)" <Sabin.Mancini-at-dfs.ny.gov> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] , can you provide the addresses of those locations
  37. 2017-02-06 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] , can you provide the addresses of those
  38. 2017-02-06 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] what is important in the digital divide
  39. 2017-02-06 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] paper ramulens work for us all
  40. 2017-02-06 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] what is important in the digital divide
  41. 2017-02-07 From: "Mancini, Sabin (DFS)" <Sabin.Mancini-at-dfs.ny.gov> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] ,
  42. 2017-02-06 Ruben Safir <ruben.safir-at-my.liu.edu> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] , can you provide the addresses of those
  43. 2017-02-07 From: "Mancini, Sabin (DFS)" <Sabin.Mancini-at-dfs.ny.gov> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] , locations for group meetings;
  44. 2017-02-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Justine Bateman
  45. 2017-02-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] criminal stream of video
  46. 2017-02-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Phone Wars
  47. 2017-02-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Apple wants direct access to your GPU through the
  48. 2017-02-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Microsofts new stratergy to beat linux
  49. 2017-02-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] moving to Arizona
  50. 2017-02-08 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Hans Rosling: Data visionary and educator dies aged
  51. 2017-02-07 IEEE Computer Society <csconnection-at-computer.org> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] =?utf-8?q?Hear_from_Top_Execs_from_Raytheon=2C_Mi?=
  52. 2017-02-07 James E Keenan <jkeen-at-verizon.net> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] ny.pm tech meeting next Monday;
  53. 2017-02-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Future Communications
  54. 2017-02-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] =?utf-8?q?Fwd=3A_Hear_from_Top_Execs_from_Raytheo?=
  55. 2017-02-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] ,
  56. 2017-02-08 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Phone Wars
  57. 2017-02-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] How to become a president of a small African
  58. 2017-02-09 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] ,
  59. 2017-02-09 From: "Mancini, Sabin (DFS)" <Sabin.Mancini-at-dfs.ny.gov> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Microsofts new stratergy to beat linux | | I
  60. 2017-02-09 From: "Mancini, Sabin (DFS)" <Sabin.Mancini-at-dfs.ny.gov> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] ,
  61. 2017-02-06 Wayne Callahan <callahans2-at-msn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] [dinosaur] ISPH 2017
  62. 2017-02-09 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] ,
  63. 2017-02-09 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] ,
  64. 2017-02-09 Ruben Safir <ruben.safir-at-my.liu.edu> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Microsofts new stratergy to beat linux | | I
  65. 2017-02-09 From: "Mancini, Sabin (DFS)" <Sabin.Mancini-at-dfs.ny.gov> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Microsoft's new strategy to beat linux | |
  66. 2017-02-09 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Gtk and C++ reference
  67. 2017-02-09 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] =?utf-8?q?Fwd=3A_An_Evening_for_Educators_with_Dr?=
  68. 2017-02-09 ruben <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] History of the Talmud
  69. 2017-02-09 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] anyone know what is this
  70. 2017-02-09 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] anyone know what is this
  71. 2017-02-09 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: Innovation, opportunities & Israel's future
  72. 2017-02-10 ruben <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] anyone know what is this
  73. 2017-02-10 ruben <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] anyone know what is this
  74. 2017-02-10 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] anyone know what is this
  75. 2017-02-09 Paul Robert Marino <prmarino1-at-gmail.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Microsofts new stratergy to beat linux | | I
  76. 2017-02-10 From: "Mancini, Sabin (DFS)" <Sabin.Mancini-at-dfs.ny.gov> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Microsofts new stratergy to beat linux | | ...
  77. 2017-02-10 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: [Accu-contacts] Software engineer position
  78. 2017-02-10 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Compiler Papers
  79. 2017-02-10 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Guess this painting!!
  80. 2017-02-10 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Shabbat Shalom!
  81. 2017-02-10 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Guess this painting!!
