MESSAGE
| DATE | 2001-12-08 |
| FROM | Ron Guerin
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [hangout] Stallman re: Information Producers Initiative
|
From owner-hangout-desteny-at-mrbrklyn.com Sat Dec 8 18:39:56 2001
Received: from mail.rm-cpa.com (mail.rm-cpa.com [216.112.229.114])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id fB8NduY05008
for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 18:39:56 -0500
Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (dsl254-112-136.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.112.136])
by mail.rm-cpa.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA12232;
Sat, 8 Dec 2001 18:35:43 -0500
Received: (from mdom-at-localhost)
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id fB8NceI04983
for hangout-desteny; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 18:38:40 -0500
Received: from vnetworx.net (www.vnetworx.net [64.39.31.89])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with SMTP id fB8NcdY04975
for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 18:38:39 -0500
Received: (qmail 21464 invoked by uid 513); 8 Dec 2001 23:39:09 -0000
Received: from dsl081-215-127.nyc2.dsl.speakeasy.net (64.81.215.127)
by www.vnetworx.net with SMTP; 8 Dec 2001 23:39:09 -0000
Subject: Re: [hangout] Stallman re: Information Producers Initiative
From: Ron Guerin
To: Ruben Safir
Cc: Jon Britton , hangout-at-nylxs.com
In-Reply-To: <20011208182605.I3836-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com>
References: <3C1061AF.E7678DB2-at-RealMeasures.dyndns.org>
<20011207090429.A22739-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com>
<20011208100302.B11674-at-breakwindows.com>
<20011208182605.I3836-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.0.99+cvs.2001.12.06.08.57 (Preview Release)
Date: 08 Dec 2001 18:37:17 -0500
Message-Id: <1007854637.7336.29.camel-at-amory>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Ron Guerin
List: New Yorkers Linux Scene
Admin: To unsubscribe send unsubscribename-at-domian.com to hangout-request-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 19374
Status: RO
Content-Length: 653
Lines: 25
On Sat, 2001-12-08 at 18:26, Ruben Safir wrote:
>
> Yeah
>
> I don't like the terminology and I think it's misleading...period.
>
> It should be liberated software, or perpetual public access software.
Freedomware?
Libertyware?
Odd names are not necessarily bad, if it makes people ask "What _is_
that?" The problem with "free software" is that people assume they know
what it means. That's why I usually capitalize it as Free Software so
that at least some folks know that it means something more than the
words themselves.
Ron
____________________________
New Yorker Linux Users Scene
Fair Use -
because it's either fair use or useless....
|
|
