Thu Oct 28 07:25:58 2021
EVENTS
 FREE
SOFTWARE
INSTITUTE

POLITICS
JOBS
MEMBERS'
CORNER

MAILING
LIST

NYLXS Mailing Lists and Archives
NYLXS Members have a lot to say and share but we don't keep many secrets. Join the Hangout Mailing List and say your peice.

DATE 2020-01-01

HANGOUT

2021-10-28 | 2021-09-28 | 2021-08-28 | 2021-07-28 | 2021-06-28 | 2021-05-28 | 2021-04-28 | 2021-03-28 | 2021-02-28 | 2021-01-28 | 2020-12-28 | 2020-11-28 | 2020-10-28 | 2020-09-28 | 2020-08-28 | 2020-07-28 | 2020-06-28 | 2020-05-28 | 2020-04-28 | 2020-03-28 | 2020-02-28 | 2020-01-28 | 2019-12-28 | 2019-11-28 | 2019-10-28 | 2019-09-28 | 2019-08-28 | 2019-07-28 | 2019-06-28 | 2019-05-28 | 2019-04-28 | 2019-03-28 | 2019-02-28 | 2019-01-28 | 2018-12-28 | 2018-11-28 | 2018-10-28 | 2018-09-28 | 2018-08-28 | 2018-07-28 | 2018-06-28 | 2018-05-28 | 2018-04-28 | 2018-03-28 | 2018-02-28 | 2018-01-28 | 2017-12-28 | 2017-11-28 | 2017-10-28 | 2017-09-28 | 2017-08-28 | 2017-07-28 | 2017-06-28 | 2017-05-28 | 2017-04-28 | 2017-03-28 | 2017-02-28 | 2017-01-28 | 2016-12-28 | 2016-11-28 | 2016-10-28 | 2016-09-28 | 2016-08-28 | 2016-07-28 | 2016-06-28 | 2016-05-28 | 2016-04-28 | 2016-03-28 | 2016-02-28 | 2016-01-28 | 2015-12-28 | 2015-11-28 | 2015-10-28 | 2015-09-28 | 2015-08-28 | 2015-07-28 | 2015-06-28 | 2015-05-28 | 2015-04-28 | 2015-03-28 | 2015-02-28 | 2015-01-28 | 2014-12-28 | 2014-11-28 | 2014-10-28 | 2014-09-28 | 2014-08-28 | 2014-07-28 | 2014-06-28 | 2014-05-28 | 2014-04-28 | 2014-03-28 | 2014-02-28 | 2014-01-28 | 2013-12-28 | 2013-11-28 | 2013-10-28 | 2013-09-28 | 2013-08-28 | 2013-07-28 | 2013-06-28 | 2013-05-28 | 2013-04-28 | 2013-03-28 | 2013-02-28 | 2013-01-28 | 2012-12-28 | 2012-11-28 | 2012-10-28 | 2012-09-28 | 2012-08-28 | 2012-07-28 | 2012-06-28 | 2012-05-28 | 2012-04-28 | 2012-03-28 | 2012-02-28 | 2012-01-28 | 2011-12-28 | 2011-11-28 | 2011-10-28 | 2011-09-28 | 2011-08-28 | 2011-07-28 | 2011-06-28 | 2011-05-28 | 2011-04-28 | 2011-03-28 | 2011-02-28 | 2011-01-28 | 2010-12-28 | 2010-11-28 | 2010-10-28 | 2010-09-28 | 2010-08-28 | 2010-07-28 | 2010-06-28 | 2010-05-28 | 2010-04-28 | 2010-03-28 | 2010-02-28 | 2010-01-28 | 2009-12-28 | 2009-11-28 | 2009-10-28 | 2009-09-28 | 2009-08-28 | 2009-07-28 | 2009-06-28 | 2009-05-28 | 2009-04-28 | 2009-03-28 | 2009-02-28 | 2009-01-28 | 2008-12-28 | 2008-11-28 | 2008-10-28 | 2008-09-28 | 2008-08-28 | 2008-07-28 | 2008-06-28 | 2008-05-28 | 2008-04-28 | 2008-03-28 | 2008-02-28 | 2008-01-28 | 2007-12-28 | 2007-11-28 | 2007-10-28 | 2007-09-28 | 2007-08-28 | 2007-07-28 | 2007-06-28 | 2007-05-28 | 2007-04-28 | 2007-03-28 | 2007-02-28 | 2007-01-28 | 2006-12-28 | 2006-11-28 | 2006-10-28 | 2006-09-28 | 2006-08-28 | 2006-07-28 | 2006-06-28 | 2006-05-28 | 2006-04-28 | 2006-03-28 | 2006-02-28 | 2006-01-28 | 2005-12-28 | 2005-11-28 | 2005-10-28 | 2005-09-28 | 2005-08-28 | 2005-07-28 | 2005-06-28 | 2005-05-28 | 2005-04-28 | 2005-03-28 | 2005-02-28 | 2005-01-28 | 2004-12-28 | 2004-11-28 | 2004-10-28 | 2004-09-28 | 2004-08-28 | 2004-07-28 | 2004-06-28 | 2004-05-28 | 2004-04-28 | 2004-03-28 | 2004-02-28 | 2004-01-28 | 2003-12-28 | 2003-11-28 | 2003-10-28 | 2003-09-28 | 2003-08-28 | 2003-07-28 | 2003-06-28 | 2003-05-28 | 2003-04-28 | 2003-03-28 | 2003-02-28 | 2003-01-28 | 2002-12-28 | 2002-11-28 | 2002-10-28 | 2002-09-28 | 2002-08-28 | 2002-07-28 | 2002-06-28 | 2002-05-28 | 2002-04-28 | 2002-03-28 | 2002-02-28 | 2002-01-28 | 2001-12-28 | 2001-11-28 | 2001-10-28 | 2001-09-28 | 2001-08-28 | 2001-07-28 | 2001-06-28 | 2001-05-28 | 2001-04-28 | 2001-03-28 | 2001-02-28 | 2001-01-28 | 2000-12-28 | 2000-11-28 | 2000-10-28 | 2000-09-28 | 2000-08-28 | 2000-07-28 | 2000-06-28 | 2000-05-28 | 2000-04-28 | 2000-03-28 | 2000-02-28 | 2000-01-28 | 1999-12-28