  82. 2017-02-10 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Microsofts new stratergy to beat linux | | ...
  83. 2017-02-10 Paul Robert Marino <prmarino1-at-gmail.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Microsofts new stratergy to beat linux | | ...
  84. 2017-02-10 Ruben Safir <ruben.safir-at-my.liu.edu> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Microsofts new stratergy to beat linux | | I
  85. 2017-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Tech News - Honeypots
  86. 2017-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] more on honeypots
  87. 2017-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Internet of things DDOS threat
  88. 2017-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Hackers and Honepots
  89. 2017-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Mozilla and DRM
  90. 2017-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] WebRTC coding in html5
  91. 2017-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] WebRTC coding in html5
  92. 2017-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] vim and the free software world
  93. 2017-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Robotics
  94. 2017-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Researchers use artificial neural network to
  95. 2017-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] power grids in peril
  96. 2017-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] New Neuronet theory
  97. 2017-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Linguistics
  98. 2017-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Guess this painting!!
  99. 2017-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] lions and tigers and snow leopards
  100. 2017-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Movie of the Week
  101. 2017-02-10 Paul Robert Marino <prmarino1-at-gmail.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Microsofts new stratergy to beat linux | | I
  102. 2017-02-12 ruben <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] anyone know what is this
  103. 2017-02-12 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] anyone know what is this
  104. 2017-02-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] fellowship positition
  105. 2017-02-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] aptget
  106. 2017-02-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Trump Economics and Lou Costello teaches about a
  107. 2017-02-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Guess this painting!!
  108. 2017-02-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Name the artist and the work..
  109. 2017-02-13 Gabor Szabo <gabor-at-szabgab.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] [Perlweekly] #290 - Interview at FOSDEM
  110. 2017-02-01 Dirk Jagdmann <doj-at-cubic.org> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Passing encrypted base64 encoded value via href
  111. 2017-02-13 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Guess this painting!!
  112. 2017-02-13 ruben <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Guess this painting!!
  113. 2017-02-13 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Guess this painting!!
  114. 2017-02-13 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Guess this painting!!
  115. 2017-02-13 ISOC-NY announcements <announce-at-lists.isoc-ny.org> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS]
  116. 2017-02-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Patent Trolls Delux
  117. 2017-02-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Microsofts new stratergy to beat linux | | I
  118. 2017-02-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: [isoc-ny] Fwd: EVENT TONIGHT: The Internet of
  119. 2017-02-13 From: "Mancini, Sabin (DFS)" <Sabin.Mancini-at-dfs.ny.gov> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: [isoc-ny] Fwd: EVENT TONIGHT: The Internet
  120. 2017-02-13 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: [isoc-ny] Fwd: EVENT TONIGHT: The Internet
  121. 2017-02-13 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Guess this painting!!
  122. 2017-02-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Geological floods
  123. 2017-02-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Amature Radio
  124. 2017-02-13 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Amature Radio
  125. 2017-02-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Artificial Intelligence Gets Aggressive Without
  126. 2017-02-14 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Geological floods
  127. 2017-02-14 From: "American Museum of Natural History" <mat-at-amnh.org> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Tomorrow Is The Last Day for MAT Applications
  128. 2017-02-14 From: "IEEE The Institute"<tialert-at-ieee.org> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] The Institute Online: Can Amazon's Echo Device Help
  129. 2017-02-14 Charlotte Danes <charlotted-at-schoolingadvisor.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] NYLXS - The Free Software Institute
  130. 2017-02-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Just a reminder
  131. 2017-02-15 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society <noreply-at-embs.org> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] EMBC Paper Submission DEADLINE is
  132. 2017-02-15 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] aptget
  133. 2017-02-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] aptget
  134. 2017-02-16 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] aptget
  135. 2017-02-16 ruben <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] chew on this
  136. 2017-02-16 ruben <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Next Picute
  137. 2017-02-16 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Next Picture
  138. 2017-02-16 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] aptget
  139. 2017-02-16 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] aptget
  140. 2017-02-16 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Next Picture
  141. 2017-02-16 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: Sherry
  142. 2017-02-16 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Name the Artist and the Work
  143. 2017-02-16 From: "Mancini, Sabin (DFS)" <Sabin.Mancini-at-dfs.ny.gov> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] aptget: | | it was not wasted !
