|FROM ||Ruben Safir
|SUBJECT ||Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Brooklyn losing a district at a time when
|From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Sat Jun 18 22:13:44 2011
Received: by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix)
id EA9A4FF6C5; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:13:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28)
id D9903FF9F9; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:13:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [126.96.36.199])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82ECFFF6C5
for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:13:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from panix2.panix.com (panix2.panix.com [188.8.131.52])
by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBF732A81;
Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:14:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by panix2.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 20529)
id C59EE33C5F; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:14:29 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:14:29 -0400
From: Ruben Safir
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Brooklyn losing a district at a time when
Brooklyn just gained another zip code? And NYC recently added another
telephone area code? Don't smell right.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 06:04:18PM -0400, Ron Guerin wrote:
> Ruben Safir wrote:
> > On 06/17/2011 10:31 AM, swd wrote:
> > no comment?
> It's politics, so of course this entire matter is rancidly rotten. Two
> districts in the state have to go, and the interests of the people
> involved are not part of the consideration. This will be all about the
> political parties, and the politicians.
> I don't know the facts of this matter, but I'd heard the most likely to
> go was Weiner's district. You can thank him for his recent performance
> and his being unliked by his colleagues that made this "easy choice"
There hasn't been a Jewish Congressman from Brooklyn in 20 years.
That is wrong,
> - Ron