Sun Jul 21 22:53:08 2024
EVENTS
 FREE
SOFTWARE
INSTITUTE

POLITICS
JOBS
MEMBERS'
CORNER

MAILING
LIST

NYLXS Mailing Lists and Archives
NYLXS Members have a lot to say and share but we don't keep many secrets. Join the Hangout Mailing List and say your peice.

DATE 2005-01-01

HANGOUT

2024-07-21 | 2024-06-21 | 2024-05-21 | 2024-04-21 | 2024-03-21 | 2024-02-21 | 2024-01-21 | 2023-12-21 | 2023-11-21 | 2023-10-21 | 2023-09-21 | 2023-08-21 | 2023-07-21 | 2023-06-21 | 2023-05-21 | 2023-04-21 | 2023-03-21 | 2023-02-21 | 2023-01-21 | 2022-12-21 | 2022-11-21 | 2022-10-21 | 2022-09-21 | 2022-08-21 | 2022-07-21 | 2022-06-21 | 2022-05-21 | 2022-04-21 | 2022-03-21 | 2022-02-21 | 2022-01-21 | 2021-12-21 | 2021-11-21 | 2021-10-21 | 2021-09-21 | 2021-08-21 | 2021-07-21 | 2021-06-21 | 2021-05-21 | 2021-04-21 | 2021-03-21 | 2021-02-21 | 2021-01-21 | 2020-12-21 | 2020-11-21 | 2020-10-21 | 2020-09-21 | 2020-08-21 | 2020-07-21 | 2020-06-21 | 2020-05-21 | 2020-04-21 | 2020-03-21 | 2020-02-21 | 2020-01-21 | 2019-12-21 | 2019-11-21 | 2019-10-21 | 2019-09-21 | 2019-08-21 | 2019-07-21 | 2019-06-21 | 2019-05-21 | 2019-04-21 | 2019-03-21 | 2019-02-21 | 2019-01-21 | 2018-12-21 | 2018-11-21 | 2018-10-21 | 2018-09-21 | 2018-08-21 | 2018-07-21 | 2018-06-21 | 2018-05-21 | 2018-04-21 | 2018-03-21 | 2018-02-21 | 2018-01-21 | 2017-12-21 | 2017-11-21 | 2017-10-21 | 2017-09-21 | 2017-08-21 | 2017-07-21 | 2017-06-21 | 2017-05-21 | 2017-04-21 | 2017-03-21 | 2017-02-21 | 2017-01-21 | 2016-12-21 | 2016-11-21 | 2016-10-21 | 2016-09-21 | 2016-08-21 | 2016-07-21 | 2016-06-21 | 2016-05-21 | 2016-04-21 | 2016-03-21 | 2016-02-21 | 2016-01-21 | 2015-12-21 | 2015-11-21 | 2015-10-21 | 2015-09-21 | 2015-08-21 | 2015-07-21 | 2015-06-21 | 2015-05-21 | 2015-04-21 | 2015-03-21 | 2015-02-21 | 2015-01-21 | 2014-12-21 | 2014-11-21 | 2014-10-21 | 2014-09-21 | 2014-08-21 | 2014-07-21 | 2014-06-21 | 2014-05-21 | 2014-04-21 | 2014-03-21 | 2014-02-21 | 2014-01-21 | 2013-12-21 | 2013-11-21 | 2013-10-21 | 2013-09-21 | 2013-08-21 | 2013-07-21 | 2013-06-21 | 2013-05-21 | 2013-04-21 | 2013-03-21 | 2013-02-21 | 2013-01-21 | 2012-12-21 | 2012-11-21 | 2012-10-21 | 2012-09-21 | 2012-08-21 | 2012-07-21 | 2012-06-21 | 2012-05-21 | 2012-04-21 | 2012-03-21 | 2012-02-21 | 2012-01-21 | 2011-12-21 | 2011-11-21 | 2011-10-21 | 2011-09-21 | 2011-08-21 | 2011-07-21 | 2011-06-21 | 2011-05-21 | 2011-04-21 | 2011-03-21 | 2011-02-21 | 2011-01-21 | 2010-12-21 | 2010-11-21 | 2010-10-21 | 2010-09-21 | 2010-08-21 | 2010-07-21 | 2010-06-21 | 2010-05-21 | 2010-04-21 | 2010-03-21 | 2010-02-21 | 2010-01-21 | 2009-12-21 | 2009-11-21 | 2009-10-21 | 2009-09-21 | 2009-08-21 | 2009-07-21 | 2009-06-21 | 2009-05-21 | 2009-04-21 | 2009-03-21 | 2009-02-21 | 2009-01-21 | 2008-12-21 | 2008-11-21 | 2008-10-21 | 2008-09-21 | 2008-08-21 | 2008-07-21 | 2008-06-21 | 2008-05-21 | 2008-04-21 | 2008-03-21 | 2008-02-21 | 2008-01-21 | 2007-12-21 | 2007-11-21 | 2007-10-21 | 2007-09-21 | 2007-08-21 | 2007-07-21 | 2007-06-21 | 2007-05-21 | 2007-04-21 | 2007-03-21 | 2007-02-21 | 2007-01-21 | 2006-12-21 | 2006-11-21 | 2006-10-21 | 2006-09-21 | 2006-08-21 | 2006-07-21 | 2006-06-21 | 2006-05-21 | 2006-04-21 | 2006-03-21 | 2006-02-21 | 2006-01-21 | 2005-12-21 | 2005-11-21 | 2005-10-21 | 2005-09-21 | 2005-08-21 | 2005-07-21 | 2005-06-21 | 2005-05-21 | 2005-04-21 | 2005-03-21 | 2005-02-21 | 2005-01-21 | 2004-12-21 | 2004-11-21 | 2004-10-21 | 2004-09-21 | 2004-08-21 | 2004-07-21 | 2004-06-21 | 2004-05-21 | 2004-04-21 | 2004-03-21 | 2004-02-21 | 2004-01-21 | 2003-12-21 | 2003-11-21 | 2003-10-21 | 2003-09-21 | 2003-08-21 | 2003-07-21 | 2003-06-21 | 2003-05-21 | 2003-04-21 | 2003-03-21 | 2003-02-21 | 2003-01-21 | 2002-12-21 | 2002-11-21 | 2002-10-21 | 2002-09-21 | 2002-08-21 | 2002-07-21 | 2002-06-21 | 2002-05-21 | 2002-04-21 | 2002-03-21 | 2002-02-21 | 2002-01-21 | 2001-12-21 | 2001-11-21 | 2001-10-21 | 2001-09-21 | 2001-08-21 | 2001-07-21 | 2001-06-21 | 2001-05-21 | 2001-04-21 | 2001-03-21 | 2001-02-21 | 2001-01-21 | 2000-12-21 | 2000-11-21 | 2000-10-21 | 2000-09-21 | 2000-08-21 | 2000-07-21 | 2000-06-21 | 2000-05-21 | 2000-04-21 | 2000-03-21 | 2000-02-21 | 2000-01-21 | 1999-12-21

