Fri Mar 29 09:04:03 2024
EVENTS
 FREE
SOFTWARE
INSTITUTE

POLITICS
JOBS
MEMBERS'
CORNER

MAILING
LIST

NYLXS Mailing Lists and Archives
NYLXS Members have a lot to say and share but we don't keep many secrets. Join the Hangout Mailing List and say your peice.

DATE 2020-02-01

HANGOUT

2024-03-29 | 2024-02-29 | 2024-01-29 | 2023-12-29 | 2023-11-29 | 2023-10-29 | 2023-09-29 | 2023-08-29 | 2023-07-29 | 2023-06-29 | 2023-05-29 | 2023-04-29 | 2023-03-29 | 2023-02-28 | 2023-01-28 | 2022-12-28 | 2022-11-28 | 2022-10-28 | 2022-09-28 | 2022-08-28 | 2022-07-28 | 2022-06-28 | 2022-05-28 | 2022-04-28 | 2022-03-28 | 2022-02-28 | 2022-01-28 | 2021-12-28 | 2021-11-28 | 2021-10-28 | 2021-09-28 | 2021-08-28 | 2021-07-28 | 2021-06-28 | 2021-05-28 | 2021-04-28 | 2021-03-28 | 2021-02-28 | 2021-01-28 | 2020-12-28 | 2020-11-28 | 2020-10-28 | 2020-09-28 | 2020-08-28 | 2020-07-28 | 2020-06-28 | 2020-05-28 | 2020-04-28 | 2020-03-28 | 2020-02-28 | 2020-01-28 | 2019-12-28 | 2019-11-28 | 2019-10-28 | 2019-09-28 | 2019-08-28 | 2019-07-28 | 2019-06-28 | 2019-05-28 | 2019-04-28 | 2019-03-28 | 2019-02-28 | 2019-01-28 | 2018-12-28 | 2018-11-28 | 2018-10-28 | 2018-09-28 | 2018-08-28 | 2018-07-28 | 2018-06-28 | 2018-05-28 | 2018-04-28 | 2018-03-28 | 2018-02-28 | 2018-01-28 | 2017-12-28 | 2017-11-28 | 2017-10-28 | 2017-09-28 | 2017-08-28 | 2017-07-28 | 2017-06-28 | 2017-05-28 | 2017-04-28 | 2017-03-28 | 2017-02-28 | 2017-01-28 | 2016-12-28 | 2016-11-28 | 2016-10-28 | 2016-09-28 | 2016-08-28 | 2016-07-28 | 2016-06-28 | 2016-05-28 | 2016-04-28 | 2016-03-28 | 2016-02-28 | 2016-01-28 | 2015-12-28 | 2015-11-28 | 2015-10-28 | 2015-09-28 | 2015-08-28 | 2015-07-28 | 2015-06-28 | 2015-05-28 | 2015-04-28 | 2015-03-28 | 2015-02-28 | 2015-01-28 | 2014-12-28 | 2014-11-28 | 2014-10-28 | 2014-09-28 | 2014-08-28 | 2014-07-28 | 2014-06-28 | 2014-05-28 | 2014-04-28 | 2014-03-28 | 2014-02-28 | 2014-01-28 | 2013-12-28 | 2013-11-28 | 2013-10-28 | 2013-09-28 | 2013-08-28 | 2013-07-28 | 2013-06-28 | 2013-05-28 | 2013-04-28 | 2013-03-28 | 2013-02-28 | 2013-01-28 | 2012-12-28 | 2012-11-28 | 2012-10-28 | 2012-09-28 | 2012-08-28 | 2012-07-28 | 2012-06-28 | 2012-05-28 | 2012-04-28 | 2012-03-28 | 2012-02-28 | 2012-01-28 | 2011-12-28 | 2011-11-28 | 2011-10-28 | 2011-09-28 | 2011-08-28 | 2011-07-28 | 2011-06-28 | 2011-05-28 | 2011-04-28 | 2011-03-28 | 2011-02-28 | 2011-01-28 | 2010-12-28 | 2010-11-28 | 2010-10-28 | 2010-09-28 | 2010-08-28 | 2010-07-28 | 2010-06-28 | 2010-05-28 | 2010-04-28 | 2010-03-28 | 2010-02-28 | 2010-01-28 | 2009-12-28 | 2009-11-28 | 2009-10-28 | 2009-09-28 | 2009-08-28 | 2009-07-28 | 2009-06-28 | 2009-05-28 | 2009-04-28 | 2009-03-28 | 2009-02-28 | 2009-01-28 | 2008-12-28 | 2008-11-28 | 2008-10-28 | 2008-09-28 | 2008-08-28 | 2008-07-28 | 2008-06-28 | 2008-05-28 | 2008-04-28 | 2008-03-28 | 2008-02-28 | 2008-01-28 | 2007-12-28 | 2007-11-28 | 2007-10-28 | 2007-09-28 | 2007-08-28 | 2007-07-28 | 2007-06-28 | 2007-05-28 | 2007-04-28 | 2007-03-28 | 2007-02-28 | 2007-01-28 | 2006-12-28 | 2006-11-28 | 2006-10-28 | 2006-09-28 | 2006-08-28 | 2006-07-28 | 2006-06-28 | 2006-05-28 | 2006-04-28 | 2006-03-28 | 2006-02-28 | 2006-01-28 | 2005-12-28 | 2005-11-28 | 2005-10-28 | 2005-09-28 | 2005-08-28 | 2005-07-28 | 2005-06-28 | 2005-05-28 | 2005-04-28 | 2005-03-28 | 2005-02-28 | 2005-01-28 | 2004-12-28 | 2004-11-28 | 2004-10-28 | 2004-09-28 | 2004-08-28 | 2004-07-28 | 2004-06-28 | 2004-05-28 | 2004-04-28 | 2004-03-28 | 2004-02-28 | 2004-01-28 | 2003-12-28 | 2003-11-28 | 2003-10-28 | 2003-09-28 | 2003-08-28 | 2003-07-28 | 2003-06-28 | 2003-05-28 | 2003-04-28 | 2003-03-28 | 2003-02-28 | 2003-01-28 | 2002-12-28 | 2002-11-28 | 2002-10-28 | 2002-09-28 | 2002-08-28 | 2002-07-28 | 2002-06-28 | 2002-05-28 | 2002-04-28 | 2002-03-28 | 2002-02-28 | 2002-01-28 | 2001-12-28 | 2001-11-28 | 2001-10-28 | 2001-09-28 | 2001-08-28 | 2001-07-28 | 2001-06-28 | 2001-05-28 | 2001-04-28 | 2001-03-28 | 2001-02-28 | 2001-01-28 | 2000-12-28 | 2000-11-28 | 2000-10-28 | 2000-09-28 | 2000-08-28 | 2000-07-28 | 2000-06-28 | 2000-05-28 | 2000-04-28 | 2000-03-28 | 2000-02-28 | 2000-01-28 | 1999-12-28

Key: Value:

Key: Value:

MESSAGE
DATE 2020-02-01
FROM Ruben Safir
SUBJECT Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Pharm Economcis and Chains killing pts (NY Times)
From hangout-bounces-at-nylxs.com Sat Feb 1 21:04:27 2020
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (www2.mrbrklyn.com [96.57.23.82])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48EFE16113A;
Sat, 1 Feb 2020 21:04:27 -0500 (EST)
X-Original-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Delivered-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6AF9161132
for ; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 21:04:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from panix2.panix.com (panix2.panix.com [166.84.1.2])
by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489Dm45cSPz1d4D;
Sat, 1 Feb 2020 21:04:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: by panix2.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 20529)
id 489Dm43gXkz1ZW7; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 21:04:20 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2020 21:04:20 -0500
From: Ruben Safir
To: Rick Moen
Message-ID: <20200202020420.GA10407-at-panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: NYLXS
Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Pharm Economcis and Chains killing pts (NY Times)
X-BeenThere: hangout-at-nylxs.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NYLXS Tech Talk and Politics
List-Unsubscribe: ,

List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,

Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0593070582=="
Errors-To: hangout-bounces-at-nylxs.com
Sender: "Hangout"

--===============0593070582==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

By Ellen Gabler

Jan. 31, 2020

For Alyssa Watrous, the medication mix-up meant a pounding headache,
nausea and dizziness. In September, Ms. Watrous, a 17-year-old from
Connecticut, was about to take another asthma pill when she realized
CVS had mistakenly given her blood pressure medication intended
for someone else.

Edward Walker, 38, landed in an emergency room, his eyes swollen
and burning after he put drops in them for five days in November
2018 to treat a mild irritation. A Walgreens in Illinois had
accidentally supplied him with ear drops ? not eye drops.

For Mary Scheuerman, 85, the error was discovered only when she
was dying in a Florida hospital in December 2018. A Publix pharmacy
had dispensed a powerful chemotherapy drug instead of the antidepressant
her doctor had prescribed. She died about two weeks later.

The people least surprised by such mistakes are pharmacists working
in some of the nation?s biggest retail chains.

In letters to state regulatory boards and in interviews with The
New York Times, many pharmacists at companies like CVS, Rite Aid
and Walgreens described understaffed and chaotic workplaces where
they said it had become difficult to perform their jobs safely,
putting the public at risk of medication errors.

They struggle to fill prescriptions, give flu shots, tend the
drive-through, answer phones, work the register, counsel patients
and call doctors and insurance companies, they said ? all the while
racing to meet corporate performance metrics that they characterized
as unreasonable and unsafe in an industry squeezed to do more with
less.

?I am a danger to the public working for CVS,? one pharmacist wrote
in an anonymous letter to the Texas State Board of Pharmacy in
April.

?The amount of busywork we must do while verifying prescriptions
is absolutely dangerous,? another wrote to the Pennsylvania board
in February. ?Mistakes are going to be made and the patients are
going to be the ones suffering.?

[Read how you can protect yourself against medication errors.]

State boards and associations in at least two dozen states have
heard from distraught pharmacists, interviews and records show,
while some doctors complain that pharmacies bombard them with
requests for refills that patients have not asked for and should
not receive. Such refills are closely tracked by pharmacy chains
and can factor into employee bonuses.

Michael Jackson, chief executive of the Florida Pharmacy Association,
said the number of complaints from members related to staffing cuts
and worries about patient safety had become ?overwhelming? in the
past year. ImageCVS Health ranks eighth on the Fortune 500 list
and has nearly 10,000 pharmacies across the United States. CVS
Health ranks eighth on the Fortune 500 list and has nearly 10,000
pharmacies across the United States.Credit...Jeenah Moon for The
New York Times

The American Psychiatric Association is particularly concerned
about CVS, America?s eighth-largest company, which it says routinely
ignores doctors? explicit instructions to dispense limited amounts
of medication to mental health patients. The pharmacy?s practice
of providing three-month supplies may inadvertently lead more
patients to attempt suicide by overdosing, the association said.

?Clearly it is financially in their best interest to dispense as
many pills as they can get paid for,? said Dr. Bruce Schwartz, a
psychiatrist in New York and the group?s president.

A spokesman for CVS said it had created a system to address the
issue, but Dr. Schwartz said complaints persisted.

Regulating the chains ? five rank among the nation?s 100 largest
companies ? has proved difficult for state pharmacy boards, which
oversee the industry but sometimes allow company representatives
to hold seats. Florida?s nine-member board, for instance, includes
a lawyer for CVS and a director of pharmacy affairs at Walgreens.

Aside from creating potential conflicts of interest, the industry
presence can stifle complaints. ?We are afraid to speak up and lose
our jobs,? one pharmacist wrote anonymously last year in response
to a survey by the Missouri Board of Pharmacy. ?PLEASE HELP."

Officials from several state boards told The Times they had limited
authority to dictate how companies ran their businesses. Efforts
by legislatures in California and elsewhere have been unsuccessful
in substantially changing how pharmacies operate.

A majority of state boards do not require pharmacies to report
errors, let alone conduct thorough investigations when they occur.
Most investigations focus on pharmacists, not the conditions in
their workplaces.

In public meetings, boards in at least two states have instructed
pharmacists to quit or speak up if they believe conditions are
unsafe. But pharmacists said they feared retaliation, knowing they
could easily be replaced.

The industry has been squeezed amid declining drug reimbursement
rates and cost pressures from administrators of prescription drug
plans. Consolidation, meanwhile, has left only a few major players.
About 70 percent of prescriptions nationwide are dispensed by chain
drugstores, supermarkets or retailers like Walmart, according to
a 2019 Drug Channels Institute report.

