|FROM ||From: "Joshua Zeidner"
|SUBJECT ||Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] FISA and Telco Immunity
|From lest-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Fri Feb 22 11:58:34 2008
Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m1MGwWf2027726
for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:58:34 -0500
Received: (from majordomo-at-localhost)
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id m1MGwWt5027725
for hangout-outgoings; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:58:32 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: www2.mrbrklyn.com: majordomo set sender to lest-hangout-at-nylxs.com using -f
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [188.8.131.52])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m1MGwOT9027721
for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:58:30 -0500
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c38so725465wra.17
for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:58:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
Received: by 10.141.193.1 with SMTP id v1mr115097rvp.245.1203699494093;
Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:58:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.141.35.15 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:58:14 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:58:14 -0700
From: "Joshua Zeidner"
To: "Ruben Safir" , hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] FISA and Telco Immunity
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 07:35:55AM -0700, Joshua Zeidner wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > No one is suggesting that. What the chorus of activists are
> > > > suggesting are the breaches of FISA laws. FISA laws make it difficult
> > > > for people to exploit our government funded surveillance programs.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Tell me more. If it is OT here, you can bring it to the NYLXS hangout
> > > mailing list.
> > Ruben,
> > I am truly surprised that you are not more aware of this issue!
> That's not how I'd view it but which part of the issue do you think I
> am not more aware of?
Well you appear to support the opinion that breaching FISA laws are
necessary to ensure our safety. I may write something up in the near
future, but for now here are some links if you are so inclined, from
the inimitable David Isenberg: