|FROM ||Ruben Safir
|SUBJECT ||Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] (fwd) Re: Human & ape evolution
|-- forwarded message --
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:58c4:0:b0:3f0:ae3e:245 with SMTP id u4-20020ac858c4000000b003f0ae3e0245mr335356qta.5.1682586566547;
Thu, 27 Apr 2023 02:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:ba82:0:b0:387:2586:17bd with SMTP id
k124-20020acaba82000000b00387258617bdmr161676oif.6.1682586566241; Thu, 27 Apr
2023 02:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 02:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=188.8.131.52; posting-account=pysjKgkAAACLegAdYDFznkqjgx_7vlUK
Subject: Re: Human & ape evolution
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 09:09:26 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: panix sci.bio.paleontology:77231
On Thursday, 27 April 2023 at 07:00:49 UTC+3, JTEM wrote:
> oot...-at-hot.ee wrote:
> > Show me what textbooks teach that our ancestors went into
> > savanna to chase antelopes?
> Why? Are you a child? You were never exposed to such an idea?
> I'm calling you a liar. I'm denouncing you as a lying troll.
Yes, I had read of that idiotic idea only from trolls like JTEM
and Marc. And indeed if then to search I found that some bearded
guys lot of decades ago had such "hypothesis". So show me the textbooks.
Oh? You cant? Huge surprise. And you need that garbage only to
push similarly idiotic and ungrounded deep diving ape hypothesis.
> I'm not going to establish the well established. Narcissist obstruct.
> You're a raging narcissist.
> Fuck off.
Why you demonstrate of being immature and obscene?
We all know it. No need to underline that after each sentence.
> > > It's not a straw man. "Da bipedalism came in trees" is pretty new
> > > and idiotic.
> > It is Marcs favorite straw man.
> No. It's idiocy that he argues against.
Idiocy he himself has dug out. It is called straw man argument and
false dichotomy. Did not chase gazelles therefore did deep dive.
How does that follow? So does not follow and so has been pointlessly
> > > The good Doctor sees this as evidence for "Aquaboreal," I see it as
> > > evidence for an animal existing in number of environments... the
> > > forest where such traits are very useful, outside the forests where
> > > bipedalism was most useful.
> > >
> > > There's very strong evidence for this, btw. If you want to talk
> > > "Popular," the idea that australopithecus occupied a wide range,
> > > a number of environments is "Popular."
> > Yes
> "Environments" is plural.... more than one environment.
How does it matter? Ape is not nailed to ground like a tree. I am in
urban region of city with about half millon people. It is 15 minutes
walk to nearest coast and hour walk to nearest forest. Totally
> > What? I do read scientific articles
> I doubt that. And you can't read usenet posts for comprehension, there's
> no point is pretending you read & understand scientific papers.
Do not mirror, I'm not you.
> > So eggs, birds, meat, seeds and nuts contain no DHA?
> No. None. They contain radioactive isotopes that destroy DHA.
> If you want to make a case for your terrestrial DHA,. make it. STOP
> asking me or anyone else to make it for you.
If you write that Elvis is alive or that DHA rich foods do not contain
it then what I can say. Just take your meds.
> > > Coastal dispersal.
> > Also nearby coast is useful, tidal forces can bring or help to trap lot
> > of useful things. But living on coast is hard, forest near coast is
> > lot better and safer.
> So they were dead on the coast. "Coastal Dispersal," is in your mind
> when dead ancestors walked everywhere from Sundaland to South
> Africa, and every point in between... dead.
> And certainly not eating!
> I mean, how can dead ancestors eat?
Yes take your meds. You are talking to yourself and arguing about
some kind of nonsense that was not said out with yourself.
-- end of forwarded message --
Hangout mailing list