MESSAGE
| DATE | 2016-02-26 |
| FROM | From: "Free Software Foundation"
|
| SUBJECT | Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] UPDATE: U.S. Copyright Office requiring proprietary
|
From hangout-bounces-at-nylxs.com Fri Feb 26 21:10:04 2016
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: from www.mrbrklyn.com (www.mrbrklyn.com [96.57.23.82])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD88B1616C6;
Fri, 26 Feb 2016 21:09:45 -0500 (EST)
X-Original-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Delivered-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 58FDF1616C7; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 21:08:24 -0500 (EST)
Resent-From: Ruben Safir
Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 21:08:24 -0500
Resent-Message-ID: <20160227020824.GA30228-at-www.mrbrklyn.com>
Resent-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
X-Original-To: ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [208.118.235.92])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65E31616C6
for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:09:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [208.118.235.182] (port=48957 helo=crmserver1p.fsf.org)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from )
id 1aZLtt-00005X-Rq
for ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:09:57 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by crmserver1p.fsf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82)
(envelope-from )
id 1aZLtt-00007s-Mj
for ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:09:57 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Free Software Foundation"
job_id: 141831
To: Ruben Safir
Precedence: bulk
X-CiviMail-Bounce: crmmailer+b.141831.17966261.a4a00a32e9e1098c-at-fsf.org
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:09:57 -0500
Message-Id:
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] UPDATE: U.S. Copyright Office requiring proprietary
software for DMCA anti-circumvention comments
X-BeenThere: hangout-at-nylxs.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: Free Software Foundation ,
NYLXS Discussions List
List-Id: NYLXS Discussions List
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1465418332=="
Errors-To: hangout-bounces-at-nylxs.com
Sender: "hangout"
--===============1465418332==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_58e84610957c14fa08a14ce192b98272"
--=_58e84610957c14fa08a14ce192b98272
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Dear Ruben Safir,
You are receiving this email because you took a stand against
[Digital Restrictions Management (DRM)][0] being included in the HTML5
standard, and this action is directly related to the future of DRM on
the Web.
[0]: https://www.defectivebydesign.org/no-drm-in-html5
Last week, working with our Defective By Design team,
[we asked people][1] to co-sign a comment that we, the Free Software
Foundation (FSF), will be submitting to the U.S. Copyright Office for
their study of the anti-circumvention provisions of the DMCA (17
U.S.C. 1201). Our comment sends a simple and clear message: the DMCA's
anti-circumvention provisions, including the triennial exemption
granting process, are broken beyond repair and the only way to fix
this law is to repeal it altogether. **The Copyright Office has
extended the comment period, and so our
[comment is now open for public co-signing][2] until noon EST (5pm
UTC) on March 2nd.** The DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions threaten
computer-users with legal consequences for bypassing digital DRM and
individuals can face criminal penalties for sharing software designed
to bypass particular DRM technologies.
[Will you co-sign our comment][2] and join us in taking a stand
against this attack on freedom and declare that you too want to see an
end to the DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions?
[1]: https://www.defectivebydesign.org/dmca-anti-circumvention-comment
[2]: https://my.fsf.org/civicrm/profile/create?gid=439&reset=1
When we published our comment and put out our call for co-signers, we
were still waiting to hear back from the Copyright Office for
instructions on where we could send a printed copy of our comment or
an alternate way to submit a digital copy. Specifically, we asked for
a medium or method of submitting a comment that did not require
running proprietary JavaScript. We have now gotten a reply from them,
and it is very disappointing news. They have denied our request to
submit our comment on paper or digitally without the use of
proprietary software, stating: "we cannot allow submission of comments
outside the regulations.gov system on the basis of your objection to
the use of proprietary software."
