MESSAGE
| DATE | 2015-07-05 |
| FROM | Ruben
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS deleted
|
From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Sun Jul 5 13:44:26 2015
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix)
id 98BE01610B1; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 13:44:25 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28)
id 6D15516112F; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 13:44:25 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ABA11610B1
for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 13:44:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.10.10.120] (ool-4351838b.dyn.optonline.net [67.81.131.139])
by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D446416666
for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 13:43:59 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS deleted
To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
References: <559006DB.6010001-at-panix.com>
<20150628222839.GN20932-at-linuxmafia.com> <55908047.5060706-at-panix.com>
<20150628233902.GS20932-at-linuxmafia.com> <20150630145445.GA13063-at-panix.com>
<20150630183051.GD20932-at-linuxmafia.com>
<20150630183315.GE20932-at-linuxmafia.com>
From: Ruben
Message-ID: <55996EEE.3010608-at-panix.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 13:52:46 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/38.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150630183315.GE20932-at-linuxmafia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
[NYLXS: HANGOUT]
X-BeenThere: hangout-at-nylxs.com
X-Mailing-list: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Precedence: list
List-Id: NYLXS General Discussion Forum
List-Unsubscribe:
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe:
the functional reality of there being roaming bands of editors with
agendas still exists and manifests itself in several ways.
On 06/30/2015 02:33 PM, Rick Moen wrote:
>
> I wrote:
>
>> The pseudonymous editors seemed to take particular glee in viciously
>> slagging well-known people who participated.
>
> Forgot to add: This trend has apparently been mostly curbed by a reform
> in which Wikipedia has started more consistently enforcing its Biography
> of Living Persons policy -- but the pattern was really bad 5-10 years
> ago, before that reform.
>
>
|
|
