Fri Mar 29 05:00:42 2024
EVENTS
 FREE
SOFTWARE
INSTITUTE

POLITICS
JOBS
MEMBERS'
CORNER

MAILING
LIST

NYLXS Mailing Lists and Archives
NYLXS Members have a lot to say and share but we don't keep many secrets. Join the Hangout Mailing List and say your peice.

DATE 2016-09-01

HANGOUT

2024-03-29 | 2024-02-29 | 2024-01-29 | 2023-12-29 | 2023-11-29 | 2023-10-29 | 2023-09-29 | 2023-08-29 | 2023-07-29 | 2023-06-29 | 2023-05-29 | 2023-04-29 | 2023-03-29 | 2023-02-28 | 2023-01-28 | 2022-12-28 | 2022-11-28 | 2022-10-28 | 2022-09-28 | 2022-08-28 | 2022-07-28 | 2022-06-28 | 2022-05-28 | 2022-04-28 | 2022-03-28 | 2022-02-28 | 2022-01-28 | 2021-12-28 | 2021-11-28 | 2021-10-28 | 2021-09-28 | 2021-08-28 | 2021-07-28 | 2021-06-28 | 2021-05-28 | 2021-04-28 | 2021-03-28 | 2021-02-28 | 2021-01-28 | 2020-12-28 | 2020-11-28 | 2020-10-28 | 2020-09-28 | 2020-08-28 | 2020-07-28 | 2020-06-28 | 2020-05-28 | 2020-04-28 | 2020-03-28 | 2020-02-28 | 2020-01-28 | 2019-12-28 | 2019-11-28 | 2019-10-28 | 2019-09-28 | 2019-08-28 | 2019-07-28 | 2019-06-28 | 2019-05-28 | 2019-04-28 | 2019-03-28 | 2019-02-28 | 2019-01-28 | 2018-12-28 | 2018-11-28 | 2018-10-28 | 2018-09-28 | 2018-08-28 | 2018-07-28 | 2018-06-28 | 2018-05-28 | 2018-04-28 | 2018-03-28 | 2018-02-28 | 2018-01-28 | 2017-12-28 | 2017-11-28 | 2017-10-28 | 2017-09-28 | 2017-08-28 | 2017-07-28 | 2017-06-28 | 2017-05-28 | 2017-04-28 | 2017-03-28 | 2017-02-28 | 2017-01-28 | 2016-12-28 | 2016-11-28 | 2016-10-28 | 2016-09-28 | 2016-08-28 | 2016-07-28 | 2016-06-28 | 2016-05-28 | 2016-04-28 | 2016-03-28 | 2016-02-28 | 2016-01-28 | 2015-12-28 | 2015-11-28 | 2015-10-28 | 2015-09-28 | 2015-08-28 | 2015-07-28 | 2015-06-28 | 2015-05-28 | 2015-04-28 | 2015-03-28 | 2015-02-28 | 2015-01-28 | 2014-12-28 | 2014-11-28 | 2014-10-28 | 2014-09-28 | 2014-08-28 | 2014-07-28 | 2014-06-28 | 2014-05-28 | 2014-04-28 | 2014-03-28 | 2014-02-28 | 2014-01-28 | 2013-12-28 | 2013-11-28 | 2013-10-28 | 2013-09-28 | 2013-08-28 | 2013-07-28 | 2013-06-28 | 2013-05-28 | 2013-04-28 | 2013-03-28 | 2013-02-28 | 2013-01-28 | 2012-12-28 | 2012-11-28 | 2012-10-28 | 2012-09-28 | 2012-08-28 | 2012-07-28 | 2012-06-28 | 2012-05-28 | 2012-04-28 | 2012-03-28 | 2012-02-28 | 2012-01-28 | 2011-12-28 | 2011-11-28 | 2011-10-28 | 2011-09-28 | 2011-08-28 | 2011-07-28 | 2011-06-28 | 2011-05-28 | 2011-04-28 | 2011-03-28 | 2011-02-28 | 2011-01-28 | 2010-12-28 | 2010-11-28 | 2010-10-28 | 2010-09-28 | 2010-08-28 | 2010-07-28 | 2010-06-28 | 2010-05-28 | 2010-04-28 | 2010-03-28 | 2010-02-28 | 2010-01-28 | 2009-12-28 | 2009-11-28 | 2009-10-28 | 2009-09-28 | 2009-08-28 | 2009-07-28 | 2009-06-28 | 2009-05-28 | 2009-04-28 | 2009-03-28 | 2009-02-28 | 2009-01-28 | 2008-12-28 | 2008-11-28 | 2008-10-28 | 2008-09-28 | 2008-08-28 | 2008-07-28 | 2008-06-28 | 2008-05-28 | 2008-04-28 | 2008-03-28 | 2008-02-28 | 2008-01-28 | 2007-12-28 | 2007-11-28 | 2007-10-28 | 2007-09-28 | 2007-08-28 | 2007-07-28 | 2007-06-28 | 2007-05-28 | 2007-04-28 | 2007-03-28 | 2007-02-28 | 2007-01-28 | 2006-12-28 | 2006-11-28 | 2006-10-28 | 2006-09-28 | 2006-08-28 | 2006-07-28 | 2006-06-28 | 2006-05-28 | 2006-04-28 | 2006-03-28 | 2006-02-28 | 2006-01-28 | 2005-12-28 | 2005-11-28 | 2005-10-28 | 2005-09-28 | 2005-08-28 | 2005-07-28 | 2005-06-28 | 2005-05-28 | 2005-04-28 | 2005-03-28 | 2005-02-28 | 2005-01-28 | 2004-12-28 | 2004-11-28 | 2004-10-28 | 2004-09-28 | 2004-08-28 | 2004-07-28 | 2004-06-28 | 2004-05-28 | 2004-04-28 | 2004-03-28 | 2004-02-28 | 2004-01-28 | 2003-12-28 | 2003-11-28 | 2003-10-28 | 2003-09-28 | 2003-08-28 | 2003-07-28 | 2003-06-28 | 2003-05-28 | 2003-04-28 | 2003-03-28 | 2003-02-28 | 2003-01-28 | 2002-12-28 | 2002-11-28 | 2002-10-28 | 2002-09-28 | 2002-08-28 | 2002-07-28 | 2002-06-28 | 2002-05-28 | 2002-04-28 | 2002-03-28 | 2002-02-28 | 2002-01-28 | 2001-12-28 | 2001-11-28 | 2001-10-28 | 2001-09-28 | 2001-08-28 | 2001-07-28 | 2001-06-28 | 2001-05-28 | 2001-04-28 | 2001-03-28 | 2001-02-28 | 2001-01-28 | 2000-12-28 | 2000-11-28 | 2000-10-28 | 2000-09-28 | 2000-08-28 | 2000-07-28 | 2000-06-28 | 2000-05-28 | 2000-04-28 | 2000-03-28 | 2000-02-28 | 2000-01-28 | 1999-12-28

