MESSAGE
DATE | 2009-07-08 |
FROM | Ron Guerin
|
SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] internet radio
|
From lest-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Wed Jul 8 18:45:53 2009 Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n68MjpQC022639 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 18:45:53 -0400 Received: (from majordomo-at-localhost) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id n68Mjo2l022638 for hangout-outgoings; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 18:45:50 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: www2.mrbrklyn.com: majordomo set sender to lest-hangout-at-nylxs.com using -f Received: from broadway.vnetworx.net (broadway.vnetworx.net [69.31.43.18]) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n68MjliQ022635 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 18:45:50 -0400 Received: (qmail 26131 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jul 2009 22:45:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.33?) (74.73.9.131) by broadway.vnetworx.net with SMTP for ; 8 Jul 2009 22:45:40 -0000 Message-ID: <4A552189.1060206-at-vnetworx.net> Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:45:29 -0400 From: Ron Guerin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] internet radio References: <862238.19224.qm-at-web38007.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <862238.19224.qm-at-web38007.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: lest-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Elfen Magix wrote: > May the Music Industry as it is die like MJ did. > Sure, you can say good things about the music indiustry, but you can > say a lot of bad things about it- just like MJ. (No offense to MJ or > any of this fans.) > > A lot of internet radio station make squat on playing DJ programs. As > far as I know, ther are more Internet Radio station hosting talk shows > than there are those hosting music. Why should a Talk Show Internet > pay rediculous fees for something they never use. Just because one > operates a radio station on the internet from home does not mean that > they are playing music! Or doing anything else that is illegal! > I'm not aware of talk stations having to pay royalties. That really would be outrageous but wouldn't surprise me much. One of the problems that I'm concerned about is that there were stations that were playing music over which SoundExchange has no authority, and I think the stations *do* have to pay SoundExchange for those. The other was that the royalty rates made it impossible for small stations to remain operational. I think it's still a big problem if there's a deal by which only the big stations can survive. That would be a "tragedy of the Internet" by mocking what's happened to traditional radio.
- Ron
|
|