Mon May 20 09:01:43 2024
EVENTS
 FREE
SOFTWARE
INSTITUTE

POLITICS
JOBS
MEMBERS'
CORNER

MAILING
LIST

NYLXS Mailing Lists and Archives
NYLXS Members have a lot to say and share but we don't keep many secrets. Join the Hangout Mailing List and say your peice.

DATE 2009-02-01

HANGOUT

2024-05-20 | 2024-04-20 | 2024-03-20 | 2024-02-20 | 2024-01-20 | 2023-12-20 | 2023-11-20 | 2023-10-20 | 2023-09-20 | 2023-08-20 | 2023-07-20 | 2023-06-20 | 2023-05-20 | 2023-04-20 | 2023-03-20 | 2023-02-20 | 2023-01-20 | 2022-12-20 | 2022-11-20 | 2022-10-20 | 2022-09-20 | 2022-08-20 | 2022-07-20 | 2022-06-20 | 2022-05-20 | 2022-04-20 | 2022-03-20 | 2022-02-20 | 2022-01-20 | 2021-12-20 | 2021-11-20 | 2021-10-20 | 2021-09-20 | 2021-08-20 | 2021-07-20 | 2021-06-20 | 2021-05-20 | 2021-04-20 | 2021-03-20 | 2021-02-20 | 2021-01-20 | 2020-12-20 | 2020-11-20 | 2020-10-20 | 2020-09-20 | 2020-08-20 | 2020-07-20 | 2020-06-20 | 2020-05-20 | 2020-04-20 | 2020-03-20 | 2020-02-20 | 2020-01-20 | 2019-12-20 | 2019-11-20 | 2019-10-20 | 2019-09-20 | 2019-08-20 | 2019-07-20 | 2019-06-20 | 2019-05-20 | 2019-04-20 | 2019-03-20 | 2019-02-20 | 2019-01-20 | 2018-12-20 | 2018-11-20 | 2018-10-20 | 2018-09-20 | 2018-08-20 | 2018-07-20 | 2018-06-20 | 2018-05-20 | 2018-04-20 | 2018-03-20 | 2018-02-20 | 2018-01-20 | 2017-12-20 | 2017-11-20 | 2017-10-20 | 2017-09-20 | 2017-08-20 | 2017-07-20 | 2017-06-20 | 2017-05-20 | 2017-04-20 | 2017-03-20 | 2017-02-20 | 2017-01-20 | 2016-12-20 | 2016-11-20 | 2016-10-20 | 2016-09-20 | 2016-08-20 | 2016-07-20 | 2016-06-20 | 2016-05-20 | 2016-04-20 | 2016-03-20 | 2016-02-20 | 2016-01-20 | 2015-12-20 | 2015-11-20 | 2015-10-20 | 2015-09-20 | 2015-08-20 | 2015-07-20 | 2015-06-20 | 2015-05-20 | 2015-04-20 | 2015-03-20 | 2015-02-20 | 2015-01-20 | 2014-12-20 | 2014-11-20 | 2014-10-20 | 2014-09-20 | 2014-08-20 | 2014-07-20 | 2014-06-20 | 2014-05-20 | 2014-04-20 | 2014-03-20 | 2014-02-20 | 2014-01-20 | 2013-12-20 | 2013-11-20 | 2013-10-20 | 2013-09-20 | 2013-08-20 | 2013-07-20 | 2013-06-20 | 2013-05-20 | 2013-04-20 | 2013-03-20 | 2013-02-20 | 2013-01-20 | 2012-12-20 | 2012-11-20 | 2012-10-20 | 2012-09-20 | 2012-08-20 | 2012-07-20 | 2012-06-20 | 2012-05-20 | 2012-04-20 | 2012-03-20 | 2012-02-20 | 2012-01-20 | 2011-12-20 | 2011-11-20 | 2011-10-20 | 2011-09-20 | 2011-08-20 | 2011-07-20 | 2011-06-20 | 2011-05-20 | 2011-04-20 | 2011-03-20 | 2011-02-20 | 2011-01-20 | 2010-12-20 | 2010-11-20 | 2010-10-20 | 2010-09-20 | 2010-08-20 | 2010-07-20 | 2010-06-20 | 2010-05-20 | 2010-04-20 | 2010-03-20 | 2010-02-20 | 2010-01-20 | 2009-12-20 | 2009-11-20 | 2009-10-20 | 2009-09-20 | 2009-08-20 | 2009-07-20 | 2009-06-20 | 2009-05-20 | 2009-04-20 | 2009-03-20 | 2009-02-20 | 2009-01-20 | 2008-12-20 | 2008-11-20 | 2008-10-20 | 2008-09-20 | 2008-08-20 | 2008-07-20 | 2008-06-20 | 2008-05-20 | 2008-04-20 | 2008-03-20 | 2008-02-20 | 2008-01-20 | 2007-12-20 | 2007-11-20 | 2007-10-20 | 2007-09-20 | 2007-08-20 | 2007-07-20 | 2007-06-20 | 2007-05-20 | 2007-04-20 | 2007-03-20 | 2007-02-20 | 2007-01-20 | 2006-12-20 | 2006-11-20 | 2006-10-20 | 2006-09-20 | 2006-08-20 | 2006-07-20 | 2006-06-20 | 2006-05-20 | 2006-04-20 | 2006-03-20 | 2006-02-20 | 2006-01-20 | 2005-12-20 | 2005-11-20 | 2005-10-20 | 2005-09-20 | 2005-08-20 | 2005-07-20 | 2005-06-20 | 2005-05-20 | 2005-04-20 | 2005-03-20 | 2005-02-20 | 2005-01-20 | 2004-12-20 | 2004-11-20 | 2004-10-20 | 2004-09-20 | 2004-08-20 | 2004-07-20 | 2004-06-20 | 2004-05-20 | 2004-04-20 | 2004-03-20 | 2004-02-20 | 2004-01-20 | 2003-12-20 | 2003-11-20 | 2003-10-20 | 2003-09-20 | 2003-08-20 | 2003-07-20 | 2003-06-20 | 2003-05-20 | 2003-04-20 | 2003-03-20 | 2003-02-20 | 2003-01-20 | 2002-12-20 | 2002-11-20 | 2002-10-20 | 2002-09-20 | 2002-08-20 | 2002-07-20 | 2002-06-20 | 2002-05-20 | 2002-04-20 | 2002-03-20 | 2002-02-20 | 2002-01-20 | 2001-12-20 | 2001-11-20 | 2001-10-20 | 2001-09-20 | 2001-08-20 | 2001-07-20 | 2001-06-20 | 2001-05-20 | 2001-04-20 | 2001-03-20 | 2001-02-20 | 2001-01-20 | 2000-12-20 | 2000-11-20 | 2000-10-20 | 2000-09-20 | 2000-08-20 | 2000-07-20 | 2000-06-20 | 2000-05-20 | 2000-04-20 | 2000-03-20 | 2000-02-20 | 2000-01-20 | 1999-12-20