Key: Value:

Key: Value:

MESSAGE
DATE 2020-01-22
FROM From: "Donald Robertson, III, DBD"
SUBJECT Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] It is time to end the DMCA anti-circumvention
From hangout-bounces-at-nylxs.com Wed Jan 22 17:32:57 2020
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (www2.mrbrklyn.com [96.57.23.82])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C0B16114A;
Wed, 22 Jan 2020 17:32:56 -0500 (EST)
X-Original-To: hangout-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: hangout-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8247B161134; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 17:32:52 -0500 (EST)
Resent-From: Ruben Safir
Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 17:32:52 -0500
Resent-Message-ID: <20200122223252.GA29420-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com>
Resent-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
X-Original-To: ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CDA0161132
for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 17:02:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from crmserver2p.fsf.org ([2001:470:142:5::223]:45444)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from )
id 1iuO4g-00055a-JG
for ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 17:02:10 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fsf.org;
s=my; h=Date:To:Subject:From:MIME-Version;
bh=SLpdBxWJ5ssS4mPLDS3Di8200/tqYQr5de6+PAPwaP8=; b=nUT476SxwF3Pvs7HOt4kDab6O2
ua/bGEIyV6PxdAlZeEZ4f/o3kgTPX8SnADZ5jk1ClBDSS3o3G2hmDXkW/09g/h+M5nv1rFViB50zb
K3/dwAShRfcShJyq7vf/kbVNXrO/Q/7zpaPz6RWsutRvYanIT8I4eLIdwUz14j1Rd8QnRjNTS9ILp
3ebdw40He54RPggyoXx7+0+jwUcGat1H6gcD+06uqhXWc9IeiOfmy6X2un6jO55Qc63ZfX43QQ2Wb
ow1i05zR//UH0kBq08Ky0oKJyhvuGYiFEOxMqg551ghD/UrNR3E4AxR8Qnkrtnp8Zp40g2nendNLe
5F3doKZg==;
Received: from localhost ([::1]:59924 helo=my.fsf.org)
by crmserver2p.fsf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
(envelope-from )
id 1iuO4g-0006an-E7
for ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 17:02:10 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Donald Robertson, III, DBD"
job_id: 160315
To: Ruben Safir
Precedence: bulk
X-CiviMail-Bounce: crmmailer+b.160315.50496809.afb23cd4cc50c8b8-at-fsf.org
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 17:02:10 -0500
Message-Id:
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not
recognized.
Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] It is time to end the DMCA anti-circumvention
exemptions process and put a stop to DRM
X-BeenThere: hangout-at-nylxs.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: "Donald Robertson, III, DBD"
List-Id: NYLXS Tech Talk and Politics
List-Unsubscribe: ,

