MESSAGE
DATE | 2008-11-15 |
FROM | Ruben Safir
|
SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] More on the Network Question
|
From lest-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Sat Nov 15 00:39:56 2008 Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mAF5dpUU008048 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:39:55 -0500 Received: (from majordomo-at-localhost) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id mAF5dp4i008047 for hangout-outgoings; Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:39:51 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: www2.mrbrklyn.com: majordomo set sender to lest-hangout-at-nylxs.com using -f Received: from [68.167.17.98] (www2.mrbrklyn.com [68.167.17.98]) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mAF5dm07008044 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:39:50 -0500 Message-ID: <491E60A4.1060606-at-mrbrklyn.com> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:39:48 -0500 From: Ruben Safir User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] More on the Network Question References: <491e5d49.0504c00a.2fd1.057a-at-mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: <491e5d49.0504c00a.2fd1.057a-at-mx.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: lest-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Paul Robert Marino wrote: > Have you looked at the possibility of using iproute2 rules for example prioritized routes. > An other option I can think of is using openha or keepalived or other monitoring tool to monitor the route > and automaticaly switch the default route priority. Again this would also involve iproure2 but would have less latency on failover. > Man the "ip" command its realy cool what you can do with it. If your system does not have it look for a package called iproute2. > you would have to write some custom scripts to mannage it but it shouldn't be too difficult. Also a dynamic dns provider could be helpfull to you and for your website if you could find a hosting provider that could give you a deticated vm where you could configure a squid 3 revers proxy that might also be usefull very but be carefull about bandwidth charges. > >
I don't know about dynamic DNS. God I hate how that messes things up.
Ruben > -----Original Message----- > > From: "Spencer Guiley" > Subj: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] More on the Network Question > Date: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:43 pm > Size: 841 bytes > To: > > Hi Ya'll, > > I'm the guy that Ruben forwarded the note about the Networking question with > the Cable line and DSL both for a web server. > > I've been working on this with the other people in our team and this idea > came up. It hasn't gotten passed on to where tech support checks it all out > so this may be something that can't be done. > > Can we set up both lines so they come into one router, and then to ONE > server. So we have Server A with both lines going to it. When one line goes > down the next one picks up? This would be almost like a 100% uptime. > > We aren't a large hosting company but still strive for the best service > possible without going into debt. We are getting some quotes on T1 lines, > but I don't think they will be able to beat the prices I'm seeing now with > this Business DSL line. > > Thanks for any help or ideas! > > Spencer Guiley > > >
|
|