|FROM ||Ruben Safir
|SUBJECT ||Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] (fwd) Re: Human & ape evolution
|-- forwarded message --
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:448f:b0:74d:74ea:ce19 with SMTP id x15-20020a05620a448f00b0074d74eace19mr6375518qkp.9.1683745925301;
Wed, 10 May 2023 12:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:11d5:b0:192:6570:697d with SMTP id
21-20020a05687011d500b001926570697dmr6960168oav.4.1683745924982; Wed, 10 May
2023 12:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 12:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=184.108.40.206; posting-account=pysjKgkAAACLegAdYDFznkqjgx_7vlUK
Subject: Re: Human & ape evolution
Injection-Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 19:12:05 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: panix sci.bio.paleontology:77279
On Wednesday, 10 May 2023 at 20:28:26 UTC+3, JTEM wrote:
> oot...-at-hot.ee wrote:
> > You are still incapable of giving cites to your textbooks claiming
> > that "antelope" hypothesis. Nothing
> I haven't offered any cites establishing that the sun rises in the east
> and sets in the west.
> Of course I haven't.
> savanna idiocy, "Endurance running" was spoon fed to the public for
I do not believe you. I look from Wikipedia:
Where are links to textbooks and decades of spoon-feeding?
Nowhere. Whole article seems as skeptical as I am. So you
can't provide what does not exist. How is it sun raising from east?
> Of course you're ignorant. You're so goddamn stupid that you are
> literally "arguing" that nobody supports the idea and that the good
> Doctor is wrong for saying that it's a dumb.
Misrepresentation. I am saying that he brings up that clearly
unpopular hypothesis as false dichotomy of his even worse
"swamp ape" hypothesis.
> You're pretending to agree with him. Right now. Here. In this thread.
> You have REPEATEDLY "argued" that you agree with him, that the
> savanna idiocy is idiocy.
Of course running around in heat does not look like clever thing to do.
Our ancestors were supposed to be clever animals. So if our ancestors
actually hunted some grazers or browsers (where is evidence?) then
probably by trapping or ambushing, not by chasing like idiots. Only thing
that feels even more dumb idea is diving into some tropical swamp
(why? where is evidence of that?). And no one can imagine why you think
that those were the only two choices available for upright walking ape.
Can you explain?
-- end of forwarded message --
Hangout mailing list