Like any other program, JavaScript is software you download and run on
your computer, and so [you deserve][3] to have control over that
program, which means that it should be provided to you under a free
software license. The JavaScript served by Regulations.gov is
non-trivial and very complex proprietary software. In fact, after
downloading the first few JavaScript files from Regulations.gov, we
found that these files alone totaled over 740,000 characters in
length. These are minified JavaScript files, which unlike source
files, do not contain long variable names or comments, etc. To put
this in perspective, the feature rich, popular, and mature jQuery
JavaScript library, when minified, is only 97,403 characters in
length. It's not clear what the JavaScript on Regulations.gov does or
why it is necessary or useful. All we know is that it is required to
download and run on your computer if you want to submit a comment
through the site. [We have previously][4] tried to persuade
Regulations.gov to eliminate the proprietary JavaScript from their
site, and have urged them that if they will not release it as free
software, to at least make it so you do not have to run it in order to
submit a comment.
[3]: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns/freejs
[4]: https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/take-action-for-free-javascript
Regardless of whether Regulations.gov chooses to fix this problem, it
is troubling that the U.S. Copyright Office won't even acknowledge
that a citizen's refusal to run proprietary software is a reasonable
choice. The public should be able to communicate with government
agencies without being forced to use proprietary software which is
owned and controlled by some corporation. It's like saying that
individuals have to be wearing Nike brand sneakers in order to have a
meeting with their congressperson -- with the additional complication
that the software also directly violates individuals' freedoms.
As such, our plan is to deliver our comment (with signatures) by hand
to the U.S. Copyright Office next Thursday, March 3rd, and alongside
this, we will also deliver a letter that explains why they should not
require proprietary JavaScript to submit comments.
Here is what you can do to help:
* If you are in the U.S. or are a U.S. citizen living in another
country, [co-sign our comment][2] and encourage others to do the
same.
* Email our campaigns manager, Zak Rogoff, at by
Tuesday, March 1st, to let us know if you would like to join us in
Washington D.C. to deliver the letter on March 3rd.
* [Make a donation][5] to support our work defending computer user
freedom and our campaign to oppose DRM.
* If you are neither living in the U.S. nor a U.S. citizen living
abroad, [please join our Free JavaScript Action Team][6] and take
action against the government agencies in your own country that
require the use of non-free JavaScript.
[5]: https://donate.fsf.org
[6]: https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:Free_Javascript_Action_Team
Happy Hacking,
Joshua Gay & Donald Robertson
FSF Licensing Team
*Read and share online: *
--
* Follow us at .
* Subscribe to our RSS feeds at .
* Join us as an associate member at .
Sent from the Free Software Foundation,
51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor
Boston, Massachusetts 02110-1335
UNITED STATES
You can unsubscribe from this mailing list by visiting
https://my.fsf.org/civicrm/mailing/unsubscribe?reset=1&jid=141831&qid=17966261&h=a4a00a32e9e1098c.
To stop all email from the Free Software Foundation, including Defective by Design,
and the Free Software Supporter newsletter, visit
https://my.fsf.org/civicrm/mailing/optout?reset=1&jid=141831&qid=17966261&h=a4a00a32e9e1098c.
--=_58e84610957c14fa08a14ce192b98272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Free Software Foundation
Dear Ruben Safir,
You are receiving this email because you took a stand against
[1]Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) being included in the HTML5
standard, and this action is directly related to the future of DRM on
the Web.
Last week, working with our Defective By Design team, [2]we asked
people to co-sign a comment that we, the Free Software Foundation
(FSF), will be submitting to the U.S. Copyright Office for their study
of the anti-circumvention provisions of the DMCA (17 U.S.C. 1201). Our
comment sends a simple and clear message: the DMCA's anti-circumvention
provisions, including the triennial exemption granting process, are
broken beyond repair and the only way to fix this law is to repeal it
altogether. The Copyright Office has extended the comment period, and
so our [3]comment is now open for public co-signing until noon EST (5pm
UTC) on March 2nd. The DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions threaten
computer-users with legal consequences for bypassing digital DRM and
individuals can face criminal penalties for sharing software designed
to bypass particular DRM technologies. [4]Will you co-sign our comment
and join us in taking a stand against this attack on freedom and
declare that you too want to see an end to the DMCA's
anti-circumvention provisions?