Key: Value:

Key: Value:

MESSAGE
DATE 2016-09-30
FROM Rick Moen
SUBJECT Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Hey, Ruben! Plastic bag initiatives!
tl;dr: I have analyses posted on the Web of the June and November
ballots at my address in California that may interest even
right-coasters. URLs below. November one covers the last gasp of the
plastic bag industry to overturn California law, about to go down in
smoke. Ruben is invited to be annoyed. ;->



Ruben won't be seeing this thread until after Shabbos, but we feckless
goyim (and people in further-west time zones) can palaver in his
absence.

Last May, Ruben was having a cow (subspecies virtual) over a minuscule
tax on single-use plastic shopping bags then being debated in NYC and
Albany. How'd that turn out, by the way?

At the time, I mentioned part of our experience in California. All
around the cities and counties of San Francisco Bay Area starting in
2007, and in a number of other cities in other parts of the state (151
cities total) there's been for _quite_ a few years the same sort of bag
ordinance. You no longer get paper _or_ plastic grocery & pharmacy bags
'free' [sic]. Either paper or _thick_ (multi-use) bags remain available
if you need them at (typically) 10-25 cents each. You are encouraged to
either reuse, or (better) just bring from home the now-ubiquitous canvas
bags or other bags you already have.

And this ordinance has been a roaring success everywhere it's been
enacted. Just about all the blowing plastic-bag litter: Pfft. Gone.
(The percent remaining will be in part leftover from pre-ordinance
days and part litter brought in fron non-ordinance jurisdictions.)
And the people who were shouting persecution pretty much all found the
new arrangement really easy to deal with, and NOT ONE of the 151 cities
or dozen-odd counties has repealed its ordinance. Zero. Pretty nearly
everyone prefers things this way. Polls continue to show heavy public
support, even in the parts of California with no local bag law.

