MESSAGE
| DATE | 2003-07-21 |
| FROM | Ron Guerin
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [hangout] School Technology
|
From owner-hangout-desteny-at-mrbrklyn.com Mon Jul 21 09:54:39 2003
Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mrbrklyn.com (8.12.3/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id h6LDsd1B004194
for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 09:54:39 -0400
Received: (from mdom-at-localhost)
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h6LDsdh8004193
for hangout-desteny; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 09:54:39 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: www2.mrbrklyn.com: mdom set sender to owner-hangout-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com using -f
Received: from vnetworx.net (www.vnetworx.net [64.39.31.89])
by mrbrklyn.com (8.12.3/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with SMTP id h6LDsc1B004186
for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 09:54:38 -0400
Received: (qmail 17699 invoked by uid 513); 21 Jul 2003 13:58:22 -0000
Received: from dsl081-215-128.nyc2.dsl.speakeasy.net (64.81.215.128)
by www.vnetworx.net with SMTP; 21 Jul 2003 13:58:22 -0000
Subject: Re: [hangout] School Technology
From: Ron Guerin
To: Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS
Cc: Sunny Dubey , NYLXS
In-Reply-To: <20030721121956.GA3353-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com>
References: <200307200500.h6K502Pa013503-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com>
<200307201255.48133.ray-pub-at-nyc.rr.com>
<20030720184227.GA20093-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com>
<200307210738.05928.dubeys-at-bxscience.edu>
<20030721121956.GA3353-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: VNetworX Internet
Message-Id: <1058795803.31249.155746.camel-at-dante>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3
Date: 21 Jul 2003 09:56:44 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Ron Guerin
List: New Yorker GNU Linux Scene
Admin: To unsubscribe send unsubscribe name-at-domian.com in the body to hangout-request-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 12535
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1560
Lines: 35
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 08:19, Ruben Safir Secretary NYLXS wrote:
> Despite the fact that useless flamewars occur over different technologies,
> one can still make authoratative distictions between different tools
> for different tasks, and this task is educating children (or young adults).
I think one of the saddest things to happen since I was a kid is the
demise of using the right tool_s_. The idea that something should be
this _or_ that is limited thinking, advanced by those who're more
interested in squeezing their developer's salaries than in generating
revenue.
When I was young and green, it was not unusual to see "jobs" that
consisted of parts written in FORTRAN, COBOL, PL/I and RPG. Many jobs
used two or three different programming languages. Anyone who owns one
of those "unitools" that is supposed to be good for everything knows
they're better off with a half-dozen basic tools. The combination
screwdriver/pliers/wirecutters/hammer generally sucks at everything and
is good for nothing. I don't think it's all that different with code.
Sure, you _can_ use C for everything, but it can't be a good idea.
Substitute your favorite language for C in the last sentence, and flame
away. ;)
I strongly believe that the commoditization of developers is a bad
thing. Bad for America, bad for business, and bad for developers. But
that's the way things are going.
- Ron
____________________________
NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
Fair Use -
because it's either fair use or useless....
NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
|
|