When we published our comment and put out our call for co-signers, we
were still waiting to hear back from the Copyright Office for
instructions on where we could send a printed copy of our comment or an
alternate way to submit a digital copy. Specifically, we asked for a
medium or method of submitting a comment that did not require running
proprietary JavaScript. We have now gotten a reply from them, and it is
very disappointing news. They have denied our request to submit our
comment on paper or digitally without the use of proprietary software,
stating: "we cannot allow submission of comments outside the
regulations.gov system on the basis of your objection to the use of
proprietary software."
Like any other program, JavaScript is software you download and run on
your computer, and so [5]you deserve to have control over that program,
which means that it should be provided to you under a free software
license. The JavaScript served by Regulations.gov is non-trivial and
very complex proprietary software. In fact, after downloading the first
few JavaScript files from Regulations.gov, we found that these files
alone totaled over 740,000 characters in length. These are minified
JavaScript files, which unlike source files, do not contain long
variable names or comments, etc. To put this in perspective, the
feature rich, popular, and mature jQuery JavaScript library, when
minified, is only 97,403 characters in length. It's not clear what the
JavaScript on Regulations.gov does or why it is necessary or useful.
All we know is that it is required to download and run on your computer
if you want to submit a comment through the site. [6]We have previously
tried to persuade Regulations.gov to eliminate the proprietary
JavaScript from their site, and have urged them that if they will not
release it as free software, to at least make it so you do not have to
run it in order to submit a comment.
Regardless of whether Regulations.gov chooses to fix this problem, it
is troubling that the U.S. Copyright Office won't even acknowledge that
a citizen's refusal to run proprietary software is a reasonable choice.
The public should be able to communicate with government agencies
without being forced to use proprietary software which is owned and
controlled by some corporation. It's like saying that individuals have
to be wearing Nike brand sneakers in order to have a meeting with their
congressperson -- with the additional complication that the software
also directly violates individuals' freedoms.
As such, our plan is to deliver our comment (with signatures) by hand
to the U.S. Copyright Office next Thursday, March 3rd, and alongside
this, we will also deliver a letter that explains why they should not
require proprietary JavaScript to submit comments.
Here is what you can do to help:
* If you are in the U.S. or are a U.S. citizen living in another
country, [7]co-sign our comment and encourage others to do the
same.
* Email our campaigns manager, Zak Rogoff, at [8]campaigns-at-fsf.org by
Tuesday, March 1st, to let us know if you would like to join us in
Washington D.C. to deliver the letter on March 3rd.
* [9]Make a donation to support our work defending computer user
freedom and our campaign to oppose DRM.
* If you are neither living in the U.S. nor a U.S. citizen living
abroad, [10]please join our Free JavaScript Action Team and take
action against the government agencies in your own country that
require the use of non-free JavaScript.
Happy Hacking,
Joshua Gay & Donald Robertson
FSF Licensing Team
Read and share online:
[11]https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/the-u-s-copyright-office-requir
ing-proprietary-software-in-dmca-anti-circumvention-study
[12]Follow us on GNU social | [13]Subscribe to our blogs via RSS |
[14]Join us as an associate member
Sent from the Free Software Foundation,
51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor
Boston, Massachusetts 02110-1335
UNITED STATES
[15]Unsubscribe from this mailing list.
[16]Stop all email from the Free Software Foundation, including
Defective by Design, and the Free Software Supporter newsletter.