Key: Value:

Key: Value:

MESSAGE
DATE 2005-01-16
FROM Ruben Safir
SUBJECT Subject: [hangout] Lotus 1-2-3 Free Software

At the heart of the open-source revolution


By Paul Festa
http://news.com.com/At+the+heart+of+the+open-source+revolution/2008-7344_3-5519612.html

Story last modified Thu Jan 13 04:00:00 PST 2005




"As an entrepreneur many times over, he hopes he's really getting it
right this time." So states half of Mitch Kapor's terse biography on the
Open Source Applications Foundation staff page.

It's an odd statement, considering that Kapor got it so spectacularly
right the first time. In 1982, he co-founded Lotus Development, later
acquired by IBM, and co-wrote the Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet application
commonly credited with spurring the personal computer's conquest of the
business world.

Although his latest effort is unfolding in comparative obscurity, many
in the open-source world are hoping, along with Kapor, that he gets this
one right and that the results once again rearrange the dynamics of the
computer industry.

Having made his fortune during the heyday of proprietary software, the
54-year-old Kapor finds himself at the forefront of two foundations
devoted to open-source software development. He is both president and
chair of the OSAF and chairman of the Mozilla Foundation, the group
founded by Netscape Communications to develop its browser and later spun
off by Netscape acquirer AOL Time Warner.

The goal of the foundations isn't to create a new killer app but rather
to use the open-source development model to dislodge Microsoft's
Web-browsing and e-mail software titles from their dominant market
positions.

