|FROM ||Joshua Zeidner
|SUBJECT ||Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Eric Raymond's tips for effective open source
|From lestw-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Tue Jul 28 17:14:55 2009
Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n6SLErBi028303
for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:14:55 -0400
Received: (from majordomo-at-localhost)
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id n6SLEqfj028302
for hangout-outgoings; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:14:52 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: www2.mrbrklyn.com: majordomo set sender to lestw-hangout-at-nylxs.com using -f
Received: from mail-qy0-f176.google.com (mail-qy0-f176.google.com [220.127.116.11])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n6SLEoAa028298
for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:14:52 -0400
Received: by qyk6 with SMTP id 6so575391qyk.11
for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
Received: by 10.220.75.208 with SMTP id z16mr5406427vcj.1.1248815687283; Tue,
28 Jul 2009 14:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:14:47 -0700
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Eric Raymond's tips for effective open source
From: Joshua Zeidner
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by www2.mrbrklyn.com id n6SLEoAa028298
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Ron Guerin wrote:
> Joshua Zeidner wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Ron Guerin wrote:
>>> Joshua Zeidner wrote:
>>>> anyone hear this latest anti-OSS management mantra?
>>>> "Open Source: free as in kittens."
>>> No, but that's rather disingenuous. Nobody has unwanted Open Source
>>> show up on their doorstep needing to be fixed, fed, and given a full
>>> round of shots, which is clearly the metaphor they're reaching for there.
>> Hi Ron,
>> Yes its typically used to address the fact that Open Source can
>> sometimes be more expensive to maintain than its proprietary
>> counterpart. -jmz
> I just find it "dishonest". Yes, it can be. And tomorrow it can rain.
> Open Source is not in and of itself a seal of quality. In fact much of
> it is just as horrible as proprietary software tends to be. I can't
> think of the correct term for it, but having this kind of discussion
> with someone advancing this notion seems to be an automatic lose because
> you're then implicitly accepting the false premise upon which it is based.
> - Ron
I do agree that in the long term OSS = cost savings + better ability
to compete. Just thought I would expose this meme so that it can be
diffused as quickly as possible.