CVS garners a quarter of the country?s total prescription revenue
and dispenses more than a billion prescriptions a year. Walgreens
captures almost 20 percent. Walmart, Kroger and Rite Aid fall next
in line among brick-and-mortar stores.

In statements, the pharmacy chains said patient safety was of utmost
concern, with staffing carefully set to ensure accurate dispensing.
Investment in technology such as e-prescribing has increased safety
and efficiency, the companies said. They denied that pharmacists
were under extreme pressure or faced reprisals.

?When a pharmacist has a legitimate concern about working conditions,
we make every effort to address that concern in good faith,? CVS
said in a statement. Walgreens cited its confidential employee
hotline and said it made ?clear to all pharmacists that they should
never work beyond what they believe is advisable.?

Errors, the companies said, were regrettable but rare; they declined
to provide data about mistakes.

The National Association of Chain Drug Stores, a trade group, said
that ?pharmacies consider even one prescription error to be one
too many? and ?seek continuous improvement.? The organization said
it was wrong to ?assume cause-effect relationships? between errors
and pharmacists? workload.

The specifics and severity of errors are nearly impossible to tally.
Aside from lax reporting requirements, many mistakes never become
public because companies settle with victims or their families,
often requiring a confidentiality agreement. A CVS form for staff
members to report errors asks whether the patient is a ?media
threat,? according to a photo provided to The Times. CVS said in
a statement it would not provide details on what it called its
?escalation process.?

The last comprehensive study of medication errors was over a decade
ago: The Institute of Medicine estimated in 2006 that such mistakes
harmed at least 1.5 million Americans each year.

Jonathan Lewis said he waited on hold with CVS for 40 minutes last
summer, after discovering his antidepressant prescription had been
refilled with another drug.

Mr. Lewis, 47, suspected something was wrong when he felt short of
breath and extremely dizzy. Looking closely at the medication ?
and turning to Google ? he figured out it was estrogen, not an
antidepressant, which patients should not abruptly quit.

?It was very apparent they were very understaffed,? Mr. Lewis said,
recalling long lines inside the Las Vegas store and at the
drive-through when he picked up the prescription. Pharmacists have
written to state regulatory boards about their safety concerns.

?My fellow pharmacists and pharmacy technicians are at our breaking
point. Chain pharmacy practices are preventing us from taking care
of our patients and putting them at risk of dangerous medication
errors.? New Jersey pharmacist

?The mistakes I have seen occur in this environment are both
frightening and understandable when we are under the gun to perform
the impossible. I?ve had a technician mix two strengths of a critical
blood pressure medication.? South Carolina pharmacist

?A fatigued and distracted pharmacist in a fast-paced, chaotic
environment is much more likely to make an error. The harm from a
medication error ranges from being a slight inconvenience to being
fatal.? Texas pharmacist

?Something needs to be done about this before lives are lost. Our
patients depend on us for their safety and wellness. We have to
live up to their expectations.? North Carolina pharmacist

?We are being asked to do things that we know at a gut level are
dangerous. If we won?t or can?t do them, our employers will find
someone else who will, and they will likely try to pay them less
for the same work.? South Carolina pharmacist

?We are forced to harass patients at check out to fill unnecessary
meds, request unnecessary refills, and to enroll in automatic fill
programs that result in dangerous duplications and meds to be filled
that were intended for single time use.? Missouri pharmacist Too
Much, Too Fast

The day before Wesley Hickman quit his job as a pharmacist at CVS,
he worked a 13-hour shift with no breaks for lunch or dinner, he
said.

As the only pharmacist on duty that day at the Leland, N.C., store,
Dr. Hickman filled 552 prescriptions ? about one every minute and
25 seconds ? while counseling patients, giving shots, making calls
and staffing the drive-through, he said. Partway through his shift
the next day, in December 2018, he called his manager.

?I said, ?I am not going to work in a situation that is unsafe.?
I shut the door and left,? said Dr. Hickman, who now runs an
independent pharmacy.

Dr. Hickman felt that the multitude of required tasks distracted
from his most important jobs: filling prescriptions accurately and
counseling patients. He had begged his district manager to schedule
more pharmacists, but the request was denied, he said.

CVS said it could not comment on the ?individual concerns? of a
former employee.

With nearly 10,000 pharmacies across the country, CVS is the largest
chain and among the most aggressive in imposing performance metrics,
pharmacists said. Both CVS and Walgreens tie bonuses to achieving
them, according to company documents.

Nearly everything is tracked and scrutinized: phone calls to
patients, the time it takes to fill a prescription, the number of
immunizations given, the number of customers signing up for 90-day
supplies of medication, to name a few.

The fact that tasks are being tracked is not the problem, pharmacists
say, as customers can benefit from services like reminders for flu
shots and refills. The issue is that employees are heavily evaluated
on hitting targets, they say, including in areas they cannot control.

In Missouri, dozens of pharmacists said in a recent survey by the
state board that the focus on metrics was a threat to patient safety
and their own job security.

?Metrics put unnecessary pressure on pharmacy staff to fill
prescriptions as fast as possible, resulting in errors,? one
pharmacist wrote.

Of the nearly 1,000 pharmacists who took the survey, 60 percent
said they ?agree? or ?strongly agree? that they ?feel pressured or
intimidated to meet standards or metrics that may interfere with
safe patient care.? About 60 percent of respondents worked for
retail chains, as opposed to hospitals or independent pharmacies.

Surveys in Maryland and Tennessee revealed similar concerns.

The specific goals are not made public, and can vary by store, but
internal CVS documents reviewed by The Times show what was expected
in some locations last year.

Staff members were supposed to persuade 65 percent of patients
picking up prescriptions to sign up for automatic refills, 55
percent to switch to 90-day supplies from 30-day, and 75 percent
to have the pharmacy contact their doctor with a ?proactive refill
request? if a prescription was expiring or had no refills, the
documents show.

Pharmacy staff members are also expected to call dozens of patients
each day, based on a computer-generated list. They are assessed on
the number of patients they reach, and the number who agree to
their requests.

Representatives from CVS and Walgreens said metrics were meant to
provide better patient care, not penalize pharmacists. Some are
related to reimbursements to pharmacies by insurance companies and
the government. CVS said it had halved its number of metrics over
the past 18 months.

But dozens of pharmacists described the emphasis on metrics as
burdensome, and said they faced backlash for failing to meet the
goals or suggesting they were unrealistic or unsafe.

?Any dissent perceived by corporate is met with a target placed on
one?s back,? an unnamed pharmacist wrote to the South Carolina
board last year.

In comments to state boards and interviews with The Times, pharmacists
explained how staffing cuts had led to longer shifts, often with
no break to use the restroom or eat.

?I certainly make more mistakes,? another South Carolina pharmacist
wrote to the board. ?I had two misfills in three years with the
previous staffing and now I make 10-12 per year (that are caught).?

Much of the blame for understaffing has been directed at pressure
from companies that manage drug plans for health insurers and
Medicare.

Acting as middlemen between drug manufacturers, insurers and
pharmacies, the companies ? known as pharmacy benefit managers, or
P.B.M.s ? negotiate prices and channel to pharmacies the more than
$300 billion spent on outpatient prescription drugs in the United
States annually.

The benefit managers charge fees to pharmacies, and have been widely
criticized for a lack of transparency and applying fees inconsistently.
In a letter to the Department of Health and Human Services in
September, a bipartisan group of senators noted an ?extraordinary
45,000 percent increase? in fees paid by pharmacies from 2010 to
2017.

While benefit managers have caused economic upheaval in the industry,
some pharmacy chains are players in that market too: CVS Health
owns CVS Caremark, the largest benefit manager; Walgreens Boots
Alliance has a partnership with Prime Therapeutics; Rite Aid owns
a P.B.M., too.

The Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, the trade group
representing benefit managers, contends that they make prescriptions
more affordable, and pushes back against the notion that P.B.M.s
are responsible for pressures on pharmacies, instead of a competitive
market. Pharmacists have written to state regulatory boards about
their safety concerns.

?I am expected to make 50-100 phone calls in addition to answering
phone calls, consultations, vaccinations and prescription verification.
This has resulted in dispensing errors. A member of our staff
misfilled a narcotic prescription for immediate release rather than
extended release which resulted luckily in only patient fatigue,
but it could have easily been deadly.? South Carolina pharmacist

?Thank the Lord I have not had any life-threatening misfills, but
I have had a number of ?minor? misfills mostly due to having to be
responsible for so many duties at once and constantly being pulled
away from verification to multitask.? South Carolina pharmacist

?I'm confident that I?ve had dispensing errors which have left my
pharmacy, but I was working too fast in order to meet our precious
metrics to notice them. Let's hope nobody suffered or died because
of it.? Missouri pharmacist

?I am currently a pharmacist working at CVS. I am writing to you
anonymously today as I fear for losing my job should my identity
be known; however, I feel it is my duty to bring our current
conditions to the board of pharmacy.? North Carolina pharmacist

?I've refrained from drinking fluids due to the fact that I couldn't
get to the restroom. I have ended up with kidney stones and infections
on more than one occasion.? South Carolina pharmacist

?There is so much pressure to work so quickly that there are nights
I go home just hoping I haven't made a mistake in all the craziness.
I work 8-10 hour shifts without a single break. Some days I go an
entire shift without finding any time to leave to use the restroom.?
Missouri pharmacist Falling Through the Cracks

Dr. Mark Lopatin, a rheumatologist in Pennsylvania, says he is
inundated with refill requests for almost every prescription he
writes. At times Dr. Lopatin prescribes drugs intended only for a
brief treatment ? a steroid to treat a flare-up of arthritis, for
instance.

But within days or weeks, he said, the pharmacy sends a refill
request even though the prescription did not call for one. Each
time, his office looks at the patient?s chart to confirm the request
is warranted. About half are not, he said.

Aside from creating unnecessary work, Dr. Lopatin believes, the
flood of requests poses a safety issue. ?When you are bombarded
with refill after refill, it?s easy for things to fall through the
cracks, despite your best efforts,? he said.

Pharmacists told The Times that many unwanted refill requests were
generated by automated systems designed in part to increase sales.
Others were the result of phone calls from pharmacists, who said
they faced pressure to reach quotas.

In February, a CVS pharmacist wrote to the South Carolina board
that cold calls to doctors should stop, explaining that a call was
considered ?successful? only if the doctor agreed to the refill.

?What this means is that we are overwhelming doctor?s office staff
with constant calls, and patients are often kept on medication that
is unneeded for extended periods of time,? the pharmacist wrote.

CVS says outreach to patients and doctors can help patients stay
up-to-date on their medications, and lead to lower costs and better
health.

Dr. Rachel Poliquin, a psychiatrist in North Carolina who says she
constantly gets refill requests, estimates that about 90 percent
of her patients say they never asked their pharmacy to contact her.

While Dr. Poliquin has a policy that patients must contact her
directly for more medication, she worries about clinics where
prescriptions may get rubber-stamped in a flurry of requests. Then
patients ? especially those who are elderly or mentally ill ? may
continue taking medication unnecessarily, she said.

The American Psychiatric Association has been trying to tackle a
related problem after hearing from members that CVS was giving
patients larger supplies of medication than doctors had directed.

While it is common for pharmacies to dispense 90 days? worth of
maintenance medications ? to treat chronic conditions like high
blood pressure or diabetes ? doctors say it is inappropriate for
other drugs.

For example, patients with bipolar disorder are often prescribed
lithium, a potentially lethal drug if taken in excess. It is common
for psychiatrists to start a patient on a low dose or to limit the
number of pills dispensed at once, especially if the person is
considered a suicide risk.

But increasingly, the psychiatric association has heard from members
that smaller quantities specified on prescriptions are being ignored,
particularly by CVS, according to Dr. Schwartz, the group?s president.

CVS has created a system where doctors can register and request
that 90-day supplies not be dispensed to their patients. But doctors
report that the registry has not solved the problem, Dr. Schwartz
said. In a statement, CVS said it continued to ?refine and enhance?
the program.

Dr. Charles Denby, a psychiatrist in Rhode Island, became so
concerned by the practice that he started stamping prescriptions,
?AT MONTHLY INTERVALS ONLY.? Despite those explicit instructions,
Dr. Denby said, he received faxes from CVS saying his patients had
asked for ? and been given ? 90-day supplies.

Dr. Denby, who retired in December, said it was a ?baldfaced lie?
that the patients had asked for the medication, providing statements
from patients saying as much.

?I am disgusted with this,? said Dr. Denby, who worries that patients
may attempt suicide with excess medication. ?There are going to be
people dead only because they have enough medication to do the deed
with.? ?We Already Have Systems in Place?