Key: Value:

Key: Value:

MESSAGE
DATE 2009-02-15
FROM Michael L Richardson
SUBJECT Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] virus security is finally getting notice
Why the fuss, just get rid of the mother of all virus. Problem solved.

Ruben Safir wrote:
> Microsoft needs to be held responsbile for creating and disemenating
> an insecure OS.
>
> Ruben
> ---------------------
>
> Cyber Security Community Joins Forces to Defeat Conficker Worm
>
> By Brian Krebs
> washingtonpost.com Staff Wrtier
> Friday, February 13, 2009; 3:01 PM
>
> The quarter-million dollar award Microsoft is offering for information
> that leads to the arrest and conviction of those responsibile for
> unleashing the "Conficker" worm may represent the culmination of what
> security experts say has been an unprecedented and collaborative
> response from industry, academia and Internet policy groups aimed at not
> just containing the spread of this worm, but also in creating a playbook
> for dealing with future digital pandemics.
>
> Estimates of how many systems infected by Conficker, a contagion that
> has exploited Microsoft Windows PCs over the past few months, vary
> widely, from 2 million to more than 10 million machines. Microsoft
> estimates that at least 3 million PCs worldwide remain infected. Yet,
> PCs sickened by Conficker have not yet been observed in facilitaing the
> kind of illegal online activities typically spewed by computers infected
> with malicious software, such as sending spam or hosting scam Web sites.
>
> Rather, security experts say the worm may be the first stage of a larger
> attack. By using a mathematical algorithm, Conficker can tell infected
> systems to regularly contact a list of 250 different domain names each
> day. If just one of those domains is registered by the virus writer, it
> could be used to download an as-yet unknown secondary component to all
> infected systems maliciously, such as malicious software.
>
> "This worm would be a marvelous tool in hands of whoever can control it,
> but the real harm from it has yet to be felt, and we're trying to
> postpone that day," said Paul Vixie, founder of Internet Systems
> Consortium, a Redwood City, Calif., company whose open-source software
> powers millions of Internet servers around the globe.
>
> For several weeks after Conficker first surfaced in November, the
> anti-virus community began studying and publishing their research
> online. Individual security researchers were then able to begin
> registering the 250 domains sought daily by Conficker-infected systems
> to ensure those machines would not receive its intended instructions. At
> least one researcher told washingtonpost.com that he registered a number
> of the domains in the names of the FBI and Microsoft.
>
> But, the FBI already was investigating individuals who were found to
> have recently registered domains sought by Conficker-infected systems,
> according to Bill Woodcock, research director of Packet Clearing House,
> a San Francisco based non-profit organization that provides support and
> training to companies that manage critical Internet infrastructure.
>
> "There have been law enforcement folks trying to figure out who the
> holders of these domains are," Woodcock said.
>
> Officials for the FBI did not return calls seeking comment.
>
> Phillip Porras, director of the computer security lab at SRI
> International, also began tracking Conficker domains in late November.
> Porras and his team learned they could determine sets of domains sought
> by Conficker host systems in the past or the future, merely by rolling
> back or forward the system date setting on Microsoft Windows systems
> that they had purposesly infected in their test lab.
>
> As Porras's group began building lists of domains sought by Conficker
> that had already been registered, they found hundreds that traced back
> to security researchers and anti-virus companies that were hoping to
> glean intelligence about the number of systems infected with the worm.
>
> "We found that lots of people had registered these domains to try and
> gather size estimates and to better understand the worm," Porras said.
> "Early on, various folks were sharing this data privately, but nothing
> was really that coordinated."
>
> Yet, as December rolled around and the number of machines infected by
> the worm swelled into the millions, a consensus began to emerge within
> the security research community that they needed a broader coordination
> effort.
>
> That community had only weeks before learned the consequences of
> inaction in the face of another mounting threat. In late November 2008,
> the "Srizbi botnet," a massive collection of compromised Microsoft PCs
