MESSAGE
| DATE | 2015-02-17 |
| FROM | Ruben Safir
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Matching this mailing list for procmail rules
|
From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Tue Feb 17 01:39:53 2015
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix)
id D4F5C1612E3; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:39:52 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28)
id C59841612E7; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:39:52 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462721612E3
for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:39:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.0.0.19] (unknown [96.57.23.82])
by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E956A14AF7
for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:39:51 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <54E2E237.8050803-at-panix.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:39:51 -0500
From: Ruben Safir
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Matching this mailing list for procmail rules
References: <20150217042933.GH2231-at-linuxmafia.com> <54E2C76D.90706-at-panix.com> <20150217053946.GM2527-at-linuxmafia.com> <54E2D99C.9030804-at-panix.com> <54E2DE59.20005-at-panix.com> <20150217063329.GO2527-at-linuxmafia.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150217063329.GO2527-at-linuxmafia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
[NYLXS: HANGOUT]
X-BeenThere: hangout-at-nylxs.com
X-Mailing-list: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Precedence: list
List-Id: NYLXS General Discussion Forum
List-Unsubscribe:
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe:
On 02/17/2015 01:33 AM, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Ruben Safir (mrbrklyn-at-panix.com):
>
>> what do thiese headers look like
> You're kidding, right?
>
> 1. I already sent you a representative set that I _even_ tailored for
> your particular use case. Which was hardly necessary, and in retrospect
> I'm surprised I bothered, because:
>
> 2. In addition, you can trivially see live examples for yourself in
> received mail from pretty much any of the other mailing lists you're on.
>
> Please do tell me you were kidding. The alternative is really
> depressing.
>
I think I was just testing the new headers with a random message.
The message was .. what do these NEW headers to the mailing list, the
ones up above this message,
look like :)
I'm gonna send you some fluoxetine and alprazalam.
Or Burbon. I'm gonna have Birband and then finish studying.
Ruben
|
|
