MESSAGE
| DATE | 2011-06-18 |
| FROM | Ruben Safir
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Brooklyn losing a district at a time when
|
From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Sat Jun 18 22:13:44 2011
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix)
id EA9A4FF6C5; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:13:43 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: hangout-outgoing-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com
Received: by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28)
id D9903FF9F9; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:13:43 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82ECFFF6C5
for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:13:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from panix2.panix.com (panix2.panix.com [166.84.1.2])
by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBF732A81;
Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:14:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by panix2.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 20529)
id C59EE33C5F; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:14:29 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:14:29 -0400
From: Ruben Safir
To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Cc: swd
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Brooklyn losing a district at a time when
Brooklyn just gained another zip code? And NYC recently added another
telephone area code? Don't smell right.
Message-ID: <20110619021429.GA11778-at-panix.com>
References: <4DF849D8.3020607-at-panix.com>
<4DFB9F16.6010607-at-gmail.com>
<4DFD20E2.8040809-at-vnetworx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4DFD20E2.8040809-at-vnetworx.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 06:04:18PM -0400, Ron Guerin wrote:
> Ruben Safir wrote:
> > On 06/17/2011 10:31 AM, swd wrote:
> >>
> >
> >
> > no comment?
>
> It's politics, so of course this entire matter is rancidly rotten. Two
> districts in the state have to go, and the interests of the people
> involved are not part of the consideration. This will be all about the
> political parties, and the politicians.
>
> I don't know the facts of this matter, but I'd heard the most likely to
> go was Weiner's district. You can thank him for his recent performance
> and his being unliked by his colleagues that made this "easy choice"
> possible.
>
There hasn't been a Jewish Congressman from Brooklyn in 20 years.
That is wrong,
> - Ron
|
|
