|FROM ||Paul Smith
|SUBJECT ||Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Future plans for Autotools
|From hangout-bounces-at-nylxs.com Mon Jan 25 17:30:40 2021
Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (www2.mrbrklyn.com [188.8.131.52])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6A9164048;
Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:30:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 151BD16400F; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:30:26 -0500 (EST)
Resent-From: Ruben Safir
Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:30:25 -0500
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [184.108.40.206])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D514D163FEE
for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:56:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:33982 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
for ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:56:03 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36762)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l48tp-0001mr-Vw
for autoconf-at-gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:55:50 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60600)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
(envelope-from ) id 1l48tl-0005oI-LL
for autoconf-at-gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:55:49 -0500
Received: from pool-96-233-64-159.bstnma.fios.verizon.net
by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l48tW-0001wr-LK
for autoconf-at-gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:55:38 -0500
From: Paul Smith
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:55:24 -0500
Organization: GNU's Not UNIX!
User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.4-0ubuntu1
Subject: Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Future plans for Autotools
List-Id: NYLXS Tech Talk and Politics
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 13:27 -0700, John Calcote wrote:
> > To be honest if Automake-generated Makefile.in files only worked
> > for users with, say, sufficiently modern versions of GNU Make, I'm
> > not sure there would be any point in using Automake.
> I'm not sure I see your point Nick. Why use Automake? Because I'd
> much rather write (and maintain) two lines of automake code than even
> a single page of GNU make code.
I agree that automake is still useful. GNU make itself still uses
automake, even though it provides a separate shell script to build GNU
make for systems that don't have any make program and as such, it could
easily just say "if you don't have GNU make use the script, then you
have GNU make" rather than caring about a portable makefile.
But, automake provides a lot of really useful boilerplate and even more
importantly (to me) ensures that the make environment conforms to
various GNU standards, such as variables, targets, etc., for free.
You may note, if you check out the Git repo for GNU make, that there's
a separate makefile "maintMakefile" which contains maintainer-specific
stuff which is written for GNU make and would be very hard to write in
"portable" make, but that file is not included in the released source
package because it doesn't contain anything that non-maintainers need.
Hangout mailing list