|FROM ||Ruben Safir
|SUBJECT ||Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] (fwd) Re: Anonymous namespace
|-- forwarded message --
From: Ruben Safir
Subject: Re: Anonymous namespace
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 05:37:41 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1307165861 20952 126.96.36.199 (4 Jun 2011 05:37:41 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 05:37:41 +0000 (UTC)
X-Blackjet: Blackjet is a Yankee Fan
X-DRMisTHEFT: Use GNU Linux today
X-From: A Dark Cloud
X-LOCATION: Brooklyn NY - Forget abou' it!
X-NYLXS: Really - yah think computers are supposed to be broken?
User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies)
Xref: panix comp.lang.c++:1086014
On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 17:19:37 +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
> the other is to instantiate all possibilities in the
How can you do that? You would need to know what all the class T's can
be and in a language where you create types on the fly, you can't do that.
You can have limited predefined number of partial or explicit
specifications for the general template. Or I guess you can instantiate
them, but I can't think of how that can be done except within a local
but then you have to call for a.
-- end of forwarded message --