MESSAGE
| DATE | 2015-02-17 |
| FROM | Rick Moen
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Matching this mailing list for procmail rules
|
From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Tue Feb 17 01:33:41 2015
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix)
id 4C2291612E2; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:33:41 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28)
id 3CB7A1612E4; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:33:41 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Received: from linuxmafia.com (linuxmafia.COM [198.144.195.186])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF86F1612E2
for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:33:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rick by linuxmafia.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from )
id 1YNbir-0004I5-W0
for hangout-at-nylxs.com; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 22:33:30 -0800
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 22:33:29 -0800
From: Rick Moen
To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Matching this mailing list for procmail rules
Message-ID: <20150217063329.GO2527-at-linuxmafia.com>
References: <20150217042933.GH2231-at-linuxmafia.com>
<54E2C76D.90706-at-panix.com>
<20150217053946.GM2527-at-linuxmafia.com>
<54E2D99C.9030804-at-panix.com>
<54E2DE59.20005-at-panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54E2DE59.20005-at-panix.com>
Organization: If you lived here, you'd be $HOME already.
X-Mas: Bah humbug.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP:
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rick-at-linuxmafia.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxmafia.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
[NYLXS: HANGOUT]
X-BeenThere: hangout-at-nylxs.com
X-Mailing-list: hangout-at-nylxs.com
Precedence: list
List-Id: NYLXS General Discussion Forum
List-Unsubscribe:
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe:
Quoting Ruben Safir (mrbrklyn-at-panix.com):
> what do thiese headers look like
You're kidding, right?
1. I already sent you a representative set that I _even_ tailored for
your particular use case. Which was hardly necessary, and in retrospect
I'm surprised I bothered, because:
2. In addition, you can trivially see live examples for yourself in
received mail from pretty much any of the other mailing lists you're on.
Please do tell me you were kidding. The alternative is really
depressing.
|
|
