MESSAGE
DATE | 2009-07-28 |
FROM | Ruben Safir
|
SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Moving ISP Services
|
From lestw-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Tue Jul 28 19:18:35 2009 Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n6SNIX2u030171 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:18:35 -0400 Received: (from majordomo-at-localhost) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id n6SNIWTO030170 for hangout-outgoings; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:18:32 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: www2.mrbrklyn.com: majordomo set sender to lestw-hangout-at-nylxs.com using -f Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n6SNIUNZ030167 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:18:32 -0400 Received: from panix2.panix.com (panix2.panix.com [166.84.1.2]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9791F095 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:18:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by panix2.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 20529) id 4B9AC33CC8; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:18:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:18:26 -0400 From: Ruben Safir To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Moving ISP Services Message-ID: <20090728231826.GA5531-at-panix.com> References: <20090728224636.GA28668-at-panix.com> <4A6F8491.6000703-at-vnetworx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A6F8491.6000703-at-vnetworx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: lestw-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 07:06:57PM -0400, Ron Guerin wrote: > Ruben Safir wrote: > > I'm getting a little sick of the high prices I spend for > > service with Covad, not to mention that Covad has turned > > over to a new company, so I'm talking to Optimum-Online > > about changing the service to them. > > > > They are offering 5 static IP addresses and a phone for > > about $110 a month with a 1 year intro rate of $85.00 > > bucks a month. > > > > I'm particularly concerned about SORBs et al. > > > SORBS should be out of operation by now, they lost their host, the > operator lost her job. If it's not gone now, it will be any day now. > > I'm not aware of any particular problems regarding OOL's "business" > service in regard to spam. Of course if someone's pissed all over the > Internet with addresses freshly recycled for you, you'll have problems. > > - Ron
That really sucks. SOrbs is a critical piece of infrastructure for the internet
Ruben
|
|