MESSAGE
DATE | 2015-07-05 |
FROM | Ruben
|
SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS deleted
|
From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Sun Jul 5 13:44:26 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) id 98BE01610B1; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 13:44:25 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28) id 6D15516112F; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 13:44:25 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89]) by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ABA11610B1 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 13:44:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.10.10.120] (ool-4351838b.dyn.optonline.net [67.81.131.139]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D446416666 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 13:43:59 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS deleted To: hangout-at-nylxs.com References: <559006DB.6010001-at-panix.com> <20150628222839.GN20932-at-linuxmafia.com> <55908047.5060706-at-panix.com> <20150628233902.GS20932-at-linuxmafia.com> <20150630145445.GA13063-at-panix.com> <20150630183051.GD20932-at-linuxmafia.com> <20150630183315.GE20932-at-linuxmafia.com> From: Ruben Message-ID: <55996EEE.3010608-at-panix.com> Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 13:52:46 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150630183315.GE20932-at-linuxmafia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com [NYLXS: HANGOUT] X-BeenThere: hangout-at-nylxs.com X-Mailing-list: hangout-at-nylxs.com Precedence: list List-Id: NYLXS General Discussion Forum List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe:
the functional reality of there being roaming bands of editors with agendas still exists and manifests itself in several ways.
On 06/30/2015 02:33 PM, Rick Moen wrote: > > I wrote: > >> The pseudonymous editors seemed to take particular glee in viciously >> slagging well-known people who participated. > > Forgot to add: This trend has apparently been mostly curbed by a reform > in which Wikipedia has started more consistently enforcing its Biography > of Living Persons policy -- but the pattern was really bad 5-10 years > ago, before that reform. > >
|
|