References
1. https://www.defectivebydesign.org/no-drm-in-html5
2. https://www.defectivebydesign.org/dmca-anti-circumvention-comment
3. https://my.fsf.org/civicrm/profile/create?gid=439&reset=1
4. https://my.fsf.org/civicrm/profile/create?gid=439&reset=1
5. https://www.fsf.org/campaigns/freejs
6. https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/take-action-for-free-javascript
7. https://my.fsf.org/civicrm/profile/create?gid=439&reset=1
8. mailto:campaigns-at-fsf.org
9. https://donate.fsf.org/
10. https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:Free_Javascript_Action_Team
11. https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/the-u-s-copyright-office-requiring-proprietary-software-in-dmca-anti-circumvention-study
12. https://status.fsf.org/fsf
13. https://fsf.org/blogs/RSS
14. https://www.fsf.org/jf
15. https://my.fsf.org/civicrm/mailing/unsubscribe?reset=1&jid=141831&qid=17966261&h=a4a00a32e9e1098c
16. https://my.fsf.org/civicrm/mailing/optout?reset=1&jid=141831&qid=17966261&h=a4a00a32e9e1098c
--=_58e84610957c14fa08a14ce192b98272--
--===============1465418332==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
hangout mailing list
hangout-at-nylxs.com
http://www.nylxs.com/
--===============1465418332==--
--===============1465418332==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_58e84610957c14fa08a14ce192b98272"
--=_58e84610957c14fa08a14ce192b98272
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Dear Ruben Safir,
You are receiving this email because you took a stand against
[Digital Restrictions Management (DRM)][0] being included in the HTML5
standard, and this action is directly related to the future of DRM on
the Web.
[0]: https://www.defectivebydesign.org/no-drm-in-html5
Last week, working with our Defective By Design team,
[we asked people][1] to co-sign a comment that we, the Free Software
Foundation (FSF), will be submitting to the U.S. Copyright Office for
their study of the anti-circumvention provisions of the DMCA (17
U.S.C. 1201). Our comment sends a simple and clear message: the DMCA's
anti-circumvention provisions, including the triennial exemption
granting process, are broken beyond repair and the only way to fix
this law is to repeal it altogether. **The Copyright Office has
extended the comment period, and so our
[comment is now open for public co-signing][2] until noon EST (5pm
UTC) on March 2nd.** The DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions threaten
computer-users with legal consequences for bypassing digital DRM and
individuals can face criminal penalties for sharing software designed
to bypass particular DRM technologies.
[Will you co-sign our comment][2] and join us in taking a stand
against this attack on freedom and declare that you too want to see an
end to the DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions?
[1]: https://www.defectivebydesign.org/dmca-anti-circumvention-comment
[2]: https://my.fsf.org/civicrm/profile/create?gid=439&reset=1
When we published our comment and put out our call for co-signers, we
were still waiting to hear back from the Copyright Office for
instructions on where we could send a printed copy of our comment or
an alternate way to submit a digital copy. Specifically, we asked for
a medium or method of submitting a comment that did not require
running proprietary JavaScript. We have now gotten a reply from them,
and it is very disappointing news. They have denied our request to
submit our comment on paper or digitally without the use of
proprietary software, stating: "we cannot allow submission of comments
outside the regulations.gov system on the basis of your objection to
the use of proprietary software."
Like any other program, JavaScript is software you download and run on
your computer, and so [you deserve][3] to have control over that
program, which means that it should be provided to you under a free
software license. The JavaScript served by Regulations.gov is
non-trivial and very complex proprietary software. In fact, after
downloading the first few JavaScript files from Regulations.gov, we
found that these files alone totaled over 740,000 characters in
length. These are minified JavaScript files, which unlike source
files, do not contain long variable names or comments, etc. To put
this in perspective, the feature rich, popular, and mature jQuery
JavaScript library, when minified, is only 97,403 characters in
length. It's not clear what the JavaScript on Regulations.gov does or
why it is necessary or useful. All we know is that it is required to
download and run on your computer if you want to submit a comment
through the site. [We have previously][4] tried to persuade
Regulations.gov to eliminate the proprietary JavaScript from their
site, and have urged them that if they will not release it as free
software, to at least make it so you do not have to run it in order to
submit a comment.
