MESSAGE
DATE | 2015-02-17 |
FROM | Ruben Safir
|
SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Matching this mailing list for procmail rules
|
From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Tue Feb 17 01:23:23 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) id 3D2AC160020; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:23:23 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28) id 2DB611612E0; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:23:23 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89]) by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B92160020 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:23:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.0.0.19] (unknown [96.57.23.82]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42F0318D99 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:23:22 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <54E2DE59.20005-at-panix.com> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:23:21 -0500 From: Ruben Safir User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hangout-at-nylxs.com Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Matching this mailing list for procmail rules References: <20150217042933.GH2231-at-linuxmafia.com> <54E2C76D.90706-at-panix.com> <20150217053946.GM2527-at-linuxmafia.com> <54E2D99C.9030804-at-panix.com> In-Reply-To: <54E2D99C.9030804-at-panix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com [NYLXS: HANGOUT] X-BeenThere: hangout-at-nylxs.com X-Mailing-list: hangout-at-nylxs.com Precedence: list List-Id: NYLXS General Discussion Forum List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe:
On 02/17/2015 01:03 AM, Ruben Safir wrote: > On 02/17/2015 12:39 AM, Rick Moen wrote: >> 'I'll add them if you can prove they have RFC >> imprimatur' (loosely paraphrased), > > that is a misinterpretation... >
what do thiese headers look like
|
|