MESSAGE
| DATE | 2009-07-28 |
| FROM | Ruben Safir
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Eric Raymond's tips for effective open
|
From lestw-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Tue Jul 28 17:10:26 2009
Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n6SLAOai028170
for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:10:26 -0400
Received: (from majordomo-at-localhost)
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id n6SLAO9h028169
for hangout-outgoings; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:10:24 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: www2.mrbrklyn.com: majordomo set sender to lestw-hangout-at-nylxs.com using -f
Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n6SLAMxC028166
for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:10:24 -0400
Received: from panix3.panix.com (panix3.panix.com [166.84.1.3])
by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33D31F09C
for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:10:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by panix3.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 20529)
id C66328FDE3; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:10:19 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:10:19 -0400
From: Ruben Safir
To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Eric Raymond's tips for effective open
source advocacy
Message-ID: <20090728211019.GA18158-at-panix.com>
References: <9e8718c60907271822k6efbd86bh3f40acb6b5511c2f-at-mail.gmail.com> <4A6E885A.5080001-at-vnetworx.net> <9e8718c60907281233r5eb1428exa3a99f7c079a5884-at-mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9e8718c60907281233r5eb1428exa3a99f7c079a5884-at-mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: lestw-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:33:42PM -0700, Joshua Zeidner wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Ron Guerin wrote:
> > Joshua Zeidner wrote:
> >> ? anyone hear this latest anti-OSS management mantra?
> >>
> >> ? "Open Source: free as in kittens."
> >>
> >>
> > No, but that's rather disingenuous. ?Nobody has unwanted Open Source
> > show up on their doorstep needing to be fixed, fed, and given a full
> > round of shots, which is clearly the metaphor they're reaching for there.
>
> Hi Ron,
>
> Yes its typically used to address the fact that Open Source can
> sometimes be more expensive to maintain than its proprietary
> counterpart. -jmz
Which is a batant lie
>
> >
> > - Ron
> >
>
|
|