List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,

Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1436341870=="
Errors-To: hangout-bounces-at-nylxs.com
Sender: "Hangout"

--===============1436341870==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_0950e349e70962bfdb7e85f5965bba3d"

--=_0950e349e70962bfdb7e85f5965bba3d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

*Please consider adding to your address
book, which will ensure that our messages reach you and not your spam
box.*

*Read and share online: *


Dear Ruben Safir,

It seems like only [yesterday][0] that we were wrapping up the 2018
round of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)
anti-circumvention exemption process. As we've written [time and
again][1]:

>Every three years, supporters of user rights are forced to go through
> a Kafkaesque process fighting for exemptions from the
> anti-circumvention provisions of the DMCA... In short, under the
> DMCA's rules, everything not permitted is forbidden. Unless we expend
> time and resources to protect and expand exemptions, users could be
> threatened with legal consequences for circumventing the Digital
> Restrictions Management (DRM) on their own devices and software, and
> could face criminal penalties for sharing tools that allow others to
> do the same. Exemptions don't fix the harm brought about by the
> DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions, but they're the only crumbs
> Congress deigned to throw us when they tossed out our rights as
> users.

[0]: https://www.defectivebydesign.org/blog/2018_dmca_anticircumvention_exemption_process_some_progress_not_enough
[1]: https://www.defectivebydesign.org/end-DMCA-anti-circumvention-provisions

Although it is accurate, there's one aspect of the process that is
missing from that description: the length. While the process kicks off
every three years, the work that goes into fighting exemptions,
whether previously granted or newly requested, has a much shorter
interval. As you can see from the timeline of events from the [2018
round of the exemptions process][2], the process stretches on for
months and months. For each exemption we have to prepare research,
documents, and our comments through wave after wave of submission
periods. For the 2018 exemptions round, the first announcements from
the United States Copyright Office were in July of 2017, on a process
that concluded in October of 2018. Fifteen months, every three
years. If you do the math, that means we're fighting about 40% of the
time just to ensure that exemptions we already won continue, and that
new exemptions will be granted. If the timeline from the last round
holds up, then we're only a few short months away from starting this
whole circus back up again.

[2]: https://www.copyright.gov/1201/2018/

Describing it as a circus seems an appropriate label for the purpose
of this whole process. It's not meant to be an effective mechanism for
protecting the rights of users: it's a method for eating up the time
and resources of those who are fighting for justice. If we don't step
up, users could lose the ability to control their own computing and
software. It's like pushing a rock up a mile-long hill only to have it
pushed back down again when we've barely had a chance to catch our
breath.

In that sense, the exemptions process is much like DRM itself: a
method of control that pretends to be about rights. DRM is the use of
technological measures to control what users can do with their own
devices and digital media. As we've [explained previously][3]:

>DRM creates a damaged good; it prevents you from doing what would be
> possible without it. This concentrates control over production and
> distribution of media, giving DRM peddlers the power to carry out
> massive digital book burnings and conduct large scale surveillance
> over people's media viewing habits.

[3]: https://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm_digital_restrictions_management

The DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions use legal measures to
reinforce this harmful level of control, and the exemptions process
uses blind bureaucracy to increase the burden of fighting that
control.

We have had some success in diminishing that bureaucracy, even if we
haven't been able to kill it outright. In the 2018 round of the
exemptions process, the Copyright Office simplified the fight to
protect previously granted exemptions, letting them stand unless
challenged. That resulted in all previously granted exemptions being
granted again in the 2018 round. That is good progress, but it is not
enough, because there are companies with billions of dollars who can
easily raise challenges to each exemption.

We call once again for the end of the DMCA's anti-circumvention
provisions, and the absurd exemptions process that comes with
it. Users have the right to control their own computing, and the right
to share the tools we create with others. The DMCA violates those
rights.

We shouldn't have to fight for what is already morally ours. But fight
we will, and we won't stop no matter how many hurdles they throw in
front of us. We can't stop until all users have their rights
restored. Here's what you can do to help:

* If you are in the US, complain to your congressperson about section
1201 of the DMCA, which threatens criminal penalties for removing
DRM.

* Sign up for our [mailing
list](https://www.fsf.org/free-software-supporter/subscribe) so you
can be ready for the next round in this fight.

