MESSAGE
DATE | 2016-10-28 |
FROM | Rick Moen
|
SUBJECT | Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] clinton is just not qualified ... and this is
|
From hangout-bounces-at-nylxs.com Fri Oct 28 23:49:49 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com Delivered-To: archive-at-mrbrklyn.com Received: from www.mrbrklyn.com (www.mrbrklyn.com [96.57.23.82]) by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71EAD160E77; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 23:49:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com Delivered-To: hangout-at-nylxs.com Received: from linuxmafia.com (linuxmafia.COM [198.144.195.186]) by mrbrklyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C0E160E77 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 23:49:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rick by linuxmafia.com with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1c0KeA-0004AQ-8v for hangout-at-nylxs.com; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 20:49:30 -0700 Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 20:49:30 -0700 From: Rick Moen To: hangout-at-nylxs.com Message-ID: <20161029034930.GU26372-at-linuxmafia.com> References: <1d59ac79-6ce3-0999-1063-ca11c729c882-at-mrbrklyn.com> <20161027182154.GA26372-at-linuxmafia.com> <5934e873-316d-9733-bcbb-5613e396435a-at-panix.com> <20161028040508.GE26372-at-linuxmafia.com> <0b9bf2b2-b6c7-ad52-a028-165edd0d0a51-at-my.liu.edu> <20161028181720.GO26372-at-linuxmafia.com> <7d3b940f-feae-712e-793d-063350cf91f0-at-panix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7d3b940f-feae-712e-793d-063350cf91f0-at-panix.com> Organization: If you lived here, you'd be $HOME already. X-Mas: Bah humbug. X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rick-at-linuxmafia.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on linuxmafia.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: [Hangout-NYLXS] clinton is just not qualified ... and this is just the troubles with Iran X-BeenThere: hangout-at-nylxs.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: NYLXS Discussions List List-Id: NYLXS Discussions List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: hangout-bounces-at-nylxs.com Sender: "hangout"
Quoting Ruben Safir (mrbrklyn-at-panix.com):
> Iraq had [...] a state of the art jet proposition lab =
(_Proposition) lab, I like that. Turning out devilishly complicated variants on the words 'of' and 'about', I would imagine.]
Here, let me help you, starting with a circa-1990 article: http://fas.org/nuke/guide/iraq/facility/al_kindi.htm
Al Kindi Research Complex / Saad 16 Sa'ad General Establishment
Saad 16, located at Mosul near the Tigris River, was the biggest missile development site in Iraq. It was the primary Condor II missile development center, with additional research conducted on chemical and nuclear weapons. Missile research facilities include launch range, high-speed wind tunnels, missile test facilities, and chemical and electronics laboratories. An aircraft production facility was planned nearby. Among the projects at Saad 16 was a nuclear weapon construction effort.
As early as 1986, the Pentagon had intelligence information linking Sa'ad 16 to missile work, as well as other weapons of mass-destruction. The earliest detailed accounts of Sa'ad 16 in the open press,emerged in January 1989, when the German magazine Stern published a list of the Sa'ad 16 laboratories. At least 78 laboratories were located at Sa'ad 16, including four for testing engine starting material and fuel mixtures, two for calometric testing of fuels, two for developing control systems and navigation equipment and one for measuring aerodynamic quantities on models.
The Al Kindi Research Complex, formerly known as Saad 16 or the Sa'ad General Establishment, was a part of the State Organization for Technical Industries (SOTI), a part of the Iraqi Ministry of Defense. Another name for Sa'ad 16 was the "Research and Development Center." =
In its glory days of circa 1986, Saad 16, according to Jonathan Pollard in 2002[1], was huge and of great concern to the Israelis, who kept trying to pass on information to the US about it, but the US DoD and CIA repeatedly assured the Israelis that it was merely a small scale civilian industrial project', i.e., lied to protect the Iraqis' thin cover story, because of course the US aat that time was trying to help and encourage Iraq's chemical weapons offensive against Iran. =
Guess what? Turns out, we apparently found out in 2003 that the US campaign during the 1980s to foil development of Condor II by denying export licenses to all firms working on Condor II-linked facilities worked as designed. And...
