|FROM ||Ruben Safir
|SUBJECT ||Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Abbott Scam
|From hangout-bounces-at-nylxs.com Sun Jun 11 03:22:26 2017
Received: from www.mrbrklyn.com (www.mrbrklyn.com [22.214.171.124])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988CD163F56;
Sun, 11 Jun 2017 03:22:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id CFB34163F54; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 03:22:22 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 03:22:22 -0400
From: Ruben Safir
To: Rick Moen
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Abbott Scam
List-Id: NYLXS Tech Talk and Politics
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:53:45PM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Ruben Safir (mrbrklyn-at-panix.com):
> > On 06/11/2017 01:58 AM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 08:15:37PM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> > >> Quoting Ruben Safir (ruben-at-mrbrklyn.com):
> > >>
> > >>> Abbott Pharmacuetics is giving kickback to healthcare insurance
> > >>> companies to mandate that Pharmacies must use their lifestyle diabetic
> > >>> testing supplies. This is thanks to Obama care.
> > >>
> > >> If Abbott Pharmaceuticals is engaging in corruption, it should get
> > >> prosecuted for that. Please provide your evidence to both this mailing
> > >> list and state prosecutors. Thank you.
> > It is fucking corrupt to give insurance companies kickbacks and then
> > shake down healthcare providers, mostly pharmacists, so that they have
> > to pay you for the privileged to provide healthcare for patients.
> I can't help noticing that you nowhere address what I said, providing
> zero of the requested evidence. Perhaps this is because 'Please provide
> your evidence to both this mailing list and state prosecutors' is the
> rational thing to do, but you cannot do it. Just as you have no answer
> to any of my other points, and I was wasting my time attempting to
> assume you were willing to stop and think.
It is rational if you want to break your contract with CVS/Carmark
and have your businesses pulled out from underneth you since the
contract explicitly says you can't give out such information and nobody
is hiring you as a lawyer to get the contract back while 70% of your
volum has been destroyed.
> Ah well. I notice that, even though you cannot address a simple and
> obvious explanation, that doesn't stop you from -- as usual --
> attempting to simply out-should everyone else, with a string of _six_
> new messages where you reply to yourself repeatedly, starting with the
> one I'm replying to:
> 6 N 170610 Ruben Safir (116) ,->Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Abbott Sca
> 7 N 170610 Ruben Safir ( 23) |->
> 8 N 170610 Ruben Safir (175) ,->
> 9 N 170610 Ruben Safir (321) |->
> 10 N 170610 Ruben Safir (200) |->
> 11 N 170610 Ruben Safir ( 56) Re: [Hangout - NYLXS] Abbott Scam
> You know, Ruben, you aren't paying me to process your logorrhea, so in
> this case I'm going to just skip it. If you wish to not be ignored
> going forward, try getting your point across without attempting to cover
> the mailing list with a blizzard of dialogues with yourself.
Problem is now solved...
> > If you say, one more time, that just because something is legal that
> > it is not corruption and immoral, I'll kick you off the list and
> > terminate the friendship.
> Excuse me? I have never said that obviously wrong thing at any point,
> past or present -- and I would appreciate your immediate, public apology
> for claiming I did.
Yes you did. You know you did. You do it all the time and you are
doing it now. Your a fustrated lawyer and you think that the proof of
something is when a court hears a case and renders judgment.
But it doesn't work lke that. The majority of the law is corrupt and
paid for by lobbiests, like the lobbiests from Abbott and it takes 100's
of millions of dollars to out lobby them and judicate them.
It is the essense of the evil of government.
> I'll be charitable and assume you are having cognition problems, as the
> alternative would be to assume libel.
> > I don't care WHY you think this kind of racketeering is legal.
> I did not assert or imply that, either. i will expect a _second_ apology
> for your assertion to the contrary.
> Hangout mailing list
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998
DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS - RI Safir 2002
http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software
http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/resources - Unpublished Archive
http://www.coinhangout.com - coins!
Being so tracked is for FARM ANIMALS and and extermination camps,
but incompatible with living as a free human being. -RI Safir 2013
Hangout mailing list