MESSAGE
| DATE | 2009-07-30 |
| FROM | Ruben Safir
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Moving ISP Services
|
From lestw-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Fri Jul 31 01:51:36 2009
Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n6V5pYoj007656
for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:51:36 -0400
Received: (from majordomo-at-localhost)
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id n6V5pYUU007655
for hangout-outgoings; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:51:34 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: www2.mrbrklyn.com: majordomo set sender to lestw-hangout-at-nylxs.com using -f
Received: from l2mail1.panix.com (l2mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.75])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n6V5pSxV007652
for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:51:32 -0400
Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72])
by l2mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3C277
for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:12:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from panix3.panix.com (panix3.panix.com [166.84.1.3])
by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB481F098
for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:12:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by panix3.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 20529)
id CC7DB8FDE3; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:12:44 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:12:44 -0400
From: Ruben Safir
To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Moving ISP Services
Message-ID: <20090731031244.GA28171-at-panix.com>
References: <334145.44819.qm-at-web38004.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4A6FE3B6.6010309-at-vnetworx.net> <20090729081346.GA15698-at-panix.com> <4A70470B.5010909-at-vnetworx.net> <20090729134837.GA11054-at-panix.com> <4A70637B.5030309-at-vnetworx.net> <20090729173235.GA24980-at-panix.com> <4A70BF34.1000403-at-vnetworx.net> <4A71F53A.6040200-at-vnetworx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4A71F53A.6040200-at-vnetworx.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: lestw-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 03:32:10PM -0400, Ron Guerin wrote:
> Amy Coleman wrote:
> > Verizon is more exspensive than Comcast (to compare). Verizon wanted 60
> > more than comcast for services. I've also heard bad things about verizon
> > as well.
> >
>
> No need to tell us Verizon is evil. We know all about it. Comcast is
> too. And what would you expect? Verizon continues to reap the
> benefits of its formerly government sponsored monopoly, and cable
> franchising isn't exactly a free market either. So if you can even get
> the pathetic excuses for what's peddled as broadband in America, you
> have to choose which arm of the sleazy government coddled duopoly to
> deal with.
>
> - Ron
Well, we are in for a rocky week because I've got to covert everything
to new IP addresses and to make it fun, I tested the Cable/Cisco set up
and it failed.
First - I have to get mrbrklyn.com, nylxs.com, nylxs.org,
freedom-it.com, freedom-it.org and brooklyn-living.com all rereistered
to the new IP addresses. I have to reconfigure bind and the named.conf
file, and then I have to kick the hell out of this lousy cisco router.
You'd think I never handled networks before the way this thing crapped
out out.
In theory the subnet is 36.57.23.80 on a mask of 255.255.255.248
The gateway, which I assumed to be the router is 36.57.23.81
Then we have 36.57.23.82 -3 -4 -5 -6 for usable IP space. But
when I set 36.57.23.82 for the servers outbound ethernet card with a
gateway... the damn 36.57.23.81 was unreachable. If anyone knows
anything about these crapy cisco routers, I can use the help
You'd think I never done this about a thousand times before.
ruben
|
|