* Support our work by [becoming a member](https://my.fsf.org/join) or
making a [donation](https://www.fsf.org/about/ways-to-donate).

*This article is a part of [Copyright
Week](https://www.eff.org/copyrightweek).*

Sincerely,
Donald Robertson, III
Licensing and Compliance Manager

--
* Follow us on GNU social at and on Twitter at .
* Read about why we use Twitter, but only with caveats at .
* Subscribe to our blog via RSS at .
* Donate to support the campaign at .
* Read the Free Software Foundation Privacy Policy at .

You can unsubscribe from the Defective by Design mailing list by visiting the link .

To stop all email from the Free Software Foundation, including Defective by Design and the Free Software Supporter newsletter, click this link: .

Defective by Design is a campaign of the Free Software Foundation:

51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor
Boston, Massachusetts 02110-1335
United States

--=_0950e349e70962bfdb7e85f5965bba3d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

































Defective by Design







Please consider adding info@defectivebydesign.org to your address
book, which will ensure that our messages reach you and not your spam
box.



Read and share online: https://www.defectivebydesign.org/blog/it_time_end_dmca_anticircumvention_exemptions_process_and_put_stop_drm





Dear Ruben Safir,



It seems like only yesterday that we were wrapping up the 2018
round of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)
anti-circumvention exemption process. As we've written time and
again
:



Every three years, supporters of user rights are forced to go through
a Kafkaesque process fighting for exemptions from the
anti-circumvention provisions of the DMCA... In short, under the
DMCA's rules, everything not permitted is forbidden. Unless we expend
time and resources to protect and expand exemptions, users could be
threatened with legal consequences for circumventing the Digital
Restrictions Management (DRM) on their own devices and software, and
could face criminal penalties for sharing tools that allow others to
do the same. Exemptions don't fix the harm brought about by the
DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions, but they're the only crumbs
Congress deigned to throw us when they tossed out our rights as
users.



Although it is accurate, there's one aspect of the process that is
missing from that description: the length. While the process kicks off
every three years, the work that goes into fighting exemptions,
whether previously granted or newly requested, has a much shorter
interval. As you can see from the timeline of events from the 2018
round of the exemptions process
, the process stretches on for
months and months. For each exemption we have to prepare research,
documents, and our comments through wave after wave of submission
periods. For the 2018 exemptions round, the first announcements from
the United States Copyright Office were in July of 2017, on a process
that concluded in October of 2018. Fifteen months, every three
years. If you do the math, that means we're fighting about 40% of the
time just to ensure that exemptions we already won continue, and that
new exemptions will be granted. If the timeline from the last round
holds up, then we're only a few short months away from starting this
whole circus back up again.



Describing it as a circus seems an appropriate label for the purpose
of this whole process. It's not meant to be an effective mechanism for
protecting the rights of users: it's a method for eating up the time
and resources of those who are fighting for justice. If we don't step
up, users could lose the ability to control their own computing and
software. It's like pushing a rock up a mile-long hill only to have it
pushed back down again when we've barely had a chance to catch our
breath.



In that sense, the exemptions process is much like DRM itself: a
method of control that pretends to be about rights. DRM is the use of
technological measures to control what users can do with their own
devices and digital media. As we've explained previously:



DRM creates a damaged good; it prevents you from doing what would be
possible without it. This concentrates control over production and
distribution of media, giving DRM peddlers the power to carry out
massive digital book burnings and conduct large scale surveillance
over people's media viewing habits.



The DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions use legal measures to
reinforce this harmful level of control, and the exemptions process
uses blind bureaucracy to increase the burden of fighting that
control.



We have had some success in diminishing that bureaucracy, even if we
haven't been able to kill it outright. In the 2018 round of the
exemptions process, the Copyright Office simplified the fight to
protect previously granted exemptions, letting them stand unless
challenged. That resulted in all previously granted exemptions being
granted again in the 2018 round. That is good progress, but it is not
enough, because there are companies with billions of dollars who can
easily raise challenges to each exemption.



We call once again for the end of the DMCA's anti-circumvention
provisions, and the absurd exemptions process that comes with
it. Users have the right to control their own computing, and the right
to share the tools we create with others. The DMCA violates those
rights.



We shouldn't have to fight for what is already morally ours. But fight
we will, and we won't stop no matter how many hurdles they throw in
front of us. We can't stop until all users have their rights
restored. Here's what you can do to help:




  • If you are in the US, complain to your congressperson about section
    1201 of the DMCA, which threatens criminal penalties for removing
    DRM.


