MESSAGE
| DATE | 2009-07-28 |
| FROM | Ruben Safir
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Moving ISP Services
|
From lestw-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Tue Jul 28 19:18:35 2009
Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n6SNIX2u030171
for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:18:35 -0400
Received: (from majordomo-at-localhost)
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id n6SNIWTO030170
for hangout-outgoings; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:18:32 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: www2.mrbrklyn.com: majordomo set sender to lestw-hangout-at-nylxs.com using -f
Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n6SNIUNZ030167
for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:18:32 -0400
Received: from panix2.panix.com (panix2.panix.com [166.84.1.2])
by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9791F095
for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:18:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by panix2.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 20529)
id 4B9AC33CC8; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:18:27 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:18:26 -0400
From: Ruben Safir
To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Moving ISP Services
Message-ID: <20090728231826.GA5531-at-panix.com>
References: <20090728224636.GA28668-at-panix.com> <4A6F8491.6000703-at-vnetworx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4A6F8491.6000703-at-vnetworx.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: lestw-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 07:06:57PM -0400, Ron Guerin wrote:
> Ruben Safir wrote:
> > I'm getting a little sick of the high prices I spend for
> > service with Covad, not to mention that Covad has turned
> > over to a new company, so I'm talking to Optimum-Online
> > about changing the service to them.
> >
> > They are offering 5 static IP addresses and a phone for
> > about $110 a month with a 1 year intro rate of $85.00
> > bucks a month.
> >
> > I'm particularly concerned about SORBs et al.
> >
> SORBS should be out of operation by now, they lost their host, the
> operator lost her job. If it's not gone now, it will be any day now.
>
> I'm not aware of any particular problems regarding OOL's "business"
> service in regard to spam. Of course if someone's pissed all over the
> Internet with addresses freshly recycled for you, you'll have problems.
>
> - Ron
That really sucks. SOrbs is a critical piece of infrastructure for the
internet
Ruben
|
|