Alton James never learned how the mistake came about that he says
killed his 85-year-old mother, Mary Scheuerman, in 2018.

He knows he picked up her prescription at the pharmacy in a Publix
supermarket in Lakeland, Fla. He knows he gave her a pill each
morning. He knows that after six days, she turned pale, her blood
pressure dropped and she was rushed to the hospital. Image Mary
Scheuerman died in December 2018 after taking a powerful chemotherapy
drug mistakenly dispensed by a Publix pharmacy. Her son said she
was supposed to have received an antidepressant.

Mr. James remembers a doctor telling him his mother?s blood had a
toxic level of methotrexate, a drug often used to treat cancer.
But Mrs. Scheuerman didn?t have cancer. She was supposed to be
taking an antidepressant. Mr. James said a pharmacy employee later
confirmed that someone had mistakenly dispensed methotrexate.

Five days after entering the hospital, Mrs. Scheuerman died, with
organ failure listed as the lead cause, according to medical records
cited by Mr. James.

The Institute for Safe Medication Practices has warned about
methotrexate, listing it as a ?high-alert medication? that can be
deadly when taken incorrectly. Mr. James reported the pharmacy?s
error to the group, writing that he wanted to raise awareness about
the drug and push Publix, one of the country?s largest supermarket
chains, to ?clean up? its pharmacy division, according to a copy
of his report provided to The Times. Image Trexall, a brand name
for the drug methotrexate, can be used to treat cancer.

The company acknowledged the mistake and offered a settlement, Mr.
James wrote, but would not discuss how to avoid future errors,
saying, ?We already have systems in place.?

Last September, Mr. James told The Times that Publix wanted him to
sign a settlement agreement that would prevent him from speaking
further about his mother?s death. Mr. James has since declined to
comment, saying that the matter was ?amicably resolved.?

A spokeswoman for Publix said privacy laws prevented the company
from commenting on specific patients.

It can be difficult for patients and their families to decide
whether to accept a settlement.

Last summer, CVS offered to compensate Kelsey and Donavan Sullivan
after a pediatrician discovered the reflux medication they had been
giving their 4-month-old for two months was actually a steroid. To
be safely weaned, the baby had to keep taking it for two weeks
after the error was discovered.

?It was like he was coming out of a fog,? Mrs. Sullivan recalled.

The couple, from Minnesota, are still considering a settlement but
haven?t agreed to anything because they don?t know what long-term
consequences their son might face.

The kinds of errors and how they occur vary considerably.

The paper stapled to a CVS bag containing medication for Ms. Watrous,
the Connecticut teenager with asthma, listed her correct name and
medication, but the bottle inside had someone else?s name.

Directions on the prescription for Mr. Walker, the Illinois man
who got ear drops instead of eye drops from Walgreens, were clear:
?Instill 1 drop in both eyes every 6 hours.? He later saw the box:
?For use in ears only.?

In September, Stefanie Davis, 31, got the right medicine, Adderall,
but the wrong dose. She pulled over on the interstate after feeling
short of breath and dizzy with blurred vision. The pills, dispensed
by a Walgreens in Sun City Center, Fla., were each 30 milligrams
instead of her usual 20. She is fighting with Walgreens to cover
a $900 bill for her visit to an emergency room. Fixes That Fall
Short

State boards and legislatures have wrestled with how to regulate
the industry. Some states have adopted laws, for instance introducing
mandatory lunch breaks or limiting the number of technicians a
pharmacist can supervise.

But the laws aren?t always followed, can be difficult to enforce
or can fail to address broader problems.

The National Association of Chain Drug Stores says some state boards
are blocking meaningful change. The group, for instance, wants to
free up pharmacists from some tasks by allowing technicians, who
have less training, to do more.

It also supports efforts to change the insurance reimbursement
model for pharmacies. Health care services provided by pharmacists
to patients, such as prescribing birth control, are not consistently
covered by insurers or allowed in all states. But it has been
difficult to find consensus to change federal and state regulations.

While those debates continue, some state boards are trying to hold
companies more accountable.

Often when an error is reported to a board, action is taken against
the pharmacist, an obvious target. It is less common for a company
to be scrutinized.

The South Carolina board discussed in November how to more thoroughly
investigate conditions after a mistake. It also published a statement
discouraging quotas and encouraging ?employers to value patient
safety over operational efficiency and financial targets.?

California passed a law saying no pharmacist could be required to
work alone, but it has been largely ignored since taking effect
last year, according to leaders of a pharmacists? union. The state
board is trying to clarify the law?s requirements.

In Illinois, a new law requires breaks for pharmacists and potential
penalties for companies that do not provide a safe working environment.
The law was in response to a 2016 Chicago Tribune investigation
revealing that pharmacies failed to warn patients about dangerous
drug combinations.

Some states are trying to make changes behind closed doors. After
seeing results of its survey last year, the Missouri board invited
companies to private meetings early this year to answer questions
about errors, staffing and patient safety.

CVS and Walgreens said they would attend.

Research was contributed by Susan C. Beachy, Jack Begg, Alain
Delaquérière and Sheelagh McNeill.


--===============0593070582==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Hangout mailing list
Hangout-at-nylxs.com
http://lists.mrbrklyn.com/mailman/listinfo/hangout

--===============0593070582==--

--===============0593070582==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

By Ellen Gabler

Jan. 31, 2020

For Alyssa Watrous, the medication mix-up meant a pounding headache,
nausea and dizziness. In September, Ms. Watrous, a 17-year-old from
Connecticut, was about to take another asthma pill when she realized
CVS had mistakenly given her blood pressure medication intended
for someone else.

Edward Walker, 38, landed in an emergency room, his eyes swollen
and burning after he put drops in them for five days in November
2018 to treat a mild irritation. A Walgreens in Illinois had
accidentally supplied him with ear drops ? not eye drops.

For Mary Scheuerman, 85, the error was discovered only when she
was dying in a Florida hospital in December 2018. A Publix pharmacy
had dispensed a powerful chemotherapy drug instead of the antidepressant
her doctor had prescribed. She died about two weeks later.

The people least surprised by such mistakes are pharmacists working
in some of the nation?s biggest retail chains.

In letters to state regulatory boards and in interviews with The
New York Times, many pharmacists at companies like CVS, Rite Aid
and Walgreens described understaffed and chaotic workplaces where
they said it had become difficult to perform their jobs safely,
putting the public at risk of medication errors.

They struggle to fill prescriptions, give flu shots, tend the
drive-through, answer phones, work the register, counsel patients
and call doctors and insurance companies, they said ? all the while
racing to meet corporate performance metrics that they characterized
as unreasonable and unsafe in an industry squeezed to do more with
less.

?I am a danger to the public working for CVS,? one pharmacist wrote
in an anonymous letter to the Texas State Board of Pharmacy in
April.

?The amount of busywork we must do while verifying prescriptions
is absolutely dangerous,? another wrote to the Pennsylvania board
in February. ?Mistakes are going to be made and the patients are
going to be the ones suffering.?

[Read how you can protect yourself against medication errors.]

State boards and associations in at least two dozen states have
heard from distraught pharmacists, interviews and records show,
while some doctors complain that pharmacies bombard them with
requests for refills that patients have not asked for and should
not receive. Such refills are closely tracked by pharmacy chains
and can factor into employee bonuses.

Michael Jackson, chief executive of the Florida Pharmacy Association,
said the number of complaints from members related to staffing cuts
and worries about patient safety had become ?overwhelming? in the
past year. ImageCVS Health ranks eighth on the Fortune 500 list
and has nearly 10,000 pharmacies across the United States. CVS
Health ranks eighth on the Fortune 500 list and has nearly 10,000
pharmacies across the United States.Credit...Jeenah Moon for The
New York Times

The American Psychiatric Association is particularly concerned
about CVS, America?s eighth-largest company, which it says routinely
ignores doctors? explicit instructions to dispense limited amounts
of medication to mental health patients. The pharmacy?s practice
of providing three-month supplies may inadvertently lead more
patients to attempt suicide by overdosing, the association said.

?Clearly it is financially in their best interest to dispense as
many pills as they can get paid for,? said Dr. Bruce Schwartz, a
psychiatrist in New York and the group?s president.

A spokesman for CVS said it had created a system to address the
issue, but Dr. Schwartz said complaints persisted.

Regulating the chains ? five rank among the nation?s 100 largest
companies ? has proved difficult for state pharmacy boards, which
oversee the industry but sometimes allow company representatives
to hold seats. Florida?s nine-member board, for instance, includes
a lawyer for CVS and a director of pharmacy affairs at Walgreens.

Aside from creating potential conflicts of interest, the industry
presence can stifle complaints. ?We are afraid to speak up and lose
our jobs,? one pharmacist wrote anonymously last year in response
to a survey by the Missouri Board of Pharmacy. ?PLEASE HELP."

Officials from several state boards told The Times they had limited
authority to dictate how companies ran their businesses. Efforts
by legislatures in California and elsewhere have been unsuccessful
in substantially changing how pharmacies operate.

A majority of state boards do not require pharmacies to report
errors, let alone conduct thorough investigations when they occur.
Most investigations focus on pharmacists, not the conditions in
their workplaces.

In public meetings, boards in at least two states have instructed
pharmacists to quit or speak up if they believe conditions are
unsafe. But pharmacists said they feared retaliation, knowing they
could easily be replaced.

The industry has been squeezed amid declining drug reimbursement
rates and cost pressures from administrators of prescription drug
plans. Consolidation, meanwhile, has left only a few major players.
About 70 percent of prescriptions nationwide are dispensed by chain
drugstores, supermarkets or retailers like Walmart, according to
a 2019 Drug Channels Institute report.

CVS garners a quarter of the country?s total prescription revenue
and dispenses more than a billion prescriptions a year. Walgreens
captures almost 20 percent. Walmart, Kroger and Rite Aid fall next
in line among brick-and-mortar stores.

In statements, the pharmacy chains said patient safety was of utmost
concern, with staffing carefully set to ensure accurate dispensing.
Investment in technology such as e-prescribing has increased safety
and efficiency, the companies said. They denied that pharmacists
were under extreme pressure or faced reprisals.

?When a pharmacist has a legitimate concern about working conditions,
we make every effort to address that concern in good faith,? CVS
said in a statement. Walgreens cited its confidential employee
hotline and said it made ?clear to all pharmacists that they should
never work beyond what they believe is advisable.?

Errors, the companies said, were regrettable but rare; they declined
to provide data about mistakes.

The National Association of Chain Drug Stores, a trade group, said
that ?pharmacies consider even one prescription error to be one
too many? and ?seek continuous improvement.? The organization said
it was wrong to ?assume cause-effect relationships? between errors
and pharmacists? workload.

The specifics and severity of errors are nearly impossible to tally.
Aside from lax reporting requirements, many mistakes never become
public because companies settle with victims or their families,
often requiring a confidentiality agreement. A CVS form for staff
members to report errors asks whether the patient is a ?media
threat,? according to a photo provided to The Times. CVS said in
a statement it would not provide details on what it called its
?escalation process.?

The last comprehensive study of medication errors was over a decade
ago: The Institute of Medicine estimated in 2006 that such mistakes
harmed at least 1.5 million Americans each year.

Jonathan Lewis said he waited on hold with CVS for 40 minutes last
summer, after discovering his antidepressant prescription had been
refilled with another drug.

Mr. Lewis, 47, suspected something was wrong when he felt short of
breath and extremely dizzy. Looking closely at the medication ?
and turning to Google ? he figured out it was estrogen, not an
antidepressant, which patients should not abruptly quit.

?It was very apparent they were very understaffed,? Mr. Lewis said,
recalling long lines inside the Las Vegas store and at the
drive-through when he picked up the prescription. Pharmacists have
written to state regulatory boards about their safety concerns.

?My fellow pharmacists and pharmacy technicians are at our breaking
point. Chain pharmacy practices are preventing us from taking care
of our patients and putting them at risk of dangerous medication
errors.? New Jersey pharmacist

?The mistakes I have seen occur in this environment are both
frightening and understandable when we are under the gun to perform
the impossible. I?ve had a technician mix two strengths of a critical
blood pressure medication.? South Carolina pharmacist

?A fatigued and distracted pharmacist in a fast-paced, chaotic
environment is much more likely to make an error. The harm from a
medication error ranges from being a slight inconvenience to being
fatal.? Texas pharmacist

?Something needs to be done about this before lives are lost. Our
patients depend on us for their safety and wellness. We have to
live up to their expectations.? North Carolina pharmacist

?We are being asked to do things that we know at a gut level are
dangerous. If we won?t or can?t do them, our employers will find
someone else who will, and they will likely try to pay them less
for the same work.? South Carolina pharmacist

?We are forced to harass patients at check out to fill unnecessary
meds, request unnecessary refills, and to enroll in automatic fill
programs that result in dangerous duplications and meds to be filled
that were intended for single time use.? Missouri pharmacist Too
Much, Too Fast

The day before Wesley Hickman quit his job as a pharmacist at CVS,
he worked a 13-hour shift with no breaks for lunch or dinner, he
said.

