MESSAGE
DATE | 2015-02-17 |
FROM | Ruben Safir
|
SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Matching this mailing list for procmail rules
|
From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Tue Feb 17 01:39:53 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) id D4F5C1612E3; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:39:52 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28) id C59841612E7; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:39:52 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89]) by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462721612E3 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:39:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.0.0.19] (unknown [96.57.23.82]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E956A14AF7 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:39:51 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <54E2E237.8050803-at-panix.com> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:39:51 -0500 From: Ruben Safir User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hangout-at-nylxs.com Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Matching this mailing list for procmail rules References: <20150217042933.GH2231-at-linuxmafia.com> <54E2C76D.90706-at-panix.com> <20150217053946.GM2527-at-linuxmafia.com> <54E2D99C.9030804-at-panix.com> <54E2DE59.20005-at-panix.com> <20150217063329.GO2527-at-linuxmafia.com> In-Reply-To: <20150217063329.GO2527-at-linuxmafia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com [NYLXS: HANGOUT] X-BeenThere: hangout-at-nylxs.com X-Mailing-list: hangout-at-nylxs.com Precedence: list List-Id: NYLXS General Discussion Forum List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe:
On 02/17/2015 01:33 AM, Rick Moen wrote: > Quoting Ruben Safir (mrbrklyn-at-panix.com): > >> what do thiese headers look like > You're kidding, right? > > 1. I already sent you a representative set that I _even_ tailored for > your particular use case. Which was hardly necessary, and in retrospect > I'm surprised I bothered, because: > > 2. In addition, you can trivially see live examples for yourself in > received mail from pretty much any of the other mailing lists you're on. > > Please do tell me you were kidding. The alternative is really > depressing. >
I think I was just testing the new headers with a random message.
The message was .. what do these NEW headers to the mailing list, the ones up above this message, look like :)
I'm gonna send you some fluoxetine and alprazalam.
Or Burbon. I'm gonna have Birband and then finish studying.
Ruben
|
|