> that sent billions of spam e-mails each day, was knocked offline after
> iInternet providers shuttered the Web servers that were being used to
> control and update the botnet's activities.
>
> Researchers knew that Srizbi had a built-in fallback mechanism similar
> to the updating capabilities in Conficker, a failsafe device that could
> resurrect the botnet by forcing infected systems to seek out a randomly
> generated set of four domains that changed every 72 hours.
>
> For several weeks, FireEye, a private security company in Milpitas,
> Calif., took it upon itself to register each of the domains that
> Srizbi-infected systems were told to seek out in order to allow
> criminals to regain control over the wayward systems. But as the costs
> of registering those domains mounted, the company ceased reserving them.
> On Nov. 25, a day after FireEye quit registering the Web site names,
> unknown individuals took over that task, and the Srizbi botnet was back
> online and blasting out spam.
>
> Woodcock said many in the security community, including the Internet
> Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), which oversees the
> domain registration industry, were eager to avoid a repeat of the Srizbi
> fiasco.
>
> "Nobody wanted to go through a big exercise to deal with the Conficker
> worm and not have a process in place to make it easier the next time
> this happens with a different worm," Woodcock said.
>
> Still, coordinating a Conficker counterpunch would require some bending
> of the rules that govern domain name registrations, along with
> unprecedented level of cooperation from foreign governments.
>
> For example, "top level domains" most sought after by Conficker-infested
> systems -- dot-com, dot-org and dot-net -- have explict contracts with
> ICANN that prohibit them from unilaterally reserving Web site names,
> even the seemingly gibberish domains that were known to be sought out by
> Conficker.
>
> Also, some of the domains sought by Conficker would need to be
> registered through registrars controlled by soverign nations that are
> not beholden to ICANN, such as dot-ws (Western Samoa), and dot-cn
> (China).
>
> Rodney Joffe, senior vice president of Sterling, Va., based Neustar
> Inc., which has an exclusive contract with ICANN to manage dot-biz and
> dot-us domain registrations, said ICANN recently took the unprecedented
> step of allowing registrars to set aside any domains sought by Conficker
> systems now or in the future.
>
> Joffe said ICANN was instrumental in waving those restrictions for
> domestic registrars, but also in convincing the Chinese and other
> international registrars to agree to shelve the Conficker domains.
>
> "People blame ICANN when anything having to do with domain names being
> used for abuse comes up," Joffe said. "But this is one of those
> interesting instances where ICANN has been very progressive in the kinds
> of help they've given the registry operators. There seems to be growing,
> global understanding that these kinds of things don't reflect well on
> anyone in the industry and actually cause damage to everyone."
>
> For its part, ICANN will continue to work with the registry community to
> refine its policies on how to deal with future domain name-based
> threats, said Greg Rattray, chief Internet security advisor at ICANN.
>
> "We agreed with the registries that we need to look at how to do this in
> a coordinated, coherent fashion that enables the community to respond in
> accordance with the contractual policy guidelines while at the same time
> being operationally effective and timely," Rattray said. "We hope this
> can become the model for more collaborative response in the face of
> future threats."
>
> Rick Wesson, chief executive of Support Intelligence, a security firm in
> San Francisco, called the international effort to contain the worm
> "incredible."
>
> "Here we have the Chinese cooperating with the Americans on a cyber
> threat when so much of the rhetoric [from the U.S. government] is about
> concerns around the cyber threat from China," said Wesson, who was also
> one of the researchers who began registering Conficker domains back in
> November.
>
> But it's too soon for the community to declare victory, Wesson said. The
> next domain-based worm could significantly ratchet up the number of
> domains, and thereby sideline a large number of Web site names that
> might otherwise be commercially viable and sought after by legitimate
> Internet users.
>
> "I think we're going to have successes and we're going to have failures,
> and this one clearly isn't a success until Microsoft has paid a quarter
> of million dollars and the individuals behind this worm are in jail,"
> Wesson said.
>
>

