MESSAGE
| DATE | 2004-07-04 |
| FROM | From: "Ruben I Safir - Secretary NYLXS"
|
| SUBJECT | RE: [hangout] blowing up Small Schools
|
From owner-hangout-destenys-at-mrbrklyn.com Sun Jul 4 20:27:00 2004
X-UIDL: Yhm!!;a9"!9cR"!ofP!!
Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mrbrklyn.com (8.12.11/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id i650R0JR007597
for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 20:27:00 -0400
Received: (from mdom-at-localhost)
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.12.11/8.12.3/Submit) id i650Qx5m007596
for hangout-destenys; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 20:26:59 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: www2.mrbrklyn.com: mdom set sender to owner-hangouts-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com using -f
Received: from freedom-it.com (flatbush.mrbrklyn.com [10.0.0.62])
by mrbrklyn.com (8.12.11/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id i650Qx2t007591;
Sun, 4 Jul 2004 20:26:59 -0400
From: "Ruben I Safir - Secretary NYLXS"
To: "Inker, Evan" , "'Adam Kosmin'" ,
hangout-at-nylxs.com
Subject: RE: [hangout] blowing up Small Schools
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 21:37:19 -0500
Message-Id: <20040705013548.M31391-at-mrbrklyn.com>
In-Reply-To: <386AEEE1B7BAC34CB4DDF394C23492785F512B-at-w2cs-nyk02.gam.com>
References: <386AEEE1B7BAC34CB4DDF394C23492785F512B-at-w2cs-nyk02.gam.com>
X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.30 20040131
X-OriginatingIP: 24.46.133.59 (ruben)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Sender: owner-hangouts-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ruben I Safir - Secretary NYLXS"
List: New Yorker GNU Linux Scene
Admin: To unsubscribe send unsubscribe name-at-domian.com in the body to hangout-request-at-www2.mrbrklyn.com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on www2.mrbrklyn.com
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.63
X-Spam-Level:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 37026
Status: RO
Content-Length: 4311
Lines: 121
I think the monolithich kernel are refers to the ability to run a
single OS at a time on a single machine from the kernal space.
What does Mach do?
Ruben
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:14:12 +0100, Inker, Evan wrote
> Monolithic Kernels
> Built into one single binary.
> Have everything they need in that binary.
> Are loaded completely into memory at boot time.
> (and stay there!)
>
> Pre-date micro-kernel architecture by at least ten years.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> Node:Micro-kernel Architectures, Next:Is Linux Purely Monolithic?,
> Previous:Monolithic Kernels, Up:Monolithic Kernel vs. Micro-kernel
> Architectures
>
> Micro-kernel Architectures
> Have an extremely small core.
> Only the small core remains in memory at all times.
> Device drivers and other additional items are loaded as-needed.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> Node:Is Linux Purely Monolithic?, Previous:Micro-kernel
> Architectures, Up:Monolithic Kernel vs. Micro-kernel Architectures
>
> Is Linux Purely Monolithic?
> Linux by and large is monolithic.
>
> However, Linux permits modules, a system whereby certain parts of
> the kernel may be loaded at runtime.
>
> Linux modules are reminiscent of micro-kernel architectures, but
> Linux really remains basically a monolithic architecture.
>
> Regards,
>
> Evan M. Inker (New York) x. 4615
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Kosmin [mailto:akosmin-at-nyc.rr.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 8:59 PM
> To: hangout-at-nylxs.com
> Subject: Re: [hangout] Defending Small Schools
>
> " Monolithic isnt always a bad thing. The Linux kernel is
> considered " monolithic. The GNU Hurd kernel is considered to be a
> mico kernel. " " Steve M
>
> I never understood this statement regarding the Linux kernel. From
> what I understand, it can be monolithic if compiled as such. The
> other route being a modular one.
>
> Explanation is needed...
>
> Adam
>
> " ____________________________
> " NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
> " Fair Use -
> " because it's either fair use or useless....
> " NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
> "
>
> --
>
> "Yes, Your Honor. Now, where we are so far, in at least my
> line of reasoning, is I want to walk the Court through enough of our
> complaint to help the Court understand that IBM clearly did
> contribute a lot of the Unix-related information into Linux. We just
> don't know what it is."
>
> -- Kevin McBride SCO vs. IBM 12/05/03 ____________________________
> NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
> Fair Use -
> because it's either fair use or useless....
> NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
>
> ****************************************************************************
> This message contains confidential information and is intended only
> for the individual or entity named. If you are not the named addressee
> you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
> Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received
> this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
> E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive
> late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does
> not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this
> message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
> If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
> This message is provided for informational purposes and should not
> be construed as an invitation or offer to buy or sell any securities
> or related financial instruments. GAM operates in many jurisdictions
> and is regulated or licensed in those jurisdictions as required.
****************************************************************************
>
> ____________________________
> NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
> Fair Use -
> because it's either fair use or useless....
> NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
--
NYLXS - New Yorks Free Software Scene
____________________________
NYLXS: New Yorker Free Software Users Scene
Fair Use -
because it's either fair use or useless....
NYLXS is a trademark of NYLXS, Inc
|
|