  • Sign up for our mailing
    list
    so you
    can be ready for the next round in this fight.


  • Support our work by becoming a member or
    making a donation.





This article is a part of Copyright
Week
.



Sincerely,

Donald Robertson, III

Licensing and Compliance Manager







--=_0950e349e70962bfdb7e85f5965bba3d--

--===============1436341870==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Hangout mailing list
Hangout-at-nylxs.com
http://lists.mrbrklyn.com/mailman/listinfo/hangout

--===============1436341870==--

  1. 2020-01-02 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Proposals for the new GNU/FSF relationship
  2. 2020-01-05 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] AI revolution
  3. 2020-01-05 Shorefront News <donotreply-at-wordpress.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] =?utf-8?b?W05ldyBwb3N0XSBHYXJnaXVsb+KAmXMgUGFy?=
  4. 2020-01-06 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: Proposals for the new GNU/FSF
  5. 2020-01-07 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] embperl bug
  6. 2020-01-07 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: undefined value in Emperl/Util.pm
  7. 2020-01-07 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Apache 2.4?
  8. 2020-01-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] A summary of some open discussions
  9. 2020-01-08 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS]
  10. 2020-01-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: GNU - Principles and Guidelines
  11. 2020-01-08 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] A summary of some open discussions
  12. 2020-01-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU - Principles and Guidelines
  13. 2020-01-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: A summary of some open discussions
  14. 2020-01-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: Proposals for the new GNU/FSF
  15. 2020-01-08 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Request to mailing list gnu-misc-discuss rejected
  16. 2020-01-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Request to mailing list gnu-misc-discuss rejected
  17. 2020-01-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] A summary of some open discussions
  18. 2020-01-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: A summary of some open discussions
  19. 2020-01-08 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: Proposals for the new GNU/FSF
  20. 2020-01-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: A summary of some open discussions
  21. 2020-01-08 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: A summary of some open discussions
  22. 2020-01-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: A summary of some open discussions
  23. 2020-01-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: A summary of some open discussions
  24. 2020-01-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: A summary of some open discussions
  25. 2020-01-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU - Principles and Guidelines
  26. 2020-01-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] A summary of some open discussions
  27. 2020-01-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS]
  28. 2020-01-08 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS]
  29. 2020-01-09 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Movie of the WEEK! - Starring OJ Simpson
  30. 2020-01-09 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Facial Recongition in NYC Traffic
  31. 2020-01-10 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] THis is the other WWI film
  32. 2020-01-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: GNU - Principles and Guidelines
  33. 2020-01-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS]
  34. 2020-01-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU - Principles and Guidelines
  35. 2020-01-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU - Principles and Guidelines
  36. 2020-01-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU - Principles and Guidelines
  37. 2020-01-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU - Principles and Guidelines
  38. 2020-01-12 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] built to last
  39. 2020-01-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU - Principles and Guidelines
  40. 2020-01-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Request to mailing list gnu-misc-discuss
  41. 2020-01-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] A summary of some open discussions
  42. 2020-01-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: GNU - Principles and Guidelines
  43. 2020-01-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU - Principles and Guidelines
  44. 2020-01-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Slowly the threat is coming into view
  45. 2020-01-12 Gabor Szabo <gabor-at-szabgab.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] [Perlweekly] #442 - Fellowship of the Perl
  46. 2020-01-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU - Principles and Guidelines
  47. 2020-01-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] A summary of some open discussions
  48. 2020-01-13 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] A summary of some open discussions
  49. 2020-01-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] A summary of some open discussions
  50. 2020-01-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] A summary of some open discussions
  51. 2020-01-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Moderation
  52. 2020-01-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] suspending FSF contributor agreements with
  53. 2020-01-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Moderation
  54. 2020-01-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] A summary of some open discussions
  55. 2020-01-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU - Principles and Guidelines
  56. 2020-01-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU - Principles and Guidelines
  57. 2020-01-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] A summary of some open discussions
  58. 2020-01-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU - Principles and Guidelines
  59. 2020-01-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] A summary of some open discussions
  60. 2020-01-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: suspending FSF contributor agreements
  61. 2020-01-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] A summary of some open discussions
  62. 2020-01-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS]
  63. 2020-01-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: suspending FSF contributor agreements
