MESSAGE
| DATE | 2015-02-17 |
| FROM | Ruben Safir
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Matching this mailing list for procmail rules
|
From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Tue Feb 17 01:31:06 2015
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix)
id D54B1161297; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:31:05 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28)
id C5E631612E2; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:31:05 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530BD161297
for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:31:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from panix2.panix.com (panix2.panix.com [166.84.1.2])
by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BDC814326
for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:31:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: by panix2.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 20529)
id ED58033C60; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:31:04 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:31:04 -0500
From: Ruben Safir
To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Matching this mailing list for procmail rules
Message-ID: <20150217063104.GA15544-at-panix.com>
References: <20150217042933.GH2231-at-linuxmafia.com>
<54E2C76D.90706-at-panix.com>
<20150217053946.GM2527-at-linuxmafia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150217053946.GM2527-at-linuxmafia.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
[NYLXS: HANGOUT]
X-BeenThere: hangout-at-nylxs.com
X-Mailing-list: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Precedence: list
List-Id: NYLXS General Discussion Forum
List-Unsubscribe:
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 09:39:46PM -0800, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Ruben Safir (mrbrklyn-at-panix.com):
>
> > you mean majordomo. Procmail is it's own problem. I think I can add
> > mail headers if you point me to the RFC
>
> I already did, you know.
> http://www.professional.org/procmail/listname_id.rc
>
> Some common headers used for traffic control to/from mailing lists are,
> without particular attention to RFCs:
>
...
> doing Reply-To munging when the consensus was settled in 2001.
> http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/?page=netiquette#replyto
>
Ok - I think I added the headers although I'm suprised that the post
with the word unsub scribe got through the mailing list ...
Ruben
|
|