  1. 2009-02-01 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS Projects
  2. 2009-02-01 Ronny Abraham <ronny.coder-at-gmail.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS Projects
  3. 2009-02-01 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS Projects
  4. 2009-02-01 Ronny Abraham <ronny.coder-at-gmail.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS Projects
  5. 2009-02-01 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS Projects
  6. 2009-02-01 Ronny Abraham <ronny.coder-at-gmail.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS Projects
  7. 2009-02-03 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS Projects
  8. 2009-02-04 Amy Coleman <acoleman-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS Projects
  9. 2009-02-04 Amy Coleman <acoleman-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS Projects
  10. 2009-02-05 Ronny Abraham <ronny.coder-at-gmail.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS Projects
  11. 2009-02-05 Ronny Abraham <ronny.coder-at-gmail.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] funny onion news
  12. 2009-02-05 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] [announcements-at-a-teamgroup.com: 7th Annual 2009 High Performance Linux on Wall Street]
  13. 2009-02-06 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] MYSQL falling apart
  14. 2009-02-08 Ronny Abraham <ronny.coder-at-gmail.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] ubuntu wifi
  15. 2009-02-09 From: "Tameek" <tameek-at-gmail.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] ubuntu wifi
  16. 2009-02-09 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Outliner Project
  17. 2009-02-09 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] ubuntu wifi
  18. 2009-02-09 Ronny Abraham <ronny.coder-at-gmail.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] ubuntu wifi
  19. 2009-02-09 Ronny Abraham <ronny.coder-at-gmail.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] ubuntu wifi
  20. 2009-02-09 Ronny Abraham <ronny.coder-at-gmail.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] best line I've read
  21. 2009-02-09 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] best line I've read
  22. 2009-02-09 Ron Guerin <ron-at-vnetworx.net> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] best line I've read
  23. 2009-02-09 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] best line I've read
  24. 2009-02-09 Ronny Abraham <ronny.coder-at-gmail.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] best line I've read
  25. 2009-02-09 Michael L Richardson <mlr52-at-michaellrichardson.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] best line I've read
  26. 2009-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] [nyc-at-workatjelly.com: Jelly in Brooklyn this Friday 2/13]
  27. 2009-02-11 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Re: Transit cuts: seeing is believing
  28. 2009-02-11 einker <eminker-at-gmail.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] best line I've read
  29. 2009-02-11 Michael L Richardson <mlr52-at-michaellrichardson.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] best line I've read
  30. 2009-02-11 Elfen Magix <elfen_magix-at-yahoo.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] A Rare Time To Come...
  31. 2009-02-12 Ronny Abraham <ronny.coder-at-gmail.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] internet connection
  32. 2009-02-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] internet connection
  33. 2009-02-15 Michael L Richardson <mlr52-at-michaellrichardson.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Debian
  34. 2009-02-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Debian
  35. 2009-02-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] virus security is finally getting notice
  36. 2009-02-15 Michael L Richardson <mlr52-at-michaellrichardson.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Debian
  37. 2009-02-15 Michael L Richardson <mlr52-at-mycouponmagic.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] virus security is finally getting notice
  38. 2009-02-15 Kevin Mark <kevin.mark-at-verizon.net> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Debian
  39. 2009-02-15 Kevin Mark <kevin.mark-at-verizon.net> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] virus security is finally getting notice
  40. 2009-02-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] virus security is finally getting notice
  41. 2009-02-15 Michael L Richardson <mlr52-at-michaellrichardson.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] virus security is finally getting notice
  42. 2009-02-16 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] DRM not quite dead yet
  43. 2009-02-16 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Copyright Wars continue
  44. 2009-02-16 Ronny Abraham <ronny.coder-at-gmail.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Copyright Wars continue
  45. 2009-02-16 Ronny Abraham <ronny.coder-at-gmail.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] weird project spec
  46. 2009-02-16 Elfen Magix <elfen_magix-at-yahoo.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] weird project spec
  47. 2009-02-16 swd <sderrick-at-optonline.net> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] weird project spec
  48. 2009-02-17 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] HP Linux support
  49. 2009-02-17 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Copyright Wars continue
  50. 2009-02-17 Michael L Richardson <mlr52-at-michaellrichardson.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] HP Linux support
  51. 2009-02-18 Ron Guerin <ron-at-vnetworx.net> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] [Fwd: [nylug-announce] TOMORROW! NYLUG Feb 18 -at- 6:30 PM Brian Gupta
  52. 2009-02-18 Ron Guerin <ron-at-vnetworx.net> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Sunny Dubey's Nov 2008 Linux DJ presentation now available to stream/download
  53. 2009-02-18 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Sunny Dubey's Nov 2008 Linux DJ presentation
  54. 2009-02-19 Paul Robert Marino <prmarino1-at-gmail.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] HP Linux support
  55. 2009-02-19 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Jobs
  56. 2009-02-19 Ron Guerin <ron-at-vnetworx.net> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Sunny Dubey's Nov 2008 Linux DJ presentation
  57. 2009-02-19 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Sunny Dubey's Nov 2008 Linux DJ presentation
  58. 2009-02-20 Amy Coleman <acoleman-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS Projects
