MESSAGE
DATE | 2015-02-17 |
FROM | Rick Moen
|
SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Matching this mailing list for procmail rules
|
From owner-hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Tue Feb 17 01:33:41 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) id 4C2291612E2; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:33:41 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: hangout-outgoing-at-mrbrklyn.com Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 28) id 3CB7A1612E4; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:33:41 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com Received: from linuxmafia.com (linuxmafia.COM [198.144.195.186]) by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF86F1612E2 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 01:33:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from rick by linuxmafia.com with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YNbir-0004I5-W0 for hangout-at-nylxs.com; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 22:33:30 -0800 Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 22:33:29 -0800 From: Rick Moen To: hangout-at-nylxs.com Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Matching this mailing list for procmail rules Message-ID: <20150217063329.GO2527-at-linuxmafia.com> References: <20150217042933.GH2231-at-linuxmafia.com> <54E2C76D.90706-at-panix.com> <20150217053946.GM2527-at-linuxmafia.com> <54E2D99C.9030804-at-panix.com> <54E2DE59.20005-at-panix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54E2DE59.20005-at-panix.com> Organization: If you lived here, you'd be $HOME already. X-Mas: Bah humbug. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rick-at-linuxmafia.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxmafia.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com [NYLXS: HANGOUT] X-BeenThere: hangout-at-nylxs.com X-Mailing-list: hangout-at-nylxs.com Precedence: list List-Id: NYLXS General Discussion Forum List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe:
Quoting Ruben Safir (mrbrklyn-at-panix.com):
> what do thiese headers look like
You're kidding, right?
1. I already sent you a representative set that I _even_ tailored for your particular use case. Which was hardly necessary, and in retrospect I'm surprised I bothered, because:
2. In addition, you can trivially see live examples for yourself in received mail from pretty much any of the other mailing lists you're on.
Please do tell me you were kidding. The alternative is really depressing.
|
|