MESSAGE
DATE | 2009-07-28 |
FROM | Ruben Safir
|
SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Eric Raymond's tips for effective open
|
From lestw-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Tue Jul 28 17:10:26 2009 Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n6SLAOai028170 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:10:26 -0400 Received: (from majordomo-at-localhost) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id n6SLAO9h028169 for hangout-outgoings; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:10:24 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: www2.mrbrklyn.com: majordomo set sender to lestw-hangout-at-nylxs.com using -f Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n6SLAMxC028166 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:10:24 -0400 Received: from panix3.panix.com (panix3.panix.com [166.84.1.3]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33D31F09C for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:10:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: by panix3.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 20529) id C66328FDE3; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:10:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:10:19 -0400 From: Ruben Safir To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Eric Raymond's tips for effective open source advocacy Message-ID: <20090728211019.GA18158-at-panix.com> References: <9e8718c60907271822k6efbd86bh3f40acb6b5511c2f-at-mail.gmail.com> <4A6E885A.5080001-at-vnetworx.net> <9e8718c60907281233r5eb1428exa3a99f7c079a5884-at-mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9e8718c60907281233r5eb1428exa3a99f7c079a5884-at-mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: lestw-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:33:42PM -0700, Joshua Zeidner wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Ron Guerin wrote: > > Joshua Zeidner wrote: > >> ? anyone hear this latest anti-OSS management mantra? > >> > >> ? "Open Source: free as in kittens." > >> > >> > > No, but that's rather disingenuous. ?Nobody has unwanted Open Source > > show up on their doorstep needing to be fixed, fed, and given a full > > round of shots, which is clearly the metaphor they're reaching for there. > > Hi Ron, > > Yes its typically used to address the fact that Open Source can > sometimes be more expensive to maintain than its proprietary > counterpart. -jmz
Which is a batant lie
> > > > > - Ron > > >
|
|