Kapor spoke to CNET News.com about his open-source and charity
foundations, what it will take to challenge Microsoft and the movement
behind Mozilla.

Q: Let's start with the basics: Why open source?
A: Open source is important to different groups of people for different
reasons. For consumers, it's one thing; for developers, it's another.
But basically, it's an entirely different way of organizing the
large-scale economic activity of creating and distributing software
(and) has many advantages. It's not a cure-all.

I think that for people who use software, in the long run, open-source
products are going to be less expensive and of higher quality. Also,
open-source products put more control into the hands of people and
organizations that use the software, which is a good thing.

What did your experience at Lotus contribute to your philosophy today?
One of the big events that changed open source a lot took place after I
left Lotus in the late 1980s. That's when Linux started and, in
particular, that's when other licensing models besides the pure GPL
(General Public License) started to be more widely used. Open-source
products started to move into the larger world of business software. And
that wasn't even on the horizon when I was at Lotus.

By the time it got to the very late '90s, it was clear that it had
become difficult to innovate successfully using the

(Firefox) represents proof that a well-done, well-wrought open-source
product can have global impact.
proprietary model if you wanted to develop everyday applications that
anyone with a personal computer would use: e-mail, spreadsheets, word
processors. (Open source) became an end-run around the stagnation that I
saw going on. It was very frustrating for lots of people in that the
existing products that were out there simply weren't up to the task of
handling their e-mail and keeping their lives organized.

Is that still the case?
It is. The great thing that's happened of late is to see the early, huge
momentum of Firefox, attracting millions of users and beginning to grow
its market share appreciably. That represents proof that a well-done,
well-wrought open-source product can have global impact as an
application--and I consider a Web browser to be one of those everyday
products.

Is Firefox ultimately going to fizzle?
Nobody knows what's going to happen. It's certainly not inevitable that
Firefox's market share will continue to increase. I think open-source
advocates would do well to be relatively cautious and avoid making
claims and predictions. On the other hand, there are some fundamentals
that favor Firefox. It's a great product, small, fast and more secure.
You don't see anybody disputing that. The next question is how much
mileage there is to get out of it, ultimately. Certainly, it has already
caused Microsoft to improve IE.

Why is that? Why should it take something like Firefox to improve IE?
Microsoft does not respond and improve products otherwise. The Mozilla
Foundation does not have financial goals, so it can take credit for
whatever improvements happen in the browser, whether they're in Firefox
or not. By the standards of the project itself, to the extent that the
net result is that IE's fundamental security problems get addressed,
that, too, is a victory. As for the analysts who look at this, I doubt
that's their criteria for success.

To the extent that the net result is that IE's fundamental security
problems get addressed, that, too, is a victory.

The other thing is that enterprises are not, in many cases, very
satisfied with a single Microsoft alternative. This is a known and
longstanding problem. They have been held back by a lack of alternatives
that are comparable and satisfying in all the ways important to
enterprises.

With Firefox, which begins to pass the threshold for enterprise
acceptance, the question is, How will they respond? It's not a question
of the economics of it, but will it help them to manage their computing
infrastructure better? As for whether Firefox is overhyped, we'll have
to see how this plays out.

What exactly is your role at the Mozilla Foundation?
I am the board chair. It's like being on the board of any for-profit or
nonprofit--I'm not at all involved in day-to-day operations but rather
with overall governance and consulting on strategic directions. So I
meet regularly with (Mozilla Foundation president) Mitchell Baker.

I've been covering Mozilla almost since the beginning, I've spoken with
Mitchell Baker many times, and I've still never gotten a good sense of
her.
I have to say that I have often found that people underestimate her. I
know that when the project was inside Netscape/AOL, she did not receive
the regard from the AOL executives that I thought was really due to her.
Mozilla is a really interesting and complex project and organization.

I think it was like the Harry Potter of open source. You know how all
the movies open with him living with his aunt and uncle, who give him no
respect and lock him up? People had written off Mozilla on multiple
occasions. I felt like and continue to feel like she does a remarkable
job in a low-key way in shepherding that project through unique and
difficult circumstances. I think the renaissance with Firefox and
Thunderbird--without her this would not have happened.

Mozilla was like the Harry Potter of open source.
I respect her leadership, which is very low-key and not charismatic--the
opposite of the Larry Ellison style. She has been effective in the face
of real challenges. I got involved at the point when we extracted it
from AOL.

