|FROM ||Kevin Mark
|SUBJECT ||Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] trying to save NYLUG
|From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Wed Mar 14 07:50:07 2012
Received: by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix)
id 78B16100BEC; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:50:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28)
id 60F9E100BFC; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:50:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nm9-vm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm9-vm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [18.104.22.168])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C7C65100BEC
for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:50:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [22.214.171.124] by nm9.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2012 11:45:46 -0000
Received: from [126.96.36.199] by tm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2012 11:45:46 -0000
Received: from [188.8.131.52] by t4.bullet.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2012 11:45:46 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1001.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2012 11:45:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 27429 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2012 11:45:46 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1331725546; bh=z2CK10sCM/22weDnqU0knQ778srtqab4UCCFIAI7vp0=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent; b=dS5oPTjgoB79H5SfQRmKTrO/ul4O+OR60lgMCqH43FHofXkHIXpV8s7XTug6GkgDZIGoKyg2SRQq7B/+ufnW1dhhoN/HmMyDoMuOskPEBTlKBfiPtVWkhyyaaTgbtmnSyO/hbKydAx5hvG07alF0MgXPXXabBzBiR1ApwZBO3Mw=
Received: from horacrux (kevin.mark-at-184.108.40.206 with plain)
by smtp103.vzn.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Mar 2012 04:45:46 -0700 PDT
Received: from kevin by horacrux with local (Exim 4.76)
id 1S7meH-0003NP-Kk; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:45:45 -0400
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:45:45 -0400
From: Kevin Mark
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] trying to save NYLUG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:43:11PM -0400, Ron Guerin wrote:
> Kevin Mark wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:33:22PM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:
> >> Read this. This is why I was putting in the effort.
> > so sunny say that he has done TONS for NYLUG unlike ron?
> > where sunny says that ron went against NYLUG members by having a meeting at (evil) M$, but that no one objected?
> > or that how sunny said that ron objected to using meetup (but ron didnt)?
> > what is your point?
> I'll also remind everyone to whatever extent it was on life support
> through that time, Sunny did nothing about it. And he's done virtually
> nothing at all since he came back until he and the others had to scurry
> around being seen to be involved because they had daylight shining on
> their misdeeds.
> So if his argument his the coup was justified because NYLUG was
> dysfunctional, he and his fellow junta members have largely themselves
> to blame for their lack of participation. They are the last people that
> deserve to be on any board that runs NYLUG. They took NYLUG from the
> participant volunteers and gave it to themselves. I realize it makes
> people uncomfortable to acknowledge the truth behind the people who
> seized NYLUG and their motives, but surely no one expected any different
> from me. I've always stood up for the truth in these situations, as
> anyone around here who remembers NY Fair Use ought to know.
> - Ron
If the people had called their group NYFLOSSUG, which of the current actions
would be objectionable?
The choice to incorporate
the board selection
the use of meetup
the meeting format
| .''`. == Debian GNU/Linux ==.| http://kevix.myopenid.com......|
| : :' : The Universal OS....| mysite.verizon.net/kevin.mark/.|
| `. `' http://www.debian.org/.| http://counter.li.org [#238656]|
|___`-____Unless I ask to be CCd,.assume I am subscribed._________|
How many weeks are there in a light year?