  59. 2009-02-20 Amy Coleman <acoleman-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] internet connection
  60. 2009-02-20 Amy Coleman <acoleman-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] weird project spec
  61. 2009-02-20 Amy Coleman <acoleman-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] HP Linux support
  62. 2009-02-20 Ronny Abraham <ronny.coder-at-gmail.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] weird project spec
  63. 2009-02-21 email <redpill-at-rcn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] new email
  64. 2009-02-21 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] new email
  65. 2009-02-21 From: "Beau Gould" <bg-at-capitalmarketsp.com> RE: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] new email
  66. 2009-02-21 Michael L Richardson <mlr52-at-michaellrichardson.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] [Fwd: [nylug-announce] Russ Nelson's OpenStreetmap mapping party
  67. 2009-02-22 email <redpill-at-rcn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] new email
  68. 2009-02-23 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest and hacking date
  69. 2009-02-23 Elfen Magix <elfen_magix-at-yahoo.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest and hacking date
  70. 2009-02-23 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest and hacking date
  71. 2009-02-23 Amy Coleman <acoleman-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] weird project spec
  72. 2009-02-23 Amy Coleman <acoleman-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] new email
  73. 2009-02-24 redpill <redpill-at-rcn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest and hacking date
  74. 2009-02-24 Michael L Richardson <mlr52-at-michaellrichardson.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest and hacking date
  75. 2009-02-24 Michael L Richardson <mlr52-at-mycouponmagic.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] [Fwd: Mandriva Linux Powerpack 2009 available at 50% discount !]
  76. 2009-02-24 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] [Fwd: Jelly in Brooklyn this Friday 2/27]
  77. 2009-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Iraqi Views on US Politics
  78. 2009-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS Finances
  79. 2009-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest Sunday
  80. 2009-02-25 From: "Tameek" <tameek-at-gmail.com> R: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS Finances
  81. 2009-02-25 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Re: [nylug-talk] Installfest Sunday
  82. 2009-02-25 redpill <redpill-at-rcn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest and hacking date
  83. 2009-02-25 Amy Coleman <acoleman-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest and hacking date
  84. 2009-02-25 mlr52-at-michaellrichardson.com RE: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS Finances
  85. 2009-02-25 redpill <redpill-at-rcn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest and hacking date
  86. 2009-02-25 Amy Coleman <acoleman-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest and hacking date
  87. 2009-02-25 Amy Coleman <acoleman-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] IRC as a way to hold meetings
  88. 2009-02-25 Ron Guerin <ron-at-vnetworx.net> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest and hacking date
  89. 2009-02-26 Kevin Mark <kevin.mark-at-verizon.net> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS Finances
  90. 2009-02-26 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS Finances
  91. 2009-02-26 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: R: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS Finances
  92. 2009-02-26 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] NYLXS Finances
  93. 2009-02-26 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest and hacking date
  94. 2009-02-26 Robert Menes <viewtiful.icchan-at-gmail.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest and hacking date
  95. 2009-02-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] MS Verses GNU is heating up
  96. 2009-02-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] 24 percent increase in GNU Sales not satisfying Novell in the recession
  97. 2009-02-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] MS/GNU Legal Battle prelude part II
  98. 2009-02-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest and hacking date
  99. 2009-02-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest Sunday
  100. 2009-02-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] is this mayor NUTS?
  101. 2009-02-27 Robert Menes <viewtiful.icchan-at-gmail.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] is this mayor NUTS?
  102. 2009-02-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] is this mayor NUTS?
  103. 2009-02-27 mlr52-at-michaellrichardson.com Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest Sunday
  104. 2009-02-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] OLPC
  105. 2009-02-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] [Fwd: Re: [linux-elitists] FAT is the new GIF?]
  106. 2009-02-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] [Fwd: Re: [linux-elitists] FAT is the new GIF?]
  107. 2009-02-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] [Fwd: Re: [linux-elitists] FAT is the new GIF?]
  108. 2009-02-27 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] [Fwd: Re: [linux-elitists] FAT is the new GIF?]
  109. 2009-02-27 From: "Paul Robert Marino" <prmarino1-at-gmail.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest Sunday
  110. 2009-02-27 Elfen Magix <elfen_magix-at-yahoo.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] is this mayor NUTS?
  111. 2009-02-27 redpill <redpill-at-rcn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest and hacking date
  112. 2009-02-27 Ron Guerin <ron-at-vnetworx.net> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest Sunday
  113. 2009-02-27 Amy Coleman <acoleman-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest and hacking date
  114. 2009-02-27 Amy Coleman <acoleman-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest and hacking date
  115. 2009-02-28 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] [Fwd: Update Apache2.0 configuration]
  116. 2009-02-28 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Installfest Sunday
  117. 2009-02-28 Ronny Abraham <ronny.coder-at-gmail.com> Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] is this mayor NUTS?

NYLXS are Do'ers and the first step of Doing is Joining! Join NYLXS and make a difference in your community today!