[3]: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns/freejs
[4]: https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/take-action-for-free-javascript
Regardless of whether Regulations.gov chooses to fix this problem, it
is troubling that the U.S. Copyright Office won't even acknowledge
that a citizen's refusal to run proprietary software is a reasonable
choice. The public should be able to communicate with government
agencies without being forced to use proprietary software which is
owned and controlled by some corporation. It's like saying that
individuals have to be wearing Nike brand sneakers in order to have a
meeting with their congressperson -- with the additional complication
that the software also directly violates individuals' freedoms.
As such, our plan is to deliver our comment (with signatures) by hand
to the U.S. Copyright Office next Thursday, March 3rd, and alongside
this, we will also deliver a letter that explains why they should not
require proprietary JavaScript to submit comments.
Here is what you can do to help:
* If you are in the U.S. or are a U.S. citizen living in another
country, [co-sign our comment][2] and encourage others to do the
same.
* Email our campaigns manager, Zak Rogoff, at by
Tuesday, March 1st, to let us know if you would like to join us in
Washington D.C. to deliver the letter on March 3rd.
* [Make a donation][5] to support our work defending computer user
freedom and our campaign to oppose DRM.
* If you are neither living in the U.S. nor a U.S. citizen living
abroad, [please join our Free JavaScript Action Team][6] and take
action against the government agencies in your own country that
require the use of non-free JavaScript.
[5]: https://donate.fsf.org
[6]: https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:Free_Javascript_Action_Team
Happy Hacking,
Joshua Gay & Donald Robertson
FSF Licensing Team
*Read and share online: *
--
* Follow us at .
* Subscribe to our RSS feeds at .
* Join us as an associate member at .
Sent from the Free Software Foundation,
51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor
Boston, Massachusetts 02110-1335
UNITED STATES
You can unsubscribe from this mailing list by visiting
https://my.fsf.org/civicrm/mailing/unsubscribe?reset=1&jid=141831&qid=17966261&h=a4a00a32e9e1098c.
To stop all email from the Free Software Foundation, including Defective by Design,
and the Free Software Supporter newsletter, visit
https://my.fsf.org/civicrm/mailing/optout?reset=1&jid=141831&qid=17966261&h=a4a00a32e9e1098c.
--=_58e84610957c14fa08a14ce192b98272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Free Software Foundation
Dear Ruben Safir,
You are receiving this email because you took a stand against
[1]Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) being included in the HTML5
standard, and this action is directly related to the future of DRM on
the Web.
Last week, working with our Defective By Design team, [2]we asked
people to co-sign a comment that we, the Free Software Foundation
(FSF), will be submitting to the U.S. Copyright Office for their study
of the anti-circumvention provisions of the DMCA (17 U.S.C. 1201). Our
comment sends a simple and clear message: the DMCA's anti-circumvention
provisions, including the triennial exemption granting process, are
broken beyond repair and the only way to fix this law is to repeal it
altogether. The Copyright Office has extended the comment period, and
so our [3]comment is now open for public co-signing until noon EST (5pm
UTC) on March 2nd. The DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions threaten
computer-users with legal consequences for bypassing digital DRM and
individuals can face criminal penalties for sharing software designed
to bypass particular DRM technologies. [4]Will you co-sign our comment
and join us in taking a stand against this attack on freedom and
declare that you too want to see an end to the DMCA's
anti-circumvention provisions?
When we published our comment and put out our call for co-signers, we
were still waiting to hear back from the Copyright Office for
instructions on where we could send a printed copy of our comment or an
alternate way to submit a digital copy. Specifically, we asked for a
medium or method of submitting a comment that did not require running
proprietary JavaScript. We have now gotten a reply from them, and it is
very disappointing news. They have denied our request to submit our
comment on paper or digitally without the use of proprietary software,
stating: "we cannot allow submission of comments outside the
regulations.gov system on the basis of your objection to the use of
proprietary software."