Except, of course, from the plastic bag industry, which _really_ got
into the game after Governor Brown signed into law SB-270, a _statewide_
bag statute imposing a minimum 10 cent fee for throwaway paper or
plastic grocery & pharmacy bags. They've so far thrown at least $5M
into getting SB-270 overturned, _and_ succeeded in both getting SB-270
held up pending a voter referendum (Proposition 67) and also threw onto
the ballot a second 'trojan horse' bag measure (Proposition 65) to muddy
the waters, sabotage the statewide ban if it passes, and with luck annoy
voters into voting 'no' on both measures -- an old trick.

http://sandiegofreepress.org/2016/09/the-battle-against-plastic-bags-in-california-a-brief-history/

Polls are so far showing that California voters are _not_ being fooled,
though the day is young and we'll know for certain only on Nov. 8th.
But _even if_ the plastic bag industry is able to buy enough statewide
influence, they'll still have the huge problem of those 151 successful,
popular city ordinances and dozen-odd county ones.

And, oh, the California Republican Party endorses the plastic industry's
'trojan horse' decoy proposition. (In fairness, they don't oppose the
good one.)



Anyway: These last two election cycles (June and November 2016),
I've expanded slightly something I've always done for my family and
close friends: ballot analysis.

For years, I've written an e-mail prior to each major election, listing
all the ballot issues and candidates, and saying in a separate, marked
section for each issue/candidate, how I'm voting and why. These have
been very popular, in part because there's no goddamned polemics in it.

Many people including Our Good Host seem to fail to realise that there's
an _art_ to the writing and publishing of rants. If you get it wrong,
all you accomplish is to annoy and get ignored if not killfiled, thrown
off mailing lists where you've gone bezerk, etc.

Unless you're Seth Meyers, Samantha Bee, John Oliver, or Bill Maher,
your political rant is going to just make you look stupid and rude, the
more so if you _push_ it at people, e.g., at subscribers of a mailing list.
Such things are so widely understood to be noxious that even polite
recommendations that you _don't_ push at people must be written
carefully.

I _think_ I've been pulling that off. Judge for yourself:

http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/election-2016-06-07.html
http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/election-2016-11-08.html


You in the Empire State might find some of that good reading even if you
have no real interest in the Left Coast, if only because the crazy
stuff Golden State voters try out often knocks on your own door
a couple of years later.

Y'all might find the Top-Top Primary bit interesting, in particular.
It's one of two recent reforms (along with an independent redistricting
commission) that have pretty much ended partisan gridlock in Sacramento.
You might want to give it a try.

And feel free to laugh at California throwing _seventeen_ ballot
proposition at voters on the November 8th ballot. I sure do.




Quoting Rick Moen (rick-at-linuxmafia.com):

> Quoting Ruben Safir (mrbrklyn-at-panix.com):
>
> > On 09/06/2016 09:02 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> > > has anyone followed the imprisonment and months long interment in
> > > Solitary Confinement of Francis Rawls, of Philadelphia? He is accused
> > > of watching child pornography and they are holding him in contempt of
> > > court because his systems are locked with cryptography.
>
> ^^^^
> Are you forwarding mail from your evil twin Ruben Safir?
>
> You did not bother to provide the news article, just the full text of an
> advocacy blog post. The interesting legal question is: What evidence
> did prosecutors provide to the judge to support application of the
> 'foregone conclusion' doctrine's exception to the Fifth Amendment?
>
> Without understanding the legal issue, your covering this matter is
> pretty fruitless. If you agitate about legal issues without bothering
> to understand the law, you are just making noise.
>
>
> NY Times article says on that point, 'Parts of the court documents that
> would explain the reasons for Mr. Rawls’s detention and the court order
> are still under seal.' So, we presently do not know.
>
> The doctrine was developed by the USSC in 1976 in the case Fisher v.
> United States, 425 U.S. 391, 411 and reaffirmed in United States v.
> Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27 (2000). The Fifth Amendment privilege against
> 'self-incrimination' has always been ruled to extend only to
> 'incriminating communitcations... that are testimonial in nature' (US v.
> Hubbell).
>
> Fisher was an IRS case in which defendant Fisher refused to produce
> documents sought by IRS, citing Fifth Amendment privilege. The USSC
> disagreed, ruling that "the act of producing [the papers]—the only thing
> which the taxpayer is compelled to dowould not itself involve
> testimonial self-incrimination." The Court held that the government
> can compel production when the "existence and location [of documents]
> are a foregone conclusion and [the defendant] adds little or nothing to
> the sum total of the Government’s information by conceding that he in
> fact has the papers." Thus, the act of producing papers wasn't
> testimonial; it was not functionally equivalent to admitting-guilt words
> from Fisher's mouth.
>
> By contrast, the USSC disagreed with prosecution in the Hubbell case,
> where a grand jury had subpoenaed documents from an official who refused
> to comply. Here, the Court found that the prosecution had _lacked_
> a priori knowledge of the subpoenaed documents, and thus compelling the
> papers would have constituted a testimonial act.
>
> Lower courts have tended to follow dicta in the Hubbell case and
> requiring the state seeking compulsion under the 'foregone conclusion'
> doctrine to be able to show the court independent, convincing evidence
> of the 'existence, custody, and authenticity' of the material sought --
> all three of those elements, not just police handwavium.
>
> Moveover, because of subsequent cases, in three District Courts (DC
> Circuit, Ninth Circuit, Eleventh Circuit), prosecution must also have
> existing knowledge of the subpoenaed documents with "reasonable
> particularity" before "the communication inherent in the act of
> production can be considered a foregone conclusion." (Philadelphia's
> served by the Third Circuit.)
>
> _So_, the implication in the Rawls case is that the judge has seen other
> evidence (so far under seal) that already convinced him/her past a
> reasonable doubt that the hard drives' contents are child pornography,
> which is why he ruled that decrypting them isn't a testimonial act, and
> refusing his order to do so is contempt of court. Rawls's public
> defender's job was to convince the judge that whatever-that-was _didn't_
> establish the 'existence, custody, and authenticity' of kiddie porn on
> Rawls's hard drives -- but on the evidence he didn't succeed.
>
>
> Now, you can dislike the court's holding if you like, but at least you
> understand it better.
>
>
> And, next time, don't try to understand legal issues by reading advocacy
> blog postings.
>
_______________________________________________
hangout mailing list
hangout-at-nylxs.com
http://www.nylxs.com/