As the only pharmacist on duty that day at the Leland, N.C., store,
Dr. Hickman filled 552 prescriptions ? about one every minute and
25 seconds ? while counseling patients, giving shots, making calls
and staffing the drive-through, he said. Partway through his shift
the next day, in December 2018, he called his manager.

?I said, ?I am not going to work in a situation that is unsafe.?
I shut the door and left,? said Dr. Hickman, who now runs an
independent pharmacy.

Dr. Hickman felt that the multitude of required tasks distracted
from his most important jobs: filling prescriptions accurately and
counseling patients. He had begged his district manager to schedule
more pharmacists, but the request was denied, he said.

CVS said it could not comment on the ?individual concerns? of a
former employee.

With nearly 10,000 pharmacies across the country, CVS is the largest
chain and among the most aggressive in imposing performance metrics,
pharmacists said. Both CVS and Walgreens tie bonuses to achieving
them, according to company documents.

Nearly everything is tracked and scrutinized: phone calls to
patients, the time it takes to fill a prescription, the number of
immunizations given, the number of customers signing up for 90-day
supplies of medication, to name a few.

The fact that tasks are being tracked is not the problem, pharmacists
say, as customers can benefit from services like reminders for flu
shots and refills. The issue is that employees are heavily evaluated
on hitting targets, they say, including in areas they cannot control.

In Missouri, dozens of pharmacists said in a recent survey by the
state board that the focus on metrics was a threat to patient safety
and their own job security.

?Metrics put unnecessary pressure on pharmacy staff to fill
prescriptions as fast as possible, resulting in errors,? one
pharmacist wrote.

Of the nearly 1,000 pharmacists who took the survey, 60 percent
said they ?agree? or ?strongly agree? that they ?feel pressured or
intimidated to meet standards or metrics that may interfere with
safe patient care.? About 60 percent of respondents worked for
retail chains, as opposed to hospitals or independent pharmacies.

Surveys in Maryland and Tennessee revealed similar concerns.

The specific goals are not made public, and can vary by store, but
internal CVS documents reviewed by The Times show what was expected
in some locations last year.

Staff members were supposed to persuade 65 percent of patients
picking up prescriptions to sign up for automatic refills, 55
percent to switch to 90-day supplies from 30-day, and 75 percent
to have the pharmacy contact their doctor with a ?proactive refill
request? if a prescription was expiring or had no refills, the
documents show.

Pharmacy staff members are also expected to call dozens of patients
each day, based on a computer-generated list. They are assessed on
the number of patients they reach, and the number who agree to
their requests.

Representatives from CVS and Walgreens said metrics were meant to
provide better patient care, not penalize pharmacists. Some are
related to reimbursements to pharmacies by insurance companies and
the government. CVS said it had halved its number of metrics over
the past 18 months.

But dozens of pharmacists described the emphasis on metrics as
burdensome, and said they faced backlash for failing to meet the
goals or suggesting they were unrealistic or unsafe.

?Any dissent perceived by corporate is met with a target placed on
one?s back,? an unnamed pharmacist wrote to the South Carolina
board last year.

In comments to state boards and interviews with The Times, pharmacists
explained how staffing cuts had led to longer shifts, often with
no break to use the restroom or eat.

?I certainly make more mistakes,? another South Carolina pharmacist
wrote to the board. ?I had two misfills in three years with the
previous staffing and now I make 10-12 per year (that are caught).?

Much of the blame for understaffing has been directed at pressure
from companies that manage drug plans for health insurers and
Medicare.

Acting as middlemen between drug manufacturers, insurers and
pharmacies, the companies ? known as pharmacy benefit managers, or
P.B.M.s ? negotiate prices and channel to pharmacies the more than
$300 billion spent on outpatient prescription drugs in the United
States annually.

The benefit managers charge fees to pharmacies, and have been widely
criticized for a lack of transparency and applying fees inconsistently.
In a letter to the Department of Health and Human Services in
September, a bipartisan group of senators noted an ?extraordinary
45,000 percent increase? in fees paid by pharmacies from 2010 to
2017.

While benefit managers have caused economic upheaval in the industry,
some pharmacy chains are players in that market too: CVS Health
owns CVS Caremark, the largest benefit manager; Walgreens Boots
Alliance has a partnership with Prime Therapeutics; Rite Aid owns
a P.B.M., too.

The Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, the trade group
representing benefit managers, contends that they make prescriptions
more affordable, and pushes back against the notion that P.B.M.s
are responsible for pressures on pharmacies, instead of a competitive
market. Pharmacists have written to state regulatory boards about
their safety concerns.

?I am expected to make 50-100 phone calls in addition to answering
phone calls, consultations, vaccinations and prescription verification.
This has resulted in dispensing errors. A member of our staff
misfilled a narcotic prescription for immediate release rather than
extended release which resulted luckily in only patient fatigue,
but it could have easily been deadly.? South Carolina pharmacist

?Thank the Lord I have not had any life-threatening misfills, but
I have had a number of ?minor? misfills mostly due to having to be
responsible for so many duties at once and constantly being pulled
away from verification to multitask.? South Carolina pharmacist

?I'm confident that I?ve had dispensing errors which have left my
pharmacy, but I was working too fast in order to meet our precious
metrics to notice them. Let's hope nobody suffered or died because
of it.? Missouri pharmacist

?I am currently a pharmacist working at CVS. I am writing to you
anonymously today as I fear for losing my job should my identity
be known; however, I feel it is my duty to bring our current
conditions to the board of pharmacy.? North Carolina pharmacist

?I've refrained from drinking fluids due to the fact that I couldn't
get to the restroom. I have ended up with kidney stones and infections
on more than one occasion.? South Carolina pharmacist

?There is so much pressure to work so quickly that there are nights
I go home just hoping I haven't made a mistake in all the craziness.
I work 8-10 hour shifts without a single break. Some days I go an
entire shift without finding any time to leave to use the restroom.?
Missouri pharmacist Falling Through the Cracks

Dr. Mark Lopatin, a rheumatologist in Pennsylvania, says he is
inundated with refill requests for almost every prescription he
writes. At times Dr. Lopatin prescribes drugs intended only for a
brief treatment ? a steroid to treat a flare-up of arthritis, for
instance.

But within days or weeks, he said, the pharmacy sends a refill
request even though the prescription did not call for one. Each
time, his office looks at the patient?s chart to confirm the request
is warranted. About half are not, he said.

Aside from creating unnecessary work, Dr. Lopatin believes, the
flood of requests poses a safety issue. ?When you are bombarded
with refill after refill, it?s easy for things to fall through the
cracks, despite your best efforts,? he said.

Pharmacists told The Times that many unwanted refill requests were
generated by automated systems designed in part to increase sales.
Others were the result of phone calls from pharmacists, who said
they faced pressure to reach quotas.

In February, a CVS pharmacist wrote to the South Carolina board
that cold calls to doctors should stop, explaining that a call was
considered ?successful? only if the doctor agreed to the refill.

?What this means is that we are overwhelming doctor?s office staff
with constant calls, and patients are often kept on medication that
is unneeded for extended periods of time,? the pharmacist wrote.

CVS says outreach to patients and doctors can help patients stay
up-to-date on their medications, and lead to lower costs and better
health.

Dr. Rachel Poliquin, a psychiatrist in North Carolina who says she
constantly gets refill requests, estimates that about 90 percent
of her patients say they never asked their pharmacy to contact her.

While Dr. Poliquin has a policy that patients must contact her
directly for more medication, she worries about clinics where
prescriptions may get rubber-stamped in a flurry of requests. Then
patients ? especially those who are elderly or mentally ill ? may
continue taking medication unnecessarily, she said.

The American Psychiatric Association has been trying to tackle a
related problem after hearing from members that CVS was giving
patients larger supplies of medication than doctors had directed.

While it is common for pharmacies to dispense 90 days? worth of
maintenance medications ? to treat chronic conditions like high
blood pressure or diabetes ? doctors say it is inappropriate for
other drugs.

For example, patients with bipolar disorder are often prescribed
lithium, a potentially lethal drug if taken in excess. It is common
for psychiatrists to start a patient on a low dose or to limit the
number of pills dispensed at once, especially if the person is
considered a suicide risk.

But increasingly, the psychiatric association has heard from members
that smaller quantities specified on prescriptions are being ignored,
particularly by CVS, according to Dr. Schwartz, the group?s president.

CVS has created a system where doctors can register and request
that 90-day supplies not be dispensed to their patients. But doctors
report that the registry has not solved the problem, Dr. Schwartz
said. In a statement, CVS said it continued to ?refine and enhance?
the program.

Dr. Charles Denby, a psychiatrist in Rhode Island, became so
concerned by the practice that he started stamping prescriptions,
?AT MONTHLY INTERVALS ONLY.? Despite those explicit instructions,
Dr. Denby said, he received faxes from CVS saying his patients had
asked for ? and been given ? 90-day supplies.

Dr. Denby, who retired in December, said it was a ?baldfaced lie?
that the patients had asked for the medication, providing statements
from patients saying as much.

?I am disgusted with this,? said Dr. Denby, who worries that patients
may attempt suicide with excess medication. ?There are going to be
people dead only because they have enough medication to do the deed
with.? ?We Already Have Systems in Place?

Alton James never learned how the mistake came about that he says
killed his 85-year-old mother, Mary Scheuerman, in 2018.

He knows he picked up her prescription at the pharmacy in a Publix
supermarket in Lakeland, Fla. He knows he gave her a pill each
morning. He knows that after six days, she turned pale, her blood
pressure dropped and she was rushed to the hospital. Image Mary
Scheuerman died in December 2018 after taking a powerful chemotherapy
drug mistakenly dispensed by a Publix pharmacy. Her son said she
was supposed to have received an antidepressant.

Mr. James remembers a doctor telling him his mother?s blood had a
toxic level of methotrexate, a drug often used to treat cancer.
But Mrs. Scheuerman didn?t have cancer. She was supposed to be
taking an antidepressant. Mr. James said a pharmacy employee later
confirmed that someone had mistakenly dispensed methotrexate.

Five days after entering the hospital, Mrs. Scheuerman died, with
organ failure listed as the lead cause, according to medical records
cited by Mr. James.

The Institute for Safe Medication Practices has warned about
methotrexate, listing it as a ?high-alert medication? that can be
deadly when taken incorrectly. Mr. James reported the pharmacy?s
error to the group, writing that he wanted to raise awareness about
the drug and push Publix, one of the country?s largest supermarket
chains, to ?clean up? its pharmacy division, according to a copy
of his report provided to The Times. Image Trexall, a brand name
for the drug methotrexate, can be used to treat cancer.

The company acknowledged the mistake and offered a settlement, Mr.
James wrote, but would not discuss how to avoid future errors,
saying, ?We already have systems in place.?

Last September, Mr. James told The Times that Publix wanted him to
sign a settlement agreement that would prevent him from speaking
further about his mother?s death. Mr. James has since declined to
comment, saying that the matter was ?amicably resolved.?

A spokeswoman for Publix said privacy laws prevented the company
from commenting on specific patients.

It can be difficult for patients and their families to decide
whether to accept a settlement.

Last summer, CVS offered to compensate Kelsey and Donavan Sullivan
after a pediatrician discovered the reflux medication they had been
giving their 4-month-old for two months was actually a steroid. To
be safely weaned, the baby had to keep taking it for two weeks
after the error was discovered.

?It was like he was coming out of a fog,? Mrs. Sullivan recalled.

The couple, from Minnesota, are still considering a settlement but
haven?t agreed to anything because they don?t know what long-term
consequences their son might face.

The kinds of errors and how they occur vary considerably.

The paper stapled to a CVS bag containing medication for Ms. Watrous,
the Connecticut teenager with asthma, listed her correct name and
medication, but the bottle inside had someone else?s name.

Directions on the prescription for Mr. Walker, the Illinois man
who got ear drops instead of eye drops from Walgreens, were clear:
?Instill 1 drop in both eyes every 6 hours.? He later saw the box:
?For use in ears only.?

