|FROM ||Ruben Safir
|SUBJECT ||Subject: [Hangout - NYLXS] (fwd) Re: Human & ape evolution
|-- forwarded message --
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1a89:b0:3f2:2ac7:cda9 with SMTP id s9-20020a05622a1a8900b003f22ac7cda9mr9356087qtc.11.1683921880562;
Fri, 12 May 2023 13:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:110f:b0:195:c8ce:2b62 with SMTP id
15-20020a056870110f00b00195c8ce2b62mr9257665oaf.0.1683921880220; Fri, 12 May
2023 13:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 13:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a02:a03f:8dee:f400:a8a0:f171:2faf:ba38;
Subject: Re: Human & ape evolution
From: marc verhaegen
Injection-Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 20:04:40 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: panix sci.bio.paleontology:77302
> > > > 4 frequent paleo-anthropological prejudices, with 0 evidence:
> > > > Many PAs still *assume* that human ancestors
> > > > 1) became bipedal when we left the trees for the gound??
> > > > 2) came Out-of-Africa (OoA)??
> > > > 3) were savanna-dwellers???
> > > That is not that popular hypothesis. You typically use it as straw man.
> > > Found remains show indications that our ancestors were still well
> > > adapted to climbing trees, even after they had begun to walk upright.
> > of course:
> > https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
> You *are* parroting there groundless H.P. Lowecraft fan-fiction by Alister
> Hardy and Elaine Morgan from two human generations ago. Back then it
> was "purely hypothetical" because of gap in fossil record and methods for
> sequencing genes were still under development. Right now it is clearly kook
> theory that is contradicting with all our evidence. ...
:-DDD *your* evidence!! :-DDD
-- end of forwarded message --
Hangout mailing list