At this point, I was hoping to include a concluding account of 2003 occupation authority / US Army inspection at Saad 16 finding this-and-that or nothing or something, but instead there's a curious silence after the late 1980s, except for... um... numerous commerce notes, of sales to Saad 16 by... us.
Now, as to other US companies which dealt bio war or chemwar agents to Iraq=E2=80=94all such sales having been approved by the US government=E2= =80=94the names of these companies are contained in records of the 1992 Senate hearings, =E2=80=9CUnited States Export Policy Toward Iraq Prior to Iraq=E2=80=99s = Invasion of Kuwait,=E2=80=9D Senate Report 102-996, Senate Committee on Banking Housi= ng and Urban Affairs, 102d Congress, Second Session (October 27, 1992):
Mouse Master (Georgia), Sullaire Corp (Charlotte, North Carolina), Pure Aire (Charlotte, North Carolina), Posi Seal (Conn.), Union Carbide (Conn.), Evapco (Maryland), BDM Corp (Virginia), Spectra Physics (Calif.).
There are about a dozen more.
This also from the Blum article: =E2=80=9CA larger number of American fir= ms supplied Iraq with the specialized computers, lasers, testing and analyzing equipment, and other instruments and hardware vital to the manufacture of nuclear weapons, missiles, and delivery systems. Computers, in particular, play a key role in nuclear weapons development. Advanced computers make it feasible to avoid carrying out nuclear test explosions, thus preserving the program=E2=80=99s secrecy. T= he 1992 Senate hearings implicated [Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA =E2=80=94 among others].=E2=80=9D
Hewlett Packard said that the recipient of its shipments, Saad 16, was some sort of school in Iraq. But in 1990, the Wall St. Journal stated that Saad 16 was a =E2=80=9Cheavily fortified, state-of-the-art [Iraqi] c= omplex for aircraft construction, missile design, and, almost certainly, nuclear-weapons research.=E2=80=9D
There has been a considerable debate about whether Saddam hid some of his bio/chem weapons in Syria, to evade UN weapons inspectors. If he did, then is it possible the current situation in Syria has a few of its roots in the US? Is it possible some of Syria=E2=80=99s WMDs originally c= ame from America?
If you review and think about all these WMD shipments from the US to Iraq, you understand there were many US officials and corporate employees who knew about them. Knew about them then, in the 1980s, and knew about them later, during 2 US wars in Iraq, when American soldiers were sent to Iraq, and could have been exposed to the biochem weapons.
And these officials and employees said nothing. Officials at the CDC and the Dept. of Commerce said nothing. People at the American Type Culture Collection said nothing. People at the Pentagon and the CIA and the NSA said nothing. Presidents said nothing. Employees of the corporations who supplied germs and chemicals said nothing.
It=E2=80=99s clear that the US government shipped those biochem weapons t= o Iraq to aid it in its war against Iran. And yes, Iraq did use chemical weapons against Iran=E2=80=94and also against the Iraqi Kurds. Perhaps you remember that, much later, the US government repeated, over and over, =E2=80=9CSaddam used chemical weapons against the Kurds, his own people,= =E2=80=9D as a reason for attacking Iraq.
So is there any limit beyond which the US government wouldn=E2=80=99t go = to foment war, to wage war?
http://www.thedailysheeple.com/is-this-why-no-one-found-wmds-in-iraq_062014
So, basically, yes at _one_ point through the end of the 1980s, there was (if you trust the WSJ's Beltway leaks) a 'heavily fortified, state-of-the-art [Iraqi] complex for aircraft construction, missile design, and, almost certainly, nuclear-weapons research' facility at Saad 16 north of Mosul where Hussein's regime had attempted Stragelovian techologies. We know this because we... um, cashed ther cheques.
