MESSAGE
| DATE | 2015-02-17 |
| FROM | Ruben Safir
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Matching this mailing list for procmail rules
|
From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Tue Feb 17 01:23:23 2015
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix)
id 3D2AC160020; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:23:23 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28)
id 2DB611612E0; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:23:23 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B92160020
for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:23:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.0.0.19] (unknown [96.57.23.82])
by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42F0318D99
for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:23:22 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <54E2DE59.20005-at-panix.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:23:21 -0500
From: Ruben Safir
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Matching this mailing list for procmail rules
References: <20150217042933.GH2231-at-linuxmafia.com> <54E2C76D.90706-at-panix.com> <20150217053946.GM2527-at-linuxmafia.com> <54E2D99C.9030804-at-panix.com>
In-Reply-To: <54E2D99C.9030804-at-panix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
[NYLXS: HANGOUT]
X-BeenThere: hangout-at-nylxs.com
X-Mailing-list: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Precedence: list
List-Id: NYLXS General Discussion Forum
List-Unsubscribe:
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe:
On 02/17/2015 01:03 AM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> On 02/17/2015 12:39 AM, Rick Moen wrote:
>> 'I'll add them if you can prove they have RFC
>> imprimatur' (loosely paraphrased),
>
> that is a misinterpretation...
>
what do thiese headers look like
|
|