  1. 2016-09-01 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Duck Duck Go is offially Dead
  2. 2016-09-01 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Welcome Home Party
  3. 2016-09-01 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] ssh puzzle
  4. 2016-09-01 Ruben Safir <ruben.safir-at-my.liu.edu> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] ssh puzzle
  5. 2016-09-01 Ruben Safir <ruben.safir-at-my.liu.edu> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: LIU CS course
  6. 2016-09-02 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Duck Duck Go is offially Dead
  7. 2016-09-02 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: Linux Journal Weekly News - September 2, 2016
  8. 2016-09-02 From: =?utf-8?Q?MIT=20Digital=20Learning?= <MITxonedX-at-mit.edu> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] =?utf-8?q?Join_our_interactive_course_on_designin?=
  9. 2016-09-04 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] sad iran payoffs
  10. 2016-09-04 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] LIU Lockout
  11. 2016-09-04 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] egret of akko
  12. 2016-09-06 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] [dmarti-at-zgp.org: [linux-elitists] The un-tracking
  13. 2016-09-06 ruben <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] strange but true
  14. 2016-09-06 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] egret of akko
  15. 2016-09-06 eNotice <enotice-at-ieee.org> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] 2016 IEEE MIT Undergraduate Research Technology
  16. 2016-09-06 ruben safir <ruben.safir-at-my.liu.edu> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Java Applet dead letter
  17. 2016-09-06 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] All-Writ, the FBI and contempt of court
  18. 2016-09-06 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] All-Writ, the FBI and contempt of court
  19. 2016-09-06 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] All-Writ, the FBI and contempt of court
  20. 2016-09-07 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] All-Writ, the FBI and contempt of court
  21. 2016-09-07 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] All-Writ, the FBI and contempt of court
  22. 2016-09-07 mrbrklyn <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: 2016 IEEE MIT Undergraduate Research
  23. 2016-09-07 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] All-Writ, the FBI and contempt of court
  24. 2016-09-04 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] LIU Brooklyn Student Update
  25. 2016-09-04 Ruben Safir <ruben.safir-at-my.liu.edu> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] LIU Brooklyn Student Update
  26. 2016-09-07 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] ( going to meetings anymore ? ) | | new,
  27. 2016-09-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] LIU Brooklyn Lock Out
  28. 2016-09-08 From: "Linux Journal" <noreply-at-lists.linuxjournal.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Linux Journal Weekly News - September 8, 2016
  29. 2016-09-10 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] who needs porgies
  30. 2016-09-10 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: LIU Lock Out
  31. 2016-09-10 Ruben Safir <ruben.safir-at-my.liu.edu> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: LIU Lock Out
  32. 2016-09-07 From: =?utf-8?Q?Middle=20East=20Forum?= <mefnews-at-meforum.org> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] =?utf-8?q?End_San_Francisco_State_University_Part?=
  33. 2016-09-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: End San Francisco State University Partnership
  34. 2016-09-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: [wwwac] Seeking Joomla developer
  35. 2016-09-12 Gabor Szabo <gabor-at-szabgab.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] [Perlweekly] #268 - Awesome Open Source projects
  36. 2016-09-12 Elfen Magix <elfen_magix-at-yahoo.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: [wwwac] Seeking Joomla developer
  37. 2016-09-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] =?utf-8?q?Fwd=3A_=22Academic_Malfeasance=3A_The_C?=
  38. 2016-09-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: [isoc-ny] ISOC-NY joins coalition of groups
  39. 2016-09-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Drinks at K&R tonight