Like any other program, JavaScript is software you download and run on
your computer, and so [5]you deserve to have control over that program,
which means that it should be provided to you under a free software
license. The JavaScript served by Regulations.gov is non-trivial and
very complex proprietary software. In fact, after downloading the first
few JavaScript files from Regulations.gov, we found that these files
alone totaled over 740,000 characters in length. These are minified
JavaScript files, which unlike source files, do not contain long
variable names or comments, etc. To put this in perspective, the
feature rich, popular, and mature jQuery JavaScript library, when
minified, is only 97,403 characters in length. It's not clear what the
JavaScript on Regulations.gov does or why it is necessary or useful.
All we know is that it is required to download and run on your computer
if you want to submit a comment through the site. [6]We have previously
tried to persuade Regulations.gov to eliminate the proprietary
JavaScript from their site, and have urged them that if they will not
release it as free software, to at least make it so you do not have to
run it in order to submit a comment.
Regardless of whether Regulations.gov chooses to fix this problem, it
is troubling that the U.S. Copyright Office won't even acknowledge that
a citizen's refusal to run proprietary software is a reasonable choice.
The public should be able to communicate with government agencies
without being forced to use proprietary software which is owned and
controlled by some corporation. It's like saying that individuals have
to be wearing Nike brand sneakers in order to have a meeting with their
congressperson -- with the additional complication that the software
also directly violates individuals' freedoms.
As such, our plan is to deliver our comment (with signatures) by hand
to the U.S. Copyright Office next Thursday, March 3rd, and alongside
this, we will also deliver a letter that explains why they should not
require proprietary JavaScript to submit comments.
Here is what you can do to help:
* If you are in the U.S. or are a U.S. citizen living in another
country, [7]co-sign our comment and encourage others to do the
same.
* Email our campaigns manager, Zak Rogoff, at [8]campaigns-at-fsf.org by
Tuesday, March 1st, to let us know if you would like to join us in
Washington D.C. to deliver the letter on March 3rd.
* [9]Make a donation to support our work defending computer user
freedom and our campaign to oppose DRM.
* If you are neither living in the U.S. nor a U.S. citizen living
abroad, [10]please join our Free JavaScript Action Team and take
action against the government agencies in your own country that
require the use of non-free JavaScript.
Happy Hacking,
Joshua Gay & Donald Robertson
FSF Licensing Team
Read and share online:
[11]https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/the-u-s-copyright-office-requir
ing-proprietary-software-in-dmca-anti-circumvention-study
[12]Follow us on GNU social | [13]Subscribe to our blogs via RSS |
[14]Join us as an associate member
Sent from the Free Software Foundation,
51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor
Boston, Massachusetts 02110-1335
UNITED STATES
[15]Unsubscribe from this mailing list.
[16]Stop all email from the Free Software Foundation, including
Defective by Design, and the Free Software Supporter newsletter.
References
1. https://www.defectivebydesign.org/no-drm-in-html5
2. https://www.defectivebydesign.org/dmca-anti-circumvention-comment
3. https://my.fsf.org/civicrm/profile/create?gid=439&reset=1
4. https://my.fsf.org/civicrm/profile/create?gid=439&reset=1
5. https://www.fsf.org/campaigns/freejs
6. https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/take-action-for-free-javascript
7. https://my.fsf.org/civicrm/profile/create?gid=439&reset=1
8. mailto:campaigns-at-fsf.org
9. https://donate.fsf.org/
10. https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:Free_Javascript_Action_Team
11. https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/the-u-s-copyright-office-requiring-proprietary-software-in-dmca-anti-circumvention-study
12. https://status.fsf.org/fsf
13. https://fsf.org/blogs/RSS
14. https://www.fsf.org/jf
15. https://my.fsf.org/civicrm/mailing/unsubscribe?reset=1&jid=141831&qid=17966261&h=a4a00a32e9e1098c
16. https://my.fsf.org/civicrm/mailing/optout?reset=1&jid=141831&qid=17966261&h=a4a00a32e9e1098c
--=_58e84610957c14fa08a14ce192b98272--
--===============1465418332==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
hangout mailing list
hangout-at-nylxs.com
http://www.nylxs.com/
--===============1465418332==--
|
|