In September, Stefanie Davis, 31, got the right medicine, Adderall,
but the wrong dose. She pulled over on the interstate after feeling
short of breath and dizzy with blurred vision. The pills, dispensed
by a Walgreens in Sun City Center, Fla., were each 30 milligrams
instead of her usual 20. She is fighting with Walgreens to cover
a $900 bill for her visit to an emergency room. Fixes That Fall
Short

State boards and legislatures have wrestled with how to regulate
the industry. Some states have adopted laws, for instance introducing
mandatory lunch breaks or limiting the number of technicians a
pharmacist can supervise.

But the laws aren?t always followed, can be difficult to enforce
or can fail to address broader problems.

The National Association of Chain Drug Stores says some state boards
are blocking meaningful change. The group, for instance, wants to
free up pharmacists from some tasks by allowing technicians, who
have less training, to do more.

It also supports efforts to change the insurance reimbursement
model for pharmacies. Health care services provided by pharmacists
to patients, such as prescribing birth control, are not consistently
covered by insurers or allowed in all states. But it has been
difficult to find consensus to change federal and state regulations.

While those debates continue, some state boards are trying to hold
companies more accountable.

Often when an error is reported to a board, action is taken against
the pharmacist, an obvious target. It is less common for a company
to be scrutinized.

The South Carolina board discussed in November how to more thoroughly
investigate conditions after a mistake. It also published a statement
discouraging quotas and encouraging ?employers to value patient
safety over operational efficiency and financial targets.?

California passed a law saying no pharmacist could be required to
work alone, but it has been largely ignored since taking effect
last year, according to leaders of a pharmacists? union. The state
board is trying to clarify the law?s requirements.

In Illinois, a new law requires breaks for pharmacists and potential
penalties for companies that do not provide a safe working environment.
The law was in response to a 2016 Chicago Tribune investigation
revealing that pharmacies failed to warn patients about dangerous
drug combinations.

Some states are trying to make changes behind closed doors. After
seeing results of its survey last year, the Missouri board invited
companies to private meetings early this year to answer questions
about errors, staffing and patient safety.

CVS and Walgreens said they would attend.

Research was contributed by Susan C. Beachy, Jack Begg, Alain
Delaquérière and Sheelagh McNeill.


--===============0593070582==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Hangout mailing list
Hangout-at-nylxs.com
http://lists.mrbrklyn.com/mailman/listinfo/hangout

