MESSAGE
| DATE | 2011-06-18 |
| FROM | Ron Guerin
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Brooklyn losing a district at a time when Brooklyn
|
From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Sat Jun 18 18:03:52 2011
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix)
id 4A6833A6E9; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:03:52 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: hangout-outgoing-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com
Received: by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28)
id 39127FE1B4; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:03:52 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: from smasher.vnetworx.net (smasher.vnetworx.net [208.74.145.93])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9F13A6E9
for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:03:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smasher.vnetworx.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smasher.vnetworx.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB5420A179;
Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:04:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.4.4] (ool-4a580188.dyn.optonline.net [74.88.1.136])
by smasher.vnetworx.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7FCF720A16F;
Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:04:30 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4DFD20E2.8040809-at-vnetworx.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:04:18 -0400
From: Ron Guerin
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
CC: swd
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Brooklyn losing a district at a time when Brooklyn
just gained another zip code? And NYC recently added another telephone area
code? Don't smell right.
References: <4DF849D8.3020607-at-panix.com> <4DFB9F16.6010607-at-gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DFB9F16.6010607-at-gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Ruben Safir wrote:
> On 06/17/2011 10:31 AM, swd wrote:
>>
>
>
> no comment?
It's politics, so of course this entire matter is rancidly rotten. Two
districts in the state have to go, and the interests of the people
involved are not part of the consideration. This will be all about the
political parties, and the politicians.
I don't know the facts of this matter, but I'd heard the most likely to
go was Weiner's district. You can thank him for his recent performance
and his being unliked by his colleagues that made this "easy choice"
possible.
- Ron
|
|