  40. 2016-09-14 ruth02-at-web.de Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Porgies question: WHY ARE THOSE PORGIES NOT !
  41. 2016-09-14 Linux Journal Services <LinuxJournalServices-at-linuxjournalservices.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] All things DevOps: 2016 DevOps and Salary Reports
  42. 2016-09-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: [isoc-ny] PARTNER EVENT: Bridging the Digital
  43. 2016-09-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: SUSECON Adapt to Win
  44. 2016-09-16 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Take a Selfie
  45. 2016-09-19 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] T-rex Scans
  46. 2016-09-19 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Porgies question: WHY ARE THOSE PORGIES NOT !
  47. 2016-09-20 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Open Science
  48. 2016-09-20 James E Keenan <jkeen-at-verizon.net> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] ny.pm September social meeting: Mon Sep 26
  49. 2016-09-20 From: "Mancini, Sabin (DFS)" <Sabin.Mancini-at-dfs.ny.gov> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] ny.pm September social meeting: Mon Sep 26 | |
  50. 2016-09-20 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] ny.pm September social meeting: Mon Sep 26 | |
  51. 2016-09-22 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Cheap Working Laptops available with Linux
  52. 2016-09-22 Ron Guerin <ron-at-vnetworx.net> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Cheap Working Laptops available with Linux
  53. 2016-09-22 Ruben Safir <ruben.safir-at-my.liu.edu> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Cheap Working Laptops available with Linux
  54. 2016-09-22 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Cheap Working Laptops available with Linux
  55. 2016-09-22 Ron Guerin <ron-at-vnetworx.net> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Cheap Working Laptops available with Linux
  56. 2016-09-23 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Cheap Working Laptops available with Linux
  57. 2016-09-23 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society <noreply-at-embs.org> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] DEADLINE Approaching: IEEE International Conference
  58. 2016-09-26 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] 3d dinosaur scans
  59. 2016-09-26 Gabor Szabo <gabor-at-szabgab.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] [Perlweekly] #270 - Hackathons are like buses ...
  60. 2016-09-26 Gabor Szabo <gabor-at-szabgab.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] [Perlweekly] #270 - Hackathons are like buses ...
  61. 2016-09-28 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: [nylug-talk] RSVP open: Wed Oct 5,
  62. 2016-09-28 From: "Ruben.Safir" <ruben.safir-at-my.liu.edu> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: Invitation to Submit Honorary Degree
  63. 2016-09-28 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Friday - what are you doing?
  64. 2016-09-28 Ruben Safir <ruben.safir-at-my.liu.edu> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: [Learn] Notice: Learn Mailing List for LIU
  65. 2016-09-28 Jon Tennant <jon.tennant.2-at-gmail.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] phylogenetics
  66. 2016-09-30 Ruben Safir <ruben.safir-at-my.liu.edu> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Fwd: News from Hackster.io
  67. 2016-09-30 Michael Schout <mschout-at-gkg.net> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] [RELEASE CANDIDATE] mod_perl-2.0.10 RC1
  68. 2016-09-30 Steve Hay <stevehay-at-apache.org> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] [RELEASE CANDIDATE] mod_perl-2.0.10 RC1
  69. 2016-09-30 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] [manjaro-dev] Removal of CLI and Thus installer
  70. 2016-09-30 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] Hey, Ruben! Plastic bag initiatives!
  71. 2016-09-30 From: "buyertech-at-abebooks.com" <buyertech-at-abebooks.com> Subject: [Hangout-NYLXS] ABE Response ARN -54814837
  72. 2016-09-30 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] ABE Response ARN -54814837
  73. 2016-09-30 Rick Moen <rick-at-linuxmafia.com> Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] Hey, Ruben! Plastic bag initiatives!

NYLXS are Do'ers and the first step of Doing is Joining! Join NYLXS and make a difference in your community today!