  144. 2017-02-16 From: "Mancini, Sabin (DFS)" <Sabin.Mancini-at-dfs.ny.gov> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] aptget: | | RS: I thought you were an OpenSuse
  145. 2017-02-16 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] aptget: | | RS: I thought you were an OpenSuse
  146. 2017-02-16 From: "Mancini, Sabin (DFS)" <Sabin.Mancini-at-dfs.ny.gov> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] aptget: | | RS: . Audience was about 70% male (
  147. 2017-02-16 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Next Picture
  148. 2017-02-16 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Next Picture
  149. 2017-02-16 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Next Picture
  150. 2017-02-16 ISOC-NY announcements <announce-at-lists.isoc-ny.org> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] [isoc-ny] WEBCAST TONIGHT: The Future of Digital
  151. 2017-02-17 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Living with NASA
  152. 2017-02-17 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] The MTA is so fucked up
  153. 2017-02-17 From: "Mancini, Sabin (DFS)" <Sabin.Mancini-at-dfs.ny.gov> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] The MTA is so f****d up | | Join the MTA and
  154. 2017-02-17 ruben <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: [isoc-ny] WEBCAST TONIGHT: The Future of
  155. 2017-02-17 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] aptget: | | it was not wasted !
  156. 2017-02-19 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] (forw) QA & Tech Support Engineer (NYC)
  157. 2017-02-20 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Duplicity (2009 film)
  158. 2017-02-20 Gabor Szabo <gabor-at-szabgab.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] [Perlweekly] #291 - FOSDEM videos
  159. 2017-02-20 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] movie of the week
  160. 2017-02-21 ruben <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] technologywith fossils
  161. 2017-02-22 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] exo-planets
  162. 2017-02-22 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] in other news
  163. 2017-02-22 Nicholas Rodin <nikbbwil-at-icloud.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] in other news
  164. 2017-02-22 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] in other news
  165. 2017-02-22 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] in other news
  166. 2017-02-22 James E Keenan <jkeen-at-verizon.net> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] February social meeting
  167. 2017-02-23 From: "Mancini, Sabin (DFS)" <Sabin.Mancini-at-dfs.ny.gov> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] | | | Nick: You cannot be removed without
  168. 2017-02-23 Nicholas Rodin <nikbbwil-at-icloud.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] | | | Nick: You cannot be removed without
  169. 2017-02-23 From: "Mancini, Sabin (DFS)" <Sabin.Mancini-at-dfs.ny.gov> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] | | | Nick: I get way TOO many emails TO both
  170. 2017-02-23 Nicholas Rodin <nikbbwil-at-icloud.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] | | | Nick: I get way TOO many emails TO both
  171. 2017-02-23 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] | | | Nick: I get way TOO many emails TO both
  172. 2017-02-23 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] | | | Nick: I get way TOO many emails TO both
  173. 2017-02-24 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] decision making tree for a euler walk
  174. 2017-02-24 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society <noreply-at-embs.org> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Your EMB Weekly Newsletter is HERE!!!!
  175. 2017-02-28 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Peer Review
  176. 2017-02-27 James E Keenan <jkeen-at-verizon.net> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] February social meeting + upcoming
  177. 2017-02-28 From: "IEEE The Institute"<tialert-at-ieee.org> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] The Institute Online: Straight Out of Sci-Fi,
  178. 2017-02-28 Don Brinkman <Don.Brinkman-at-gov.ab.ca> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] visit

NYLXS are Do'ers and the first step of Doing is Joining! Join NYLXS and make a difference in your community today!