  64. 2020-01-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: Moderation
  65. 2020-01-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: suspending FSF contributor agreements
  66. 2020-01-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: Moderation
  67. 2020-01-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] MAriaDB conference in NYC
  68. 2020-01-14 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] suspending FSF contributor agreements with
  69. 2020-01-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: suspending FSF contributor agreements
  70. 2020-01-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: A summary of some open discussions
  71. 2020-01-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: A summary of some open discussions
  72. 2020-01-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: A summary of some open discussions
  73. 2020-01-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: A summary of some open discussions
  74. 2020-01-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: Moderation
  75. 2020-01-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: A summary of some open discussions
  76. 2020-01-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Request to mailing list gnu-misc-discuss
  77. 2020-01-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Request to mailing list gnu-misc-discuss
  78. 2020-01-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Request to mailing list gnu-misc-discuss
  79. 2020-01-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Request to mailing list gnu-misc-discuss
  80. 2020-01-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Request to mailing list gnu-misc-discuss
  81. 2020-01-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Request to mailing list gnu-misc-discuss
  82. 2020-01-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Request to mailing list gnu-misc-discuss
  83. 2020-01-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Request to mailing list gnu-misc-discuss
  84. 2020-01-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: A summary of some open discussions
  85. 2020-01-15 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: A summary of some open discussions
  86. 2020-01-17 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] the charge against Parnes and Fruman
  87. 2020-01-19 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Movie of the Week
  88. 2020-01-20 Gabor Szabo <gabor-at-szabgab.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] [Perlweekly] #443 - New Book: Mojolicious Web
  89. 2020-01-21 Rich Bowen <rbowen-at-apache.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] [users-at-httpd] Call for presentations for
  90. 2020-01-20 Alumni Association <jesse-at-gohiretalent.net> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Reminder: Special Invitation: HireNYC 2020 - Hire
  91. 2020-01-22 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] A summary of some open discussions
  92. 2020-01-22 From: "American Museum of Natural History" <mat-at-amnh.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] MAT Application Deadline Extended
  93. 2020-01-22 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Request to mailing list gnu-misc-discuss rejected
  94. 2020-01-22 From: "Donald Robertson, III, DBD" <info-at-defectivebydesign.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] It is time to end the DMCA anti-circumvention
  95. 2020-01-22 Ben Creisler <bcreisler-at-gmail.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] [dinosaur] Pan-Chelidae origin + amorphous carbon
  96. 2020-01-22 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Fwd: Re: A summary of some open discussions
  97. 2020-01-23 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] A summary of some open discussions
  98. 2020-01-23 NCPA eCommunications <ncpa.ecommunications-at-ncpanet.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Owners, the time is now | NCPA's qAM | Jan. 23,
  99. 2020-01-25 From: "Rijksmuseum" <nieuwsbrief-at-news.rijksmuseum.nl> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Rijksstudio Award 2020 | International design
  100. 2020-01-27 Olivier Hainque <hainque-at-adacore.com> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] GNU Tools Cauldron 2020
  101. 2020-01-28 From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos-at-systemhalted.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new
  102. 2020-01-28 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new
  103. 2020-01-28 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new
  104. 2020-01-28 From: "Andreas R." <avr-at-softwarelibre.nl> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new
  105. 2020-01-28 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new
  106. 2020-01-28 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new
  107. 2020-01-28 DJ Delorie <dj-at-delorie.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new
  108. 2020-01-28 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new
  109. 2020-01-28 ams-at-gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new
  110. 2020-01-28 From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos-at-systemhalted.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new
  111. 2020-01-28 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new
  112. 2020-01-28 Ruben Safir <mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new
  113. 2020-01-29 Jean Louis <bugs-at-gnu.support> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new
  114. 2020-01-30 IEEE Spectrum <ieee-spectrum-at-deliver.ieee.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] Tech Alert
  115. 2020-01-30 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] You might find this to be of interest
  116. 2020-01-30 baruchd <baruchd-at-optonline.net> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] You might find this to be of interest
  117. 2020-01-30 NCPA eCommunications <ncpa.ecommunications-at-ncpanet.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] It's time for some personal advocacy | NCPA's qAM
  118. 2020-01-30 Ruben Safir <ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] You might find this to be of interest
  119. 2020-01-28 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new
  120. 2020-01-29 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo-at-gnu.org> Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Feedback on the GNU Social contract and new
  121. 2020-01-22 NCPA eCommunications <ncpa.ecommunications-at-ncpanet.org> Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] It's your chance to speak truth to power | NCPA's

NYLXS are Do'ers and the first step of Doing is Joining! Join NYLXS and make a difference in your community today!