MESSAGE
| DATE | 2010-02-25 |
| FROM | Ruben Safir
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] this should not get through
|
From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Thu Feb 25 22:59:24 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com Received: by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) id 3219737BD5; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:59:24 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: hangout-outgoing-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com Received: by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28) id 2112B49C05; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:59:24 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9C037BD5 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:59:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from panix1.panix.com (panix1.panix.com [166.84.1.1]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40861F099 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:59:30 -0500 (EST) Received: by panix1.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 20529) id A917414B98; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:59:30 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:59:30 -0500 From: Ruben Safir To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] this should not get through Message-ID: <20100226035929.GA22683-at-panix.com> References: <20100224055246.GA1602-at-panix.com> <199792.78675.qm-at-web38008.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20100225044004.GA15620-at-panix.com> <4B8688E8.8010602-at-vnetworx.net> <20100225152032.GA10545-at-panix.com> <4B86A203.9020401-at-vnetworx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B86A203.9020401-at-vnetworx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:14:59AM -0500, Ron Guerin wrote: > Ruben Safir wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 09:27:52AM -0500, Ron Guerin wrote: > > > >> Ruben Safir wrote: > >> > >>> So I noticed. Majordomo seems to parse on the From: header instead of > >>> the From header. > >>> > >>> > >> That's because there isn't a "From " header, that's a convention of > >> mbox, which wouldn't be there if you were using something else like Maildir. > >> > >> - Ron > >> > > > > > > With all due respect, that isn't true. > > > > With all due respect, it *is* true. > > For example: > > > > > > >From conspire-bounces-at-linuxmafia.com Mon Feb 8 22:48:48 2010 > > > > That is _not_ a mail header. That's an mbox device.
Care to elabetrate. As far as I know that is the header and was stated as so in the mbox format.
Ruben
> > - Ron
|
|