--===============0593070582==--

  1. 2020-02-01 Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh-at-sourceware.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] The GNU C Library version 2.31 is now available
  2. 2020-02-01 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  3. 2020-02-01 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Talented Programmers...
  4. 2020-02-01 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Pharm Economcis and Chains killing pts (NY Times)
  5. 2020-02-01 Richard Stallman <rms-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  6. 2020-02-01 Ruben Safir <ruben.safir-at-my.liu.edu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  7. 2020-02-03 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] I suspect that there is no such thing as a
  8. 2020-02-03 Shorefront News <donotreply-at-wordpress.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] =?utf-8?q?=5BNew_post=5D_Office_of_Brighton=2C_?=
  9. 2020-02-03 Gabor Szabo <gabor-at-szabgab.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] [Perlweekly] #445 - More challenges
  10. 2020-02-03 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Request to mailing list gnu-misc-discuss
  11. 2020-02-03 From: "Speaker Corey Johnson" <SpeakerJohnson-at-council.nyc.gov> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Our Homelessness Crisis: The Case for Change
  12. 2020-02-04 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: [dinosaur] NHMU DinoFest videos + Garjainia
  13. 2020-02-05 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Museum Exhibits
  14. 2020-02-05 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Facial Reconition Software
  15. 2020-02-06 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: What's GNU -- and what's not
  16. 2020-02-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] intel linux on laptops beats w10 et al
  17. 2020-02-10 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] code of conduct, or code of rights?
  18. 2020-02-10 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  19. 2020-02-10 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What exactly are we discussing?
  20. 2020-02-06 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  21. 2020-02-07 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  22. 2020-02-06 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  23. 2020-02-09 Richard Stallman <rms-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  24. 2020-02-09 Carlo Wood <carlo-at-alinoe.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  25. 2020-02-09 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  26. 2020-02-06 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  27. 2020-02-09 John Darrington <jmd-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  28. 2020-02-09 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  29. 2020-02-09 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  30. 2020-02-08 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  31. 2020-02-08 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  32. 2020-02-09 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  33. 2020-02-08 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  34. 2020-02-08 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  35. 2020-02-08 John Darrington <jmd-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  36. 2020-02-08 From: "Federico Leva (Nemo)" <nemowiki-at-gmail.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  37. 2020-02-08 DJ Delorie <dj-at-delorie.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  38. 2020-02-08 Carlo Wood <carlo-at-alinoe.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  39. 2020-02-06 fredomatic-at-free.fr Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  40. 2020-02-08 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  41. 2020-02-08 From: "Andreas R." <avr-at-softwarelibre.nl> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  42. 2020-02-08 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  43. 2020-02-07 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  44. 2020-02-07 Tobias Platen <tplaten-at-posteo.de> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] My relationship to GNU and the FSF
  45. 2020-02-07 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  46. 2020-02-07 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  47. 2020-02-07 Carlo Wood <carlo-at-alinoe.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  48. 2020-02-07 Carlo Wood <carlo-at-alinoe.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  49. 2020-02-05 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  50. 2020-02-05 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  51. 2020-02-06 Andrej Shadura <andrewsh-at-debian.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  52. 2020-02-06 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  53. 2020-02-05 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  54. 2020-02-08 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  55. 2020-02-08 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  56. 2020-02-08 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Request to mailing list gnu-misc-discuss
  57. 2020-02-08 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Request to mailing list gnu-misc-discuss
  58. 2020-02-08 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  59. 2020-02-08 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  60. 2020-02-08 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  61. 2020-02-02 From: "J.B. Nicholson" <jbn-at-forestfield.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] I suspect that there is no such thing as a "GNU
  62. 2020-02-03 Benno Schulenberg <bensberg-at-telfort.nl> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  63. 2020-02-10 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  64. 2020-02-10 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  65. 2020-02-10 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  66. 2020-02-08 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Request to mailing list gnu-misc-discuss
  67. 2020-02-10 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  68. 2020-02-02 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  69. 2020-02-10 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  70. 2020-02-10 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  71. 2020-02-10 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  72. 2020-02-10 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  73. 2020-02-10 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] [Perlweekly] #446 - Perl Web Presence
  74. 2020-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] You might find this to be of interest
  75. 2020-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Vicious Attacks on us ALL
  76. 2020-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new
  77. 2020-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  78. 2020-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: State of the GNUnion 2020
  79. 2020-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  80. 2020-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  81. 2020-02-11 gnu-misc-discuss-owner-at-gnu.org Re: [Hangout - NYLXS]
  82. 2020-02-11 From: "American Museum of Natural History" <GilderCenter-at-amnh.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Gilder Center Project Update
  83. 2020-02-11 PSSNY <staff-at-pssny.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Advocate with PSSNY for the Future of Community
  84. 2020-02-10 Shorefront News <donotreply-at-wordpress.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] [New post] Congressional Candidate Joe Caldarera
  85. 2020-02-10 From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos-at-systemhalted.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] I suspect that there is no such thing as a
  86. 2020-02-10 Carlo Wood <carlo-at-alinoe.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] what is GNU? what is a social contract?
  87. 2020-02-06 Andrej Shadura <andrewsh-at-debian.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  88. 2020-02-06 Andrej Shadura <andrewsh-at-debian.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  89. 2020-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] I suspect that there is no such thing as a
  90. 2020-02-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  91. 2020-02-12 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: about the GNU promise
  92. 2020-02-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  93. 2020-02-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  94. 2020-02-12 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: about the GNU promise
  95. 2020-02-12 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  96. 2020-02-12 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  97. 2020-02-12 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  98. 2020-02-12 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  99. 2020-02-12 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  100. 2020-02-12 Matthew Persico <matthew.persico-at-gmail.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] CFP NY.PM Technical Meetup
  101. 2020-02-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  102. 2020-02-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  103. 2020-02-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  104. 2020-02-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  105. 2020-02-13 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  106. 2020-02-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  107. 2020-02-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  108. 2020-02-13 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  109. 2020-02-13 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  110. 2020-02-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  111. 2020-02-13 nipponmail-at-firemail.cc Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  112. 2020-02-12 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GSC 1.0 endorsement
  113. 2020-02-12 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  114. 2020-02-13 From: "Andreas R." <avr-at-softwarelibre.nl> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  115. 2020-02-12 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  116. 2020-02-12 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] I suspect that there is no such thing as a
  117. 2020-02-12 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  118. 2020-02-12 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  119. 2020-02-12 DJ Delorie <dj-at-delorie.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  120. 2020-02-11 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  121. 2020-02-12 Eli Zaretskii <eliz-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  122. 2020-02-12 Mike Gerwitz <mtg-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  123. 2020-02-11 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  124. 2020-02-11 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  125. 2020-02-11 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  126. 2020-02-11 From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos-at-systemhalted.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] what is GNU? what is a social contract?
  127. 2020-02-10 John Darrington <jmd-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  128. 2020-02-10 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GSC 1.0 endorsement
  129. 2020-02-11 From: "Andreas R." <avr-at-softwarelibre.nl> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  130. 2020-02-11 DJ Delorie <dj-at-delorie.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  131. 2020-02-11 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] I suspect that there is no such thing as a
  132. 2020-02-10 Andy Wingo <wingo-at-pobox.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  133. 2020-02-11 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  134. 2020-02-11 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  135. 2020-02-10 From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos-at-systemhalted.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] I suspect that there is no such thing as a
  136. 2020-02-10 nylxs <mrbrklyn-at-optonline.net> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  137. 2020-02-10 fredomatic-at-free.fr Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social Contract
  138. 2020-02-10 From: "Andreas R." <avr-at-softwarelibre.nl> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the FSF and GNU
  139. 2020-02-10 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  140. 2020-02-10 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  141. 2020-02-10 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  142. 2020-02-10 Werner Koch <wk-at-gnupg.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  143. 2020-02-10 Carlo Wood <carlo-at-alinoe.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] what is GNU? what is a social contract?
  144. 2020-02-09 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  145. 2020-02-09 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  146. 2020-02-09 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  147. 2020-02-13 nipponmail-at-firemail.cc Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  148. 2020-02-12 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GSC 1.0 endorsement
  149. 2020-02-12 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  150. 2020-02-13 From: "Andreas R." <avr-at-softwarelibre.nl> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  151. 2020-02-12 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  152. 2020-02-12 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  153. 2020-02-12 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] I suspect that there is no such thing as a
  154. 2020-02-12 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  155. 2020-02-12 DJ Delorie <dj-at-delorie.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  156. 2020-02-11 From: "Andreas R." <avr-at-softwarelibre.nl> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  157. 2020-02-11 From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos-at-systemhalted.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] what is GNU? what is a social contract?
  158. 2020-02-11 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  159. 2020-02-11 Marius Bakke <mbakke-at-fastmail.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  160. 2020-02-11 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  161. 2020-02-10 From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos-at-systemhalted.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] I suspect that there is no such thing as a
  162. 2020-02-10 nylxs <mrbrklyn-at-optonline.net> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  163. 2020-02-10 Carlo Wood <carlo-at-alinoe.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] what is GNU? what is a social contract?
  164. 2020-02-10 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GSC 1.0 endorsement
  165. 2020-02-11 DJ Delorie <dj-at-delorie.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  166. 2020-02-11 Marius Bakke <mbakke-at-fastmail.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  167. 2020-02-10 Daniel Pocock <daniel-at-pocock.pro> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] what is GNU? what is a social contract?
  168. 2020-02-10 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the FSF and GNU
  169. 2020-02-10 Werner Koch <wk-at-gnupg.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] GSC 1.0 endorsement
  170. 2020-02-10 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  171. 2020-02-09 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  172. 2020-02-09 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  173. 2020-02-09 Andy Wingo <wingo-at-pobox.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the FSF and GNU
  174. 2020-02-09 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Proposals for the new GNU/FSF relationship
  175. 2020-02-09 Carlo Wood <carlo-at-alinoe.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  176. 2020-02-09 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  177. 2020-02-09 John Darrington <jmd-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  178. 2020-02-09 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  179. 2020-02-09 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  180. 2020-02-11 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  181. 2020-02-12 Eli Zaretskii <eliz-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  182. 2020-02-12 Mike Gerwitz <mtg-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  183. 2020-02-11 DJ Delorie <dj-at-delorie.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  184. 2020-02-11 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] I suspect that there is no such thing as a
  185. 2020-02-11 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  186. 2020-02-11 DJ Delorie <dj-at-delorie.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  187. 2020-02-11 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  188. 2020-02-11 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  189. 2020-02-10 John Darrington <jmd-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  190. 2020-02-10 Andy Wingo <wingo-at-pobox.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  191. 2020-02-10 From: "Andreas R." <avr-at-softwarelibre.nl> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the FSF and GNU
  192. 2020-02-10 fredomatic-at-free.fr Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social Contract
  193. 2020-02-10 Daniel Pocock <daniel-at-pocock.pro> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] what is GNU? what is a social contract?
  194. 2020-02-10 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the FSF and GNU
  195. 2020-02-10 Werner Koch <wk-at-gnupg.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] GSC 1.0 endorsement
  196. 2020-02-10 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  197. 2020-02-10 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  198. 2020-02-09 Carlo Wood <carlo-at-alinoe.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  199. 2020-02-09 John Darrington <jmd-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  200. 2020-02-08 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  201. 2020-02-07 Carlo Wood <carlo-at-alinoe.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  202. 2020-02-07 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  203. 2020-02-07 Tobias Platen <tplaten-at-posteo.de> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] My relationship to GNU and the FSF
  204. 2020-02-07 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  205. 2020-02-07 Carlo Wood <carlo-at-alinoe.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  206. 2020-02-07 Carlo Wood <carlo-at-alinoe.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What exactly are we discussing?
  207. 2020-02-07 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  208. 2020-02-07 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What exactly are we discussing?
  209. 2020-02-05 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  210. 2020-02-05 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] code of conduct, or code of rights?
  211. 2020-02-05 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  212. 2020-02-05 Daniel Pocock <daniel-at-pocock.pro> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] code of conduct, or code of rights?
  213. 2020-02-02 Marcel <mve1-at-runbox.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  214. 2020-02-05 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  215. 2020-02-05 Carlo Wood <carlo-at-gnu.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] What exactly are we discussing?
  216. 2020-02-03 Benno Schulenberg <bensberg-at-telfort.nl> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  217. 2020-02-02 From: "J.B. Nicholson" <jbn-at-forestfield.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] I suspect that there is no such thing as a "GNU
  218. 2020-02-10 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  219. 2020-02-10 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  220. 2020-02-10 Werner Koch <wk-at-gnupg.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  221. 2020-02-09 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  222. 2020-02-09 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  223. 2020-02-09 Andy Wingo <wingo-at-pobox.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the FSF and GNU
  224. 2020-02-08 From: "Federico Leva (Nemo)" <nemowiki-at-gmail.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  225. 2020-02-08 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  226. 2020-02-08 DJ Delorie <dj-at-delorie.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  227. 2020-02-08 Carlo Wood <carlo-at-alinoe.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  228. 2020-02-08 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  229. 2020-02-08 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  230. 2020-02-08 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  231. 2020-02-08 From: "Andreas R." <avr-at-softwarelibre.nl> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  232. 2020-02-08 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  233. 2020-02-08 From: "Kim Lee" <kimseihlee-at-gmx.net> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  234. 2020-02-07 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What exactly are we discussing?
  235. 2020-02-06 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  236. 2020-02-06 Andrej Shadura <andrewsh-at-debian.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  237. 2020-02-06 Andrej Shadura <andrewsh-at-debian.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  238. 2020-02-09 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Proposals for the new GNU/FSF relationship
  239. 2020-02-01 facebook <facebook-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  240. 2020-02-01 fredomatic <fredomatic-at-free.fr> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social Contract
  241. 2020-02-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  242. 2020-02-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GSC 1.0 endorsement
  243. 2020-02-09 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  244. 2020-02-09 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  245. 2020-02-09 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  246. 2020-02-09 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  247. 2020-02-06 fredomatic-at-free.fr Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  248. 2020-02-08 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  249. 2020-02-08 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  250. 2020-02-08 John Darrington <jmd-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  251. 2020-02-06 Andrej Shadura <andrewsh-at-debian.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  252. 2020-02-06 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  253. 2020-02-06 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  254. 2020-02-06 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  255. 2020-02-06 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: What's GNU -- and what's not]
  256. 2020-02-05 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What exactly are we discussing?
  257. 2020-02-02 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  258. 2020-02-02 John Darrington <jmd-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  259. 2020-02-02 John Darrington <jmd-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new
  260. 2020-02-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  261. 2020-02-02 Ales Cepek <cepek-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  262. 2020-02-02 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  263. 2020-02-13 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] hat is GNU? what is a social contract?
  264. 2020-02-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] security alert... worth noting
  265. 2020-02-13 IEEE Spectrum <ieee-spectrum-at-deliver.ieee.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Tech Alert
  266. 2020-02-13 IEEE Spectrum <ieee-spectrum-at-deliver.ieee.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Tech Alert
  267. 2020-02-11 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  268. 2020-02-12 Mike Gerwitz <mtg-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  269. 2020-02-12 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  270. 2020-02-12 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Moderation
  271. 2020-02-12 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  272. 2020-02-12 Eli Zaretskii <eliz-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  273. 2020-02-12 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  274. 2020-02-12 DJ Delorie <dj-at-delorie.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  275. 2020-02-12 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GSC 1.0 endorsement
  276. 2020-02-12 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] I suspect that there is no such thing as a
  277. 2020-02-12 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] I suspect that there is no such thing as a
  278. 2020-02-12 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  279. 2020-02-12 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  280. 2020-02-13 nipponmail-at-firemail.cc Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  281. 2020-02-13 Mark Galassi <mark-at-galassi.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] gnu social construct 1.0 endorsement
  282. 2020-02-13 Daniel Pocock <daniel-at-pocock.pro> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  283. 2020-02-13 From: "Andreas R." <avr-at-softwarelibre.nl> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  284. 2020-02-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Moderation
  285. 2020-02-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  286. 2020-02-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] gnu social construct 1.0 endorsement
