|Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] over ruled on OBL targeting.....
|Quoting Ruben Safir (mrbrklyn-at-panix.com):
> But he is not the dangerous and nasty Hillary Clinton who never met a
> copyright law she didn't approve of:
Ah, right, her lawmaking puissance back when she was First Lady!
Mr. Trump, on the other hand doesn't particularly like the First
Amendment (the idiocy about Muslims and 'opening up' the libel
statutes, for example), nor the long tradition of an orderly transition
(I won't be having a fainting spell over the recent 'keep you in suspense'
narcissist tantrum, unlike many liberals, nor the 'we should just cancel
the election and just give it to Trump' stuff, either. It's just noise
from the clown car, and a loser who doesn't accept losing remains a loser.)
> FIFTH, suspend immigration from terror-prone regions where vetting
> cannot safely occur. All vetting of people coming into our country will
> be considered extreme vetting.
So, here's a question that I figure even a voter willing to fall for the
Border Wall Paid for by Mexico scam can understand: Let's say you're an
Algerian ISIS terrorist looking to commit destruction inside the USA.
Do you (1) apply for immigration to the USA, going through the current
incarnation of 'extreme vetting', or (2) get a tourist visa?
hangout mailing list