|FROM ||Rick Moen
|SUBJECT ||Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] clinton is just not qualified ... and this is
|From hangout-bounces-at-nylxs.com Fri Oct 28 15:54:15 2016
Received: from www.mrbrklyn.com (www.mrbrklyn.com [126.96.36.199])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2533161312;
Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:54:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from linuxmafia.com (linuxmafia.COM [188.8.131.52])
by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32BE5160E77
for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:54:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rick by linuxmafia.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from ) id 1c0DEB-0001Ez-68
for hangout-at-nylxs.com; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:54:11 -0700
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:54:11 -0700
From: Rick Moen
Organization: If you lived here, you'd be $HOME already.
X-Mas: Bah humbug.
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxmafia.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] clinton is just not qualified ... and this is
just the troubles with Iran
Reply-To: NYLXS Discussions List
List-Id: NYLXS Discussions List
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Quoting Ruben Safir (mrbrklyn-at-panix.com):
> On 10/28/2016 02:17 PM, Rick Moen wrote:
> > On the basis of which justification, the WMD fraud,
> There was no fraud. But on the bases that Iraq had an active nuclear
> weapons program...
If 'active' means 'doing nothing'.
> and a state of the art jet proposition lab
I have no idea what this refers to, but it's not a weapon of mass
> and that the sanctions were beginning to erode and because I didn't
> the mother fucker who poured chemical weapons on his population, not
> to mention on our soldiers, and that he drained the ecosystem in the
> straits, set Kuiwait on fire and fought a bloody war to a standstill
> with Iran for 8 years, bleeding his nation, and his kids killed people
> at dinner parties for fun, and because ONE fucking less genocidal
> maniac in the world is fine and I LIKED HAVING 1 MILLION US SOLDERS
> smack in the middle of the middle east within easy access to Terrain
> and Damascus right after 9-11.
Ruben, stop. Ask yourself: Do you actually think I'm really stupid?
If no, then consider whether trying to play bait and switch on me with a
simple historical question is in your interest.
Consider further whether you are ever, _ever_ likely to get anywhere
with me by throwing tantrums. I have a sister who threw tantrums all
through our preteen and teenage years together, in which I always backed
down and let her have her way as a tactical measure because I regarded
that as trivia compared to the additional artificial stress killing our
mother, who was already fighting critical hypertension, clinical
depression, and a nearly single-handed (and successful) lawsuit against
Boeing Company over their negligence that killed her husband, my and my
I deliberately yielded to my sisters demands in all of her screaming
fits, all the years we were together, until she moved out. Happily, Mom
survived, and made it to 2011. And guess how many tantrums I've yielded
even a single dust-covered inch to, since the day Sis moved out? Pick a
number. A really, really small number. Go small enough, you might hit
it on the nose.
Your changing the subject and pretending we were talking about the moral
statute of a deceased dictator doesn't impress me. Your all caps
doesn't impress me and is pretty pathetic. Your complete and total
failure to address the subject _seriously_ doesn't impress me.
You don't actually owe me rational discussion. But when you hand me a
tantrum when I'm trying to have such a discussion, you can rightly
expect to be dismissed as an idiot and a time-water.
hangout mailing list