  287. 2020-02-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] gnu social construct 1.0 endorsement
  288. 2020-02-14 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  289. 2020-02-14 John Darrington <jmd-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  290. 2020-02-14 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Moderation
  291. 2020-02-14 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  292. 2020-02-14 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  293. 2020-02-14 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  294. 2020-02-14 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Cause for bans
  295. 2020-02-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  296. 2020-02-14 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What exactly are we discussing?
  297. 2020-02-14 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  298. 2020-02-14 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  299. 2020-02-14 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  300. 2020-02-14 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  301. 2020-02-15 Andreas Enge <andreas-at-enge.fr> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  302. 2020-02-15 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  303. 2020-02-15 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU Social Contract
  304. 2020-02-15 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  305. 2020-02-14 nipponmail-at-firemail.cc Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  306. 2020-02-15 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU Social Contract
  307. 2020-02-15 John Darrington <jmd-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] gnu social construct 1.0 endorsement
  308. 2020-02-14 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  309. 2020-02-14 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] security alert... worth noting
  310. 2020-02-14 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  311. 2020-02-14 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  312. 2020-02-14 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Moderation
  313. 2020-02-14 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  314. 2020-02-14 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's GNU -- and what's not
  315. 2020-02-14 Phil Maker <philip.maker-at-gmail.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract 1.0 - doubts
  316. 2020-02-14 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU Social Contract
  317. 2020-02-15 Nick Moffitt <nick-at-zork.net> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [conspire] Ruby, Python, Swift, and Languages
  318. 2020-02-15 Nick Moffitt <nick-at-zork.net> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [conspire] 21st century web platforms
  319. 2020-02-15 Andreas Enge <andreas-at-enge.fr> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  320. 2020-02-15 Daniel Pocock <daniel-at-pocock.pro> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  321. 2020-02-15 Andreas Enge <andreas-at-enge.fr> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract 1.0 - doubts
  322. 2020-02-15 Daniel Pocock <daniel-at-pocock.pro> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] avoiding the bias in vocabulary
  323. 2020-02-15 Andreas Enge <andreas-at-enge.fr> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  324. 2020-02-15 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] gnu social construct 1.0 endorsement
  325. 2020-02-15 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov-at-yandex.ru> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  326. 2020-02-15 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov-at-yandex.ru> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  327. 2020-02-15 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov-at-yandex.ru> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  328. 2020-02-15 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] gnu social construct 1.0 endorsement
  329. 2020-02-15 Andreas Enge <andreas-at-enge.fr> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  330. 2020-02-15 Andreas Enge <andreas-at-enge.fr> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  331. 2020-02-15 Daniel Pocock <daniel-at-pocock.pro> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  332. 2020-02-15 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov-at-yandex.ru> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  333. 2020-02-15 Andreas Enge <andreas-at-enge.fr> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract 1.0 - doubts
  334. 2020-02-15 Andreas Enge <andreas-at-enge.fr> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  335. 2020-02-15 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  336. 2020-02-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  337. 2020-02-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  338. 2020-02-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Moderation
  339. 2020-02-15 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract 1.0 - doubts
  340. 2020-02-15 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  341. 2020-02-15 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] about the GNU promise
  342. 2020-02-15 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU Social Contract
  343. 2020-02-15 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  344. 2020-02-15 gnu-misc-discuss-owner-at-gnu.org Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] =?utf-8?q?Endorsing_the_GNU_Social_Contract?=
  345. 2020-02-15 Alexander Vdolainen <alex-at-vapaa.xyz> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  346. 2020-02-15 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract 1.0 - doubts
  347. 2020-02-16 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] GAIA - discover really BIG data with Free Software
  348. 2020-02-16 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  349. 2020-02-16 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  350. 2020-02-16 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  351. 2020-02-16 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  352. 2020-02-16 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  353. 2020-02-16 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  354. 2020-02-16 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  355. 2020-02-16 Ruben Safir <ruben.safir-at-my.liu.edu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  356. 2020-02-16 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  357. 2020-02-16 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  358. 2020-02-16 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  359. 2020-02-16 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  360. 2020-02-16 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  361. 2020-02-16 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  362. 2020-02-16 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  363. 2020-02-16 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  364. 2020-02-16 Daniel Pocock <daniel-at-pocock.pro> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  365. 2020-02-16 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] gnu social construct 1.0 endorsement
  366. 2020-02-16 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  367. 2020-02-16 Daniel Pocock <daniel-at-pocock.pro> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  368. 2020-02-16 From: "Kim Lee" <kimseihlee-at-gmx.net> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Moderation
  369. 2020-02-16 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  370. 2020-02-15 Phil Maker <philip.maker-at-gmail.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract 1.0 - doubts
  371. 2020-02-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  372. 2020-02-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  373. 2020-02-15 From: "Pat Schloss" <pdschloss-at-gmail.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] [mothur] Announcing an *online* mothur workshop
  374. 2020-02-16 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Moderation
  375. 2020-02-16 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  376. 2020-02-16 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  377. 2020-02-16 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  378. 2020-02-16 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  379. 2020-02-16 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov-at-yandex.ru> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  380. 2020-02-16 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  381. 2020-02-16 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  382. 2020-02-16 Daniel Pocock <daniel-at-pocock.pro> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  383. 2020-02-16 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  384. 2020-02-16 John Darrington <jmd-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  385. 2020-02-16 Daniel Pocock <daniel-at-pocock.pro> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  386. 2020-02-16 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  387. 2020-02-16 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  388. 2020-02-16 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  389. 2020-02-16 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  390. 2020-02-16 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Richard Stallman should be reinstated to
  391. 2020-02-16 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  392. 2020-02-16 John Darrington <jmd-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] duplicated messages and NYLXS cross-posting
  393. 2020-02-16 gnu-misc-discuss-owner-at-gnu.org Re: [Hangout - NYLXS]
  394. 2020-02-16 Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU Social Contract
  395. 2020-02-16 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU Social Contract
  396. 2020-02-16 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Richard Stallman should be reinstated to
  397. 2020-02-15 Thomas Dickey <dickey-at-his.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] ncurses 6.2
  398. 2020-02-16 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU Social Contract
  399. 2020-02-16 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  400. 2020-02-16 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract 1.0 - doubts
  401. 2020-02-16 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU Social Contract
  402. 2020-02-16 Christophe Poncy <christophe-at-poncy.fr> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  403. 2020-02-16 Christophe Poncy <christophe-at-poncy.fr> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Richard Stallman should be reinstated to
  404. 2020-02-16 Christophe Poncy <christophe-at-poncy.fr> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Richard Stallman should be reinstated to
  405. 2020-02-16 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU Social Contract
  406. 2020-02-17 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the GNU Social Contract
  407. 2020-02-17 ruben <ruben-at-bios-living.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] MMR Dosage Report - Last Seven Days
  408. 2020-02-17 ruben <ruben-at-bios-living.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] PPD Dosage Report - Last Seven Days
  409. 2020-02-17 ruben <ruben-at-bios-living.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] comminity 7 day billing report
  410. 2020-02-17 ruben <ruben-at-bios-living.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Community WEEKLY CHARGE
  411. 2020-02-17 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the GNU Social Contract
  412. 2020-02-17 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the GNU Social Contract
  413. 2020-02-17 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the GNU Social Contract
  414. 2020-02-16 From: "J.B. Nicholson" <jbn-at-forestfield.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Richard Stallman should be reinstated to
  415. 2020-02-17 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov-at-yandex.ru> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU Social Contract
  416. 2020-02-17 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  417. 2020-02-17 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU Social Contract
  418. 2020-02-17 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU Social Contract
  419. 2020-02-17 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  420. 2020-02-17 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing GNU Social Contract v1.0
  421. 2020-02-17 Nathan Sidwell <nathan-at-acm.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU Social Contract
  422. 2020-02-17 Marcel <mve1-at-runbox.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Richard Stallman should be reinstated to
  423. 2020-02-17 Andy Wingo <wingo-at-pobox.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing GNU Social Contract v1.0
  424. 2020-02-17 Nathan Sidwell <nathan-at-acm.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Moderation
  425. 2020-02-17 Daniel Pocock <daniel-at-pocock.pro> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] avoiding the bias in vocabulary
  426. 2020-02-17 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  427. 2020-02-17 nipponmail-at-firemail.cc Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Richard Stallman should be reinstated to
  428. 2020-02-17 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov-at-yandex.ru> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  429. 2020-02-17 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  430. 2020-02-17 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU Social Contract
  431. 2020-02-17 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing GNU Social Contract v1.0
  432. 2020-02-17 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU Social Contract
  433. 2020-02-17 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing GNU Social Contract v1.0
  434. 2020-02-17 Gabor Szabo <gabor-at-szabgab.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] [Perlweekly] #447 - AgoraCart,
  435. 2020-02-17 Nick Moffitt <nick-at-zork.net> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [conspire] 21st century web platforms
  436. 2020-02-17 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] avoiding the bias in vocabulary
  437. 2020-02-17 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  438. 2020-02-17 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing GNU Social Contract v1.0
  439. 2020-02-17 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing GNU Social Contract v1.0
  440. 2020-02-17 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Moderation
  441. 2020-02-17 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU Social Contract
  442. 2020-02-17 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Richard Stallman should be reinstated to
  443. 2020-02-17 Gabor Szabo <gabor-at-szabgab.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] [Perlweekly] #447 - AgoraCart,
  444. 2020-02-18 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  445. 2020-02-18 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  446. 2020-02-18 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  447. 2020-02-18 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  448. 2020-02-18 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  449. 2020-02-18 Eli Zaretskii <eliz-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  450. 2020-02-18 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  451. 2020-02-18 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  452. 2020-02-18 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  453. 2020-02-18 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  454. 2020-02-18 From: "Deutsch, Chaim" <CDeutsch-at-council.nyc.gov> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] THE DEUTSCH REPORT: Ticket Glitch Resolution!
  455. 2020-02-18 Eli Zaretskii <eliz-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  456. 2020-02-18 Andreas Enge <andreas-at-enge.fr> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  457. 2020-02-18 Richard Stallman <rms-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing GNU Social Contract v1.0
  458. 2020-02-18 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing GNU Social Contract v1.0
  459. 2020-02-16 From: "Canarsie Courier" <updates-at-canarsiecourier.net> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's Happening In Your Neighborhood?
  460. 2020-02-19 James E Keenan <jkeenan-at-pobox.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Operating Systems as Dumb Pipes (cross-listed
  461. 2020-02-19 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Richard Stallman should be reinstated to
  462. 2020-02-19 From: "American Museum of Natural History" <learn-at-amnh.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Celebrate Seminars on Science's 20th Anniversary
  463. 2020-02-19 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the GNU Social Contract
  464. 2020-02-18 From: "DCAS, Office of Citywide Recruitment, Office of Citywide Equity and Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] February 2020 Newsletter
  465. 2020-02-19 From: "American Museum of Natural History" <learn-at-amnh.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Celebrate Seminars on Science's 20th Anniversary
  466. 2020-02-19 James E Keenan <jkeenan-at-pobox.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Operating Systems as Dumb Pipes (cross-listed
  467. 2020-02-18 Carlo Wood <carlo-at-alinoe.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Proposals for the new GNU/FSF relationship
  468. 2020-02-18 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  469. 2020-02-18 Carlo Wood <carlo-at-alinoe.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Proposals for the new GNU/FSF relationship
  470. 2020-02-18 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  471. 2020-02-19 James E Keenan <jkeenan-at-pobox.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Operating Systems as Dumb Pipes (cross-listed
  472. 2020-02-18 Christophe Poncy <christophe-at-poncy.fr> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  473. 2020-02-19 Shorefront News <donotreply-at-wordpress.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] [New post] Brooklyn GOP Endorses Tannousis To
  474. 2020-02-18 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  475. 2020-02-20 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  476. 2020-02-20 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the Social Contract 1.0
  477. 2020-02-20 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the Social Contract 1.0
  478. 2020-02-20 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the Social Contract 1.0
  479. 2020-02-20 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the Social Contract 1.0
  480. 2020-02-20 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov-at-yandex.ru> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  481. 2020-02-20 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  482. 2020-02-20 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov-at-yandex.ru> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  483. 2020-02-20 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov-at-yandex.ru> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  484. 2020-02-19 DJ Delorie <dj-at-delorie.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  485. 2020-02-19 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  486. 2020-02-19 DJ Delorie <dj-at-delorie.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  487. 2020-02-19 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  488. 2020-02-19 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  489. 2020-02-19 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  490. 2020-02-19 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] avoiding the bias in vocabulary
  491. 2020-02-19 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  492. 2020-02-19 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  493. 2020-02-19 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [conspire] 21st century web platforms
  494. 2020-02-20 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  495. 2020-02-20 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  496. 2020-02-20 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  497. 2020-02-20 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the Social Contract 1.0
  498. 2020-02-20 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the Social Contract 1.0
  499. 2020-02-20 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov-at-yandex.ru> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  500. 2020-02-20 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov-at-yandex.ru> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  501. 2020-02-20 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  502. 2020-02-20 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  503. 2020-02-20 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  504. 2020-02-20 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Social Contract version 1.0
  505. 2020-02-20 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  506. 2020-02-20 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov-at-yandex.ru> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  507. 2020-02-20 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the Social Contract 1.0
  508. 2020-02-20 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the Social Contract 1.0
  509. 2020-02-20 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the Social Contract 1.0
  510. 2020-02-20 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the Social Contract 1.0
  511. 2020-02-20 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the Social Contract 1.0
  512. 2020-02-20 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the Social Contract 1.0
  513. 2020-02-20 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  514. 2020-02-20 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  515. 2020-02-20 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  516. 2020-02-20 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  517. 2020-02-20 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  518. 2020-02-20 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  519. 2020-02-20 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the Social Contract 1.0
  520. 2020-02-20 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the Social Contract 1.0
  521. 2020-02-20 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the Social Contract 1.0
  522. 2020-02-20 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the Social Contract 1.0
  523. 2020-02-20 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the Social Contract 1.0
  524. 2020-02-20 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the Social Contract 1.0
  525. 2020-02-20 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  526. 2020-02-20 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  527. 2020-02-20 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  528. 2020-02-20 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  529. 2020-02-20 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  530. 2020-02-20 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the Social Contract 1.0
  531. 2020-02-20 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the Social Contract 1.0
  532. 2020-02-17 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU Social Contract
  533. 2020-02-17 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU Social Contract
  534. 2020-02-17 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing version 1.0 of the GNU Social
  535. 2020-02-20 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] mark is ided as spam
  536. 2020-02-20 From: "Andreas R." <avr-at-softwarelibre.nl> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  537. 2020-02-20 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  538. 2020-02-21 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU Social Contract
  539. 2020-02-21 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  540. 2020-02-21 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: February 2020 Newsletter
  541. 2020-02-20 Daniel Pocock <daniel-at-pocock.pro> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] avoiding the bias in vocabulary
  542. 2020-02-21 Daniel Pocock <daniel-at-pocock.pro> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] torture in online communities, FSF, Debian, etc
  543. 2020-02-21 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  544. 2020-02-20 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  545. 2020-02-20 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  546. 2020-02-21 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  547. 2020-02-20 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] [ruben-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com: [mark-at-klomp.org: Re:
  548. 2020-02-20 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  549. 2020-02-20 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  550. 2020-02-21 From: "Long Island University" <UniversityInfo-at-liu.edu> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] What's New At LIU
  551. 2020-02-21 From: =?UTF-8?B?5aSx5pWj57OW?= <sugar013-at-yeah.net> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] [png-mng-implement] Report bugs of libpng-1.6.37,
  552. 2020-02-21 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov-at-yandex.ru> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  553. 2020-02-21 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  554. 2020-02-20 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  555. 2020-02-20 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsement of the Social Contract 1.0
  556. 2020-02-20 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  557. 2020-02-21 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  558. 2020-02-21 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU Social Contract
  559. 2020-02-21 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] [Perlweekly] #447 - AgoraCart,