How did that come about, anyway?
There was a recognition that it didn't make sense for that project to be
inside AOL, but it was sort of stuck in the birth canal. It turned out
that I was able to act as an intermediary or midwife because I know
Mitchell, who has worked at the Open Source Applications Foundation, and
I also know the vice chairman of AOL, Ted Leonsis, who, at the time, was
running the AOL service. And he was one of the top handful of executives
at the whole thing. I ran into him at a conference, and we got to
talking, and I was able to make this thing happen. And we brokered an
arrangement to spin Mozilla out into its own nonprofit. So that was a
year and a half ago.

You also have two of your own foundations.
Oh, at least. I'm almost entirely working on the nonprofit side. There's
the Open Source Applications Foundation and the Mitchell Kapor
Foundation. Then there's also the Level Playing Field Institute.

Let me ask you about what's going on at the Open Source Applications
Foundation. What are you doing with Chandler?
Chandler is a personal information manager whose principle functions are
e-mail and calendar. It also has some contact, address and task
management.

One of the goals for Chandler all along has been to start with more of a
clean sheet of paper in how we design the application. The other
alternative is to do something more conventional that looks and works
more or less like Outlook. There's nothing wrong with that, but as I was
saying before, one of the goals is to see if we could innovate to
improve the user experience in fundamental ways. We will either fail or
succeed in how well we do with that goal.

Apart from writing this thing from the ground up, what are your larger
strategic goals for Chandler?
In the same way that Firefox has established itself as very viable
open-source browser alternative, one strategic goal would be to
establish another alternative in another important software applications
category--a viable open-source alternative that has the potential, as it
matures, to reach ultimately millions of people and a developer
community of thousands. Those are goals which we will get to in several
stages, not all at once.

In terms of the e-mail and the calendar components, Chandler sounds a
lot like what Mozilla is already doing with Thunderbird and Sunbird.
Aren't your open-source foundations stepping on each other's toes?
It's absolutely in the same category as Thunderbird. Sunbird is an
existing community calendar, which is basic and not complete or robust.
They're using that as a base, adding a lot of things to it and
integrating that with Thunderbird.

The aspiration level of Sunbird, by everyone's account, is significantly
more modest and different than what we're trying to do in Chandler.
We're trying to provide a well-engineered, well-designed but vanilla
IMAP client and some vanilla calendaring. But when I was talking about
overcoming information silos and better integration between the
different kinds of data that a PIM manages--that's a Chandler
aspiration. In Outlook, your data is in separate silos when often you'd
like to see things much better connected.

The Mitchell Kapor Foundation and the Level Playing Field Initiative are
both concerned with social, environmental and educational issues. When
it comes to those issues, how would you rate the high-tech industry as a
whole?
It's pretty mixed. It's difficult and dangerous to make enormous
generalizations. You'll find a number of progressive corporations that
stand up for social responsibility, and tech companies are not like
mining or these extractive industries that are wreaking enormous
environmental damage.

At the same time, I'd say there's still a kind of Silicon Valley
attitude that doesn't take its corporate responsibilities seriously.
They say, "We help people get rich, and they should decide in their
private lives what kind of philanthropy to support." That's
irresponsible.

If you're running a business, you have employees, and that comes with
very basic responsibilities to be a good citizen. That's not a
mainstream attitude in the technology industry.


Copyright ©1995-2005 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.



____________________________
NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
Fair Use -
because it's either fair use or useless....
NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc

  1. 2005-01-31 From: "Martin, Jared" <JMartin-at-dglaw.com> Fw: [hangout] [visham-at-proexam.org: I will like to Register/And I will also like to lern more about this class]
  2. 2005-01-30 From: "P.Robert Marino" <rob-at-concord-hs.org> Re: [hangout] Re: Paid DOE Security Deployment Internship Job Description
  3. 2005-01-30 From: "rc" <ray-pub-at-rcn.com> Subject: [hangout] classes
  4. 2005-01-30 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [hangout] We should Celebrate!
  5. 2005-01-30 From: "Steve Milo" <slavik914-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [hangout] Tax that funded the Spano-American war could be extended
  6. 2005-01-30 From: "Steve Milo" <slavik914-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [hangout] January 30, Sunday, Kings Games. Is anybody or everybody going to be there?
  7. 2005-01-30 swd <sderrick-at-optonline.net> Subject: [hangout] January 30, Sunday, Kings Games. Is anybody or everybody going to be
  8. 2005-01-30 From: "Steve Milo" <slavik914-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [hangout] Future might be looking brighter
  9. 2005-01-30 Ron Guerin <ron-at-vnetworx.net> Re: [hangout] Future might be looking brighter
  10. 2005-01-29 From: "Steve Milo" <slavik914-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [hangout] Future might be looking brighter
  11. 2005-01-29 Billy <billy-at-dadadada.net> Re: Fw: [hangout] [visham-at-proexam.org: I will like to Register/And
  12. 2005-01-29 Billy <billy-at-dadadada.net> Re: [hangout] Re: Paid DOE Security Deployment Internship Job Description
  13. 2005-01-28 From: "Martin, Jared" <JMartin-at-dglaw.com> Fw: [hangout] [visham-at-proexam.org: I will like to Register/And I will also like to lern more about this class]
  14. 2005-01-28 Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [hangout] Future might be looking brighter
  15. 2005-01-27 Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [hangout] [visham-at-proexam.org: I will like to Register/And I will also like to lern more about this class]
  16. 2005-01-27 From: "Inker, Evan" <EInker-at-gam.com> Subject: [hangout] MySQL installations targeted by Forbot worm variant
  17. 2005-01-27 From: "Inker, Evan" <EInker-at-gam.com> Subject: [hangout] Concerns mount over Lenovo's IBM deal
  18. 2005-01-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [hangout] New Cold Medication Restrictions will make them Pharmacy only
  19. 2005-01-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [hangout] I've been Robbed - NOT
  20. 2005-01-26 Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [hangout] Simple C question
  21. 2005-01-26 Billy <billy-at-dadadada.net> Re: [hangout] Simple C question
  22. 2005-01-26 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [hangout] Simple C question
  23. 2005-01-26 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [hangout] Simple C question
  24. 2005-01-25 From: "rc" <ray-pub-at-rcn.com> Subject: [hangout] FOSS Biz Solution Thoughts?
  25. 2005-01-25 From: "Martin, Jared" <JMartin-at-dglaw.com> RE: [hangout] Simple C question
  26. 2005-01-25 Steve Milo <slavik914-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [hangout] Simple C question
  27. 2005-01-25 Billy <billy-at-dadadada.net> Re: [hangout] Simple C question
  28. 2005-01-25 Billy <billy-at-dadadada.net> Re: [hangout] Simple C question
  29. 2005-01-25 James Linder <jhl-at-jlinder.com> Re: [hangout] Simple C question
  30. 2005-01-25 From: "Inker, Evan" <EInker-at-gam.com> RE: [hangout] Simple C question
  31. 2005-01-25 From: "Martin, Jared" <JMartin-at-dglaw.com> Subject: [hangout] Simple C question
  32. 2005-01-25 Ron Guerin <ron-at-vnetworx.net> Re: [hangout] Ron G.
  33. 2005-01-25 From: "Inker, Evan" <EInker-at-gam.com> Subject: [hangout] IBM goes silent on Linux desktop effort
  34. 2005-01-25 From: "Steve Milo" <slavik914-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [hangout] Ron G.
  35. 2005-01-25 From: "Inker, Evan" <EInker-at-gam.com> Subject: [hangout] Flame Wars, Forks and Freedom
  36. 2005-01-24 From: "Inker, Evan" <EInker-at-gam.com> Subject: [hangout] VeriSign breaks silence on domain hijack
  37. 2005-01-23 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [hangout] Mama - don't let your kids grow up to be programers
  38. 2005-01-21 From: "Steve Milo" <slavik914-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [hangout] Paging serge.
  39. 2005-01-20 From: "Inker, Evan" <EInker-at-gam.com> Subject: [hangout] A Take on the Workstation Market Today