While the August 18 NYT article added new details about the extent of US military collaboration with Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein during Iraq=E2=80=99s 1980-88 war with Iran, it omitted the most outrageous aspe= ct of the scandal: not only did Ronald Reagan=E2=80=99s Washington turn a blind= -eye to the Hussein regime=E2=80=99s repeated use of chemical weapons against Ira= nian soldiers and Iraq=E2=80=99s Kurdish minority, but the US helped Iraq deve= lop its chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs. [...]
According to William Blum, writing in the August 1998 issue of the Progressive, Sam Gejdenson, chairperson of a Congressional subcommittee investigating US exports to Iraq, disclosed that from 1985 until 1990 =E2=80=9Cthe US government approved 771 licenses [only 39 were rejected] = for the export to Iraq of $1.5 billion worth of biological agents and high-tech equipment with military application =E2=80=A6
=E2=80=9CThe US spent virtually an entire decade making sure that Saddam = Hussein had almost whatever he wanted=E2=80=A6 US export control policy was direc= ted by US foreign policy as formulated by the State Department, and it was US foreign policy to assist the regime of Saddam Hussein.=E2=80=9D =
A 1994 US Senate report revealed that US companies were licenced by the commerce department to export a =E2=80=9Cwitch=E2=80=99s brew=E2=80= =9D of biological and chemical materials, including bacillus anthracis (which causes anthrax) and clostridium botulinum (the source of botulism). The American Type Culture Collection made 70 shipments of the anthrax bug and other pathogenic agents.
The report also noted that US exports to Iraq included the precursors to chemical warfare agents, plans for chemical and biological warfare facilities and chemical warhead filling equipment. US firms supplied advanced and specialised computers, lasers, testing and analysing equipment. Among the better-known companies were Hewlett Packard, Unisys, Data General and Honeywell.
Billions of dollars worth of raw materials, machinery and equipment, missile technology and other =E2=80=9Cdual-use=E2=80=9D items were also s= upplied by West German, French, Italian, British, Swiss and Austrian corporations, with the approval of their governments (German firms even sold Iraq entire factories capable of mass-producing poison gas). Much of this was purchased with funds freed by the US CCC credits.
The destination of much of this equipment was Saad 16, near Mosul in northern Iraq. Western intelligence agencies had long known that the sprawling complex was Iraq=E2=80=99s main ballistic missile development c= entre.
Blum reported that Washington was fully aware of the likely use of this material. In 1992, a US Senate committee learned that the commerce department had deleted references to military end-use from information it sent to Congress about 68 export licences, worth more than $1 billion.
In 1986, the US defence department=E2=80=99s deputy undersecretary for tr= ade security, Stephen Bryen, had objected to the export of an advanced computer, similar to those used in the US missile program, to Saad 16 because =E2=80=9Cof the high likelihood of military end use=E2=80=9D. The= state and commerce departments approved the sale without conditions.
http://www.counterpunch.org/2004/06/17/how-reagan-armed-saddam-with-chemica= l-weapons/
It's no coincidence that this commercial honeymoon in the death business =
came to a sudden end in 1990: That's when Hussein triggered the Gulf War by invading Kuwait.
As of 1990, yeah, we knew what Hussein had at Saad 16 because, as the old joke goes, _we cashed the cheques_. And I figure our spooks had theire fingers crossed that they'd find at least one Republican Guard squad brewing up one lousy fresh batch of anthrax, and all they had to do was rub off the 'Made in USA' labels, but all they found was a desert cousin of the South Bronx, i.e., just a junkyard and the same decay products of former sarin, mustard gas, and similar short-lived munitions a decade past usability that they found elsewhere.
Now, I'm betting the above poorly resembles the missing context you were going to supply some time before the heat death of the universe, but OTOH it has the advantage of being actually true.
_______________________________________________ hangout mailing list hangout-at-nylxs.com http://www.nylxs.com/
|
|