  560. 2020-02-21 Andreas Enge <andreas-at-enge.fr> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  561. 2020-02-21 John Darrington <jmd-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  562. 2020-02-21 Andreas Enge <andreas-at-enge.fr> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  563. 2020-02-21 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  564. 2020-02-22 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Richard Stallman should be reinstated to
  565. 2020-02-22 nipponmail-at-firemail.cc Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Richard Stallman should be reinstated to
  566. 2020-02-22 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Richard Stallman should be reinstated to
  567. 2020-02-22 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Richard Stallman should be reinstated to
  568. 2020-02-22 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: New text
  569. 2020-02-22 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  570. 2020-02-22 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  571. 2020-02-22 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  572. 2020-02-23 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  573. 2020-02-23 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  574. 2020-02-21 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  575. 2020-02-23 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  576. 2020-02-23 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU social contract
  577. 2020-02-23 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU social contract
  578. 2020-02-23 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  579. 2020-02-23 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  580. 2020-02-23 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  581. 2020-02-21 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  582. 2020-02-21 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  583. 2020-02-23 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU social contract
  584. 2020-02-23 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  585. 2020-02-23 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] lese majeste
  586. 2020-02-23 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  587. 2020-02-23 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  588. 2020-02-23 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  589. 2020-02-23 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  590. 2020-02-23 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU social contract
  591. 2020-02-23 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me-at-tobias.gr> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing a GNU social contract
  592. 2020-02-23 Taylan Kammer <taylan.kammer-at-gmail.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  593. 2020-02-23 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing a GNU social contract
  594. 2020-02-23 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  595. 2020-02-23 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  596. 2020-02-23 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  597. 2020-02-23 Andreas Enge <andreas-at-enge.fr> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  598. 2020-02-23 Andreas Enge <andreas-at-enge.fr> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  599. 2020-02-23 Andreas Enge <andreas-at-enge.fr> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  600. 2020-02-23 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU social contract
  601. 2020-02-23 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  602. 2020-02-23 Andreas Enge <andreas-at-enge.fr> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  603. 2020-02-23 From: "Federico Leva (Nemo)" <nemowiki-at-gmail.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  604. 2020-02-23 Mark Galassi <mark-at-galassi.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU social
  605. 2020-02-23 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  606. 2020-02-23 From: "J.B. Nicholson" <jbn-at-forestfield.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from your
  607. 2020-02-23 From: "J.B. Nicholson" <jbn-at-forestfield.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from your
  608. 2020-02-23 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  609. 2020-02-23 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  610. 2020-02-23 Eli Zaretskii <eliz-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  611. 2020-02-23 Andreas Enge <andreas-at-enge.fr> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] lese majeste
  612. 2020-02-23 Mark Wielaard <mjw-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing the GNU social contract
  613. 2020-02-23 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] [rms-at-gnu.org: Structure and Administration of the
  614. 2020-02-23 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] lese majeste
  615. 2020-02-23 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  616. 2020-02-23 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] some gnu maintainers more equal than others?
  617. 2020-02-24 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] lese majeste
  618. 2020-02-24 From: "Andreas R." <avr-at-softwarelibre.nl> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  619. 2020-02-24 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov-at-yandex.ru> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  620. 2020-02-24 nipponmail-at-firemail.cc Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  621. 2020-02-23 Mike Gerwitz <mtg-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  622. 2020-02-23 Mike Gerwitz <mtg-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  623. 2020-02-23 Mike Gerwitz <mtg-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  624. 2020-02-23 Mike Gerwitz <mtg-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  625. 2020-02-23 Mike Gerwitz <mtg-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  626. 2020-02-23 Mike Gerwitz <mtg-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  627. 2020-02-23 From: "D. Joe" <cabal-at-etrumeus.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] [conspire] Dying Languages, Server-Side Swift
  628. 2020-02-23 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  629. 2020-02-23 DJ Delorie <dj-at-delorie.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  630. 2020-02-23 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  631. 2020-02-23 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  632. 2020-02-23 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  633. 2020-02-23 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] lese majeste
  634. 2020-02-23 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  635. 2020-02-23 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing a GNU social contract
  636. 2020-02-23 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  637. 2020-02-23 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  638. 2020-02-23 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  639. 2020-02-24 From: "Andreas R." <avr-at-softwarelibre.nl> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  640. 2020-02-24 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov-at-yandex.ru> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  641. 2020-02-24 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  642. 2020-02-24 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  643. 2020-02-24 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  644. 2020-02-24 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  645. 2020-02-24 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  646. 2020-02-24 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] lese majeste
  647. 2020-02-24 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  648. 2020-02-24 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Endorsing a GNU social contract
  649. 2020-02-24 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  650. 2020-02-24 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  651. 2020-02-24 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  652. 2020-02-23 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  653. 2020-02-22 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  654. 2020-02-22 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  655. 2020-02-22 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  656. 2020-02-22 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  657. 2020-02-22 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  658. 2020-02-22 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  659. 2020-02-22 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  660. 2020-02-22 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  661. 2020-02-22 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  662. 2020-02-22 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  663. 2020-02-22 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  664. 2020-02-22 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  665. 2020-02-22 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  666. 2020-02-22 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  667. 2020-02-20 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  668. 2020-02-22 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  669. 2020-02-22 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  670. 2020-02-24 Gabor Szabo <gabor-at-szabgab.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] [Perlweekly] #448 - What is Cor?
  671. 2020-02-23 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  672. 2020-02-24 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  673. 2020-02-24 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  674. 2020-02-24 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  675. 2020-02-24 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  676. 2020-02-24 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  677. 2020-02-24 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society <noreply-at-embs.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Pleased to Announce Plenary Speakers for MNM 2020
  678. 2020-02-24 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  679. 2020-02-24 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society <noreply-at-embs.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Pleased to Announce Plenary Speakers for MNM 2020
  680. 2020-02-24 Eli Zaretskii <eliz-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  681. 2020-02-24 From: "American Museum of Natural History" <publicprograms-at-amnh.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Explore the Movements of Stars and Galaxies at
  682. 2020-02-24 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  683. 2020-02-24 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  684. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  685. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  686. 2020-02-25 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov-at-yandex.ru> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  687. 2020-02-25 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  688. 2020-02-25 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  689. 2020-02-25 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov-at-yandex.ru> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  690. 2020-02-25 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  691. 2020-02-25 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  692. 2020-02-25 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] some gnu maintainers more equal than others?
  693. 2020-02-25 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  694. 2020-02-25 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  695. 2020-02-25 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  696. 2020-02-25 Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh-at-gotplt.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  697. 2020-02-25 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  698. 2020-02-25 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Moderation
  699. 2020-02-24 Mark Galassi <mark-at-galassi.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] praising our moderators
  700. 2020-02-24 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  701. 2020-02-24 Mike Gerwitz <mtg-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  702. 2020-02-24 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  703. 2020-02-24 Mike Gerwitz <mtg-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  704. 2020-02-24 Mike Gerwitz <mtg-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  705. 2020-02-24 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  706. 2020-02-24 orbulon--- via General GNU project and free software discussions Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  707. 2020-02-24 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  708. 2020-02-24 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  709. 2020-02-24 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  710. 2020-02-24 From: "J.B. Nicholson" <jbn-at-forestfield.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  711. 2020-02-24 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  712. 2020-02-24 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  713. 2020-02-24 Andy Wingo <wingo-at-pobox.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  714. 2020-02-24 Ian Lance Taylor <ian-at-airs.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Harrassment on this list
  715. 2020-02-24 Dmitry Gutov <dgutov-at-yandex.ru> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  716. 2020-02-24 Taylan Kammer <taylan.kammer-at-gmail.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  717. 2020-02-24 From: "J.B. Nicholson" <jbn-at-forestfield.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  718. 2020-02-24 Nathan Sidwell <nathan-at-acm.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Moderation
  719. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  720. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  721. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  722. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  723. 2020-02-25 NYOUG <execdir-at-nyoug.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Upcoming Events for Oracle Professionals
  724. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  725. 2020-02-25 Greg KH <greg-at-kroah.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Need help to get started
  726. 2020-02-25 John Darrington <jmd-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  727. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  728. 2020-02-25 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  729. 2020-02-25 Andreas Enge <andreas-at-enge.fr> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  730. 2020-02-25 Andreas Enge <andreas-at-enge.fr> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  731. 2020-02-25 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  732. 2020-02-25 Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh-at-gotplt.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  733. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  734. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  735. 2020-02-25 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  736. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  737. 2020-02-25 From: "American Museum of Natural History" <fieldtrips-at-amnh.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Professional Studies Institute during Spring
  738. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  739. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  740. 2020-02-25 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  741. 2020-02-25 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  742. 2020-02-25 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  743. 2020-02-25 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] praising our moderators
  744. 2020-02-25 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  745. 2020-02-25 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  746. 2020-02-25 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  747. 2020-02-25 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  748. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  749. 2020-02-25 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  750. 2020-02-25 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  751. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  752. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  753. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  754. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  755. 2020-02-25 Leo Famulari <leo-at-famulari.name> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  756. 2020-02-25 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] lese majeste
  757. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] lese majeste
  758. 2020-02-25 orbulon-at-tutanota.com Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] lese majeste
  759. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] lese majeste
  760. 2020-02-25 From: "Andrew Engelbrecht, FSF" <info-at-fsf.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Coming soon: A new site for fully free
  761. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  762. 2020-02-25 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  763. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  764. 2020-02-25 Leo Famulari <leo-at-famulari.name> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  765. 2020-02-25 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  766. 2020-02-25 From: "HIRE NYC 2020" <jeff-at-gohiretalent.net> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Hire Alumni from NYU, Baruch, Fordham, Columbia,
  767. 2020-02-25 Mike Gerwitz <mtg-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] * Scraping email addresses from a public
  768. 2020-02-25 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  769. 2020-02-25 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  770. 2020-02-25 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  771. 2020-02-25 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  772. 2020-02-25 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  773. 2020-02-25 From: "J.B. Nicholson" <jbn-at-forestfield.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  774. 2020-02-25 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  775. 2020-02-25 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] State of the GNUnion 2020
  776. 2020-02-25 SUSE News <news-at-suse.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Get Certified During SUSECON 2020
  777. 2020-02-25 Amin Bandali <mab-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] praising our moderators
  778. 2020-02-25 From: "Federico Leva (Nemo)" <nemowiki-at-gmail.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] praising our moderators
  779. 2020-02-25 Taylan Kammer <taylan.kammer-at-gmail.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  780. 2020-02-25 Taylan Kammer <taylan.kammer-at-gmail.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com: Please remove me from
  781. 2020-02-25 From: "Mancini, Sabin (DFS)" <Sabin.Mancini-at-dfs.ny.gov> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] * Scraping email addresses from a public
  782. 2020-02-25 Taylan Kammer <taylan.kammer-at-gmail.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Don't add the NYLXS list to your To: or Cc: fields
  783. 2020-02-26 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Don't add the NYLXS list to your To: or Cc:
  784. 2020-02-26 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] The GNU Problem and NYLXS
  785. 2020-02-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] It seems we need a refresher class in the obvious
  786. 2020-02-27 Mark Wielaard <mjw-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  787. 2020-02-27 Mark Wielaard <mjw-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  788. 2020-02-27 Mark Wielaard <mjw-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  789. 2020-02-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  790. 2020-02-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  791. 2020-02-27 siddhesh-at-gotplt.org Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  792. 2020-02-27 Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh-at-gotplt.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  793. 2020-02-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  794. 2020-02-27 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  795. 2020-02-27 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  796. 2020-02-27 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  797. 2020-02-27 Alexandre =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Garreau <galex-713-at-galex-713.eu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  798. 2020-02-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  799. 2020-02-27 From: "Andreas R." <avr-at-softwarelibre.nl> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  800. 2020-02-27 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  801. 2020-02-27 From: "Andreas R." <avr-at-softwarelibre.nl> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  802. 2020-02-27 Healthcare Update News Service <admin-at-healthcareupdatenewsservice.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Accountable Care News: Washington DC Watch: AHIP
  803. 2020-02-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  804. 2020-02-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  805. 2020-02-27 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU/Guix
  806. 2020-02-27 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  807. 2020-02-27 Matthew <matthew-at-fastchassisracecars.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Accelerated programs to receive Bachelors in just
  808. 2020-02-27 Shule SAPHIRE <shulie_release-at-optimum.net> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU/Guix
  809. 2020-02-27 Mark Wielaard <mark-at-klomp.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  810. 2020-02-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  811. 2020-02-27 Daniel Pocock <daniel-at-pocock.pro> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  812. 2020-02-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] This rebilion has been cooking in the FSF for a
  813. 2020-02-28 Eli Zaretskii <eliz-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  814. 2020-02-28 Mike Gerwitz <mtg-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU/Guix
  815. 2020-02-27 Mike Gerwitz <mtg-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  816. 2020-02-27 Mike Gerwitz <mtg-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  817. 2020-02-27 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU/Guix
  818. 2020-02-27 From: "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <936-846-2769-at-kylheku.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU/Guix
  819. 2020-02-28 Ruben Safir <ruben.safir-at-my.liu.edu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU/Guix
  820. 2020-02-28 Ruben Safir <ruben.safir-at-my.liu.edu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  821. 2020-02-28 Ruben Safir <ruben.safir-at-my.liu.edu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  822. 2020-02-28 Ruben Safir <ruben.safir-at-my.liu.edu> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU/Guix
  823. 2020-02-28 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU/Guix
  824. 2020-02-28 Daniel Pocock <daniel-at-pocock.pro> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  825. 2020-02-28 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  826. 2020-02-28 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Van Gogh was right all along
  827. 2020-02-28 Mark Wielaard <mjw-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  828. 2020-02-28 Charlie Gonzalez <itcharlie-at-gmail.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Perl Meetup Location updates
  829. 2020-02-28 Daniel Pocock <daniel-at-pocock.pro> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  830. 2020-02-28 shulie <shulie_release-at-optimum.net> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU/Guix
  831. 2020-02-28 From: "Federico Leva (Nemo)" <nemowiki-at-gmail.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  832. 2020-02-28 Eli Zaretskii <eliz-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] The General Public Licence (GPL) as the basic
  833. 2020-02-28 Mike Gerwitz <mtg-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU/Guix
  834. 2020-02-27 Mike Gerwitz <mtg-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  835. 2020-02-28 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  836. 2020-02-28 Mike Gerwitz <mtg-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  837. 2020-02-28 Mike Gerwitz <mtg-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  838. 2020-02-29 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  839. 2020-02-29 aviva <aviva-at-gmx.us> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Shannon Dosemagen and the FSF
  840. 2020-02-29 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Shannon Dosemagen and the FSF
  841. 2020-02-29 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Why the "social contract" should not be
  842. 2020-02-29 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] feeling intimidated for endorsing the GNU
  843. 2020-02-29 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] FSF + GNU relationship
  844. 2020-02-29 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Groucho would never be allowed in the FSF today
  845. 2020-02-29 aviva <aviva-at-gmx.us> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Shannon Dosemagen and the FSF
  846. 2020-02-10 Ruben <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the GNU Social contract and
  847. 2020-02-24 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] lese majeste
  848. 2020-02-29 aviva <aviva-at-gmx.us> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Shannon Dosemagen and the FSF
  849. 2020-02-27 Ruben Safir via artix-general <artix-general-at-artixlinux.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] [artix-general] GNU Shepherd init

NYLXS are Do'ers and the first step of Doing is Joining! Join NYLXS and make a difference in your community today!