|FROM ||Ruben Safir
|SUBJECT ||Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] (fwd) Re: Anonymous namespace
|-- forwarded message --
From: Ruben Safir
Subject: Re: Anonymous namespace
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 05:42:27 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1307166147 20952 22.214.171.124 (4 Jun 2011 05:42:27 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 05:42:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Blackjet: Blackjet is a Yankee Fan
X-DRMisTHEFT: Use GNU Linux today
X-From: A Dark Cloud
X-LOCATION: Brooklyn NY - Forget abou' it!
X-NYLXS: Really - yah think computers are supposed to be broken?
User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies)
Xref: panix comp.lang.c++:1086018
On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 17:31:37 +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
>> Ok - I'm getting a clearer picture. What specifically did you mean,
>> however, by the phrase "even if they should have external linkage"
> Not declared static.
ah - Thank YOU! I understand better. the haze is lifting.
I used to have a physics teach, Dr Wolf, who used to get questions from
confused students that to me, sounded like complete gibberish. He was
able to parse them and give them the answers they needed, to questions i
don't think they even understood.
-- end of forwarded message --