MESSAGE
DATE | 2015-02-17 |
FROM | Ruben Safir
|
SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Matching this mailing list for procmail rules
|
From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Tue Feb 17 01:31:06 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) id D54B1161297; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:31:05 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28) id C5E631612E2; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:31:05 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89]) by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530BD161297 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:31:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from panix2.panix.com (panix2.panix.com [166.84.1.2]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BDC814326 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:31:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by panix2.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 20529) id ED58033C60; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:31:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:31:04 -0500 From: Ruben Safir To: hangout-at-nylxs.com Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Matching this mailing list for procmail rules Message-ID: <20150217063104.GA15544-at-panix.com> References: <20150217042933.GH2231-at-linuxmafia.com> <54E2C76D.90706-at-panix.com> <20150217053946.GM2527-at-linuxmafia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150217053946.GM2527-at-linuxmafia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com [NYLXS: HANGOUT] X-BeenThere: hangout-at-nylxs.com X-Mailing-list: hangout-at-nylxs.com Precedence: list List-Id: NYLXS General Discussion Forum List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 09:39:46PM -0800, Rick Moen wrote: > Quoting Ruben Safir (mrbrklyn-at-panix.com): > > > you mean majordomo. Procmail is it's own problem. I think I can add > > mail headers if you point me to the RFC > > I already did, you know. > http://www.professional.org/procmail/listname_id.rc > > Some common headers used for traffic control to/from mailing lists are, > without particular attention to RFCs: >
... > doing Reply-To munging when the consensus was settled in 2001. > http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/?page=netiquette#replyto >
Ok - I think I added the headers although I'm suprised that the post with the word unsub scribe got through the mailing list ...
Ruben
|
|