MESSAGE
| DATE | 2008-11-14 |
| FROM | From: "Spencer Guiley"
|
| SUBJECT | Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] More on the Network Question
|
From lest-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Fri Nov 14 20:44:07 2008
Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mAF1i5dY030226
for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:44:07 -0500
Received: (from majordomo-at-localhost)
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id mAF1i4W0030224
for hangout-outgoings; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:44:04 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: www2.mrbrklyn.com: majordomo set sender to lest-hangout-at-nylxs.com using -f
Received: from fmailhost04.isp.att.net (fmailhost04.isp.att.net [204.127.217.104])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mAF1i1wv030221
for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:44:04 -0500
Received: from guileys1 (host-216-78-81-66.bgk.bellsouth.net[216.78.81.66])
by isp.att.net (frfwmhc04) with SMTP
id <20081115014358H0400737f1e>; Sat, 15 Nov 2008 01:43:58 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [216.78.81.66]
From: "Spencer Guiley"
To:
References: <491E130F.7050108-at-mrbrklyn.com>
In-Reply-To: <491E130F.7050108-at-mrbrklyn.com>
Subject: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] More on the Network Question
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:43:56 -0500
Message-ID: <00a501c946c3$a0bd3010$e2379030$-at-net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AclGtxAcfv4tNY6RTdi3qDZ2zvIHLQACyVxg
Content-Language: en-us
Sender: lest-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Hi Ya'll,
I'm the guy that Ruben forwarded the note about the Networking question with
the Cable line and DSL both for a web server.
I've been working on this with the other people in our team and this idea
came up. It hasn't gotten passed on to where tech support checks it all out
so this may be something that can't be done.
Can we set up both lines so they come into one router, and then to ONE
server. So we have Server A with both lines going to it. When one line goes
down the next one picks up? This would be almost like a 100% uptime.
We aren't a large hosting company but still strive for the best service
possible without going into debt. We are getting some quotes on T1 lines,
but I don't think they will be able to beat the prices I'm seeing now with
this Business DSL line.
Thanks for any help or ideas!
Spencer Guiley
|
|