  40. 2005-01-20 From: "Inker, Evan" <EInker-at-gam.com> Subject: [hangout] OS News of the Day - Jan 20, 2005
  41. 2005-01-20 From: "Steve Milo" <slavik914-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [hangout] FIX Protocol
  42. 2005-01-20 From: "Steve Milo" <slavik914-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [hangout] FIX Protocol
  43. 2005-01-20 From: "Inker, Evan" <EInker-at-gam.com> RE: [hangout] NY Linux Users Grp. 27 Jan. Meeting: Elliotte Rusty
  44. 2005-01-20 From: "Steve Milo" <slavik914-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [hangout] NY Linux Users Grp. 27 Jan. Meeting: Elliotte Rusty Harold -on- Extensible Markup Language (XML)
  45. 2005-01-20 Ron Guerin <ron-at-vnetworx.net> Subject: [hangout] NY Linux Users Grp. 27 Jan. Meeting: Elliotte Rusty Harold -on-
  46. 2005-01-20 swd <sderrick-at-optonline.net> RE: [hangout] FIX Protocol
  47. 2005-01-19 From: "Inker, Evan" <EInker-at-gam.com> RE: [hangout] Staff Development and Organizational Capacity
  48. 2005-01-19 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> RE: [hangout] Staff Development and Organizational Capacity
  49. 2005-01-18 From: "Martin, Jared" <JMartin-at-dglaw.com> RE: [hangout] Staff Development and Organizational Capacity
  50. 2005-01-16 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [hangout] Lotus 1-2-3 Free Software
  51. 2005-01-14 From: "Inker, Evan" <EInker-at-gam.com> Subject: [hangout] FBI may scrap $170 million project
  52. 2005-01-13 From: "Inker, Evan" <EInker-at-gam.com> Subject: [hangout] Linux misperceptions the greatest challenge: Novell
  53. 2005-01-13 From: "Inker, Evan" <EInker-at-gam.com> Subject: [hangout] Red Hat, SuSE release Linux patches
  54. 2005-01-13 From: "Inker, Evan" <EInker-at-gam.com> Subject: [hangout] Red Hat tries again with Linux enthusiasts
  55. 2005-01-13 From: "Inker, Evan" <EInker-at-gam.com> Subject: [hangout] Big Brother Bloomberg is watching.
  56. 2005-01-13 From: "Steve Milo" <slavik914-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [hangout] Paging Serge.
  57. 2005-01-13 Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [hangout] More wonderful BS from Columbia University
  58. 2005-01-13 Billy <billy-at-dadadada.net> Re: [hangout] Why is he still able to teach!!!
  59. 2005-01-13 Billy <billy-at-dadadada.net> Re: [hangout] More wonderful BS from Columbia University
  60. 2005-01-13 Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [hangout] More wonderful BS from Columbia University
  61. 2005-01-12 Billy <billy-at-dadadada.net> Re: [hangout] More wonderful BS from Columbia University
  62. 2005-01-12 dspira-at-att.net Subject: [hangout] Why is he still able to teach!!!
  63. 2005-01-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [hangout] More wonderful BS from Columbia University
  64. 2005-01-12 From: "Inker, Evan" <EInker-at-gam.com> RE: [hangout] More wonderful BS from Columbia University
  65. 2005-01-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [hangout] Open Office and Web Publishing
  66. 2005-01-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [hangout] Bird Watching
  67. 2005-01-12 From: "Inker, Evan" <EInker-at-gam.com> Subject: [hangout] GNOME Journal, January 2005 Edition
  68. 2005-01-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [hangout] IBM - Software Patents
  69. 2005-01-11 From: "Inker, Evan" <EInker-at-gam.com> Subject: [hangout] NYLXS Needs You !! Call Out for Volunteers
  70. 2005-01-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [hangout] Staff Development and Organizational Capacity
  71. 2005-01-11 From: "Inker, Evan" <EInker-at-gam.com> RE: [hangout] Staff Development and Organizational Capacity
  72. 2005-01-11 From: "Inker, Evan" <EInker-at-gam.com> Subject: [hangout] Staff Development and Organizational Capacity
  73. 2005-01-11 wjc <wjc-at-optonline.net> Subject: [hangout] test
  74. 2005-01-09 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [hangout] It never ends......
  75. 2005-01-06 Billy <billy-at-dadadada.net> Re: [hangout] What is available for creating GUI's?
  76. 2005-01-06 From: "P.Robert Marino" <rob-at-concord-hs.org> Subject: [hangout] the contract number for the microsoft contract with the NYC DOE
  77. 2005-01-06 From: "Steve Milo" <slavik914-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [hangout] What is available for creating GUI's?

NYLXS are Do'ers and the first step of Doing is Joining! Join NYLXS and make a difference in your community today!