style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold'>From:size=3D2
face=3DTahoma> =
lestw-w:st=3D"on">hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com =
[mailto:lestw-w:st=3D"on">hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com] style=3D'font-weight:
bold'>On Behalf Of Simon Fondrie-Teitler

Sent: Sunday, July 26, =
2009 8:23
AM

To: w:st=3D"on">hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com

Subject: Re: [NYLXS - =
HANGOUT]
Building a Better Mouse Trap

style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'>On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Ruben Safir <href=3D"mailto:mrbrklyn-at-panix.com">mrbrklyn-at-panix.com> =
wrote:

style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'>uly 26, 2009 Scientists Worry Machines May Outsmart Man By =
JOHN

MARKOFF



A robot that can open doors and find electrical outlets to recharge

itself. Computer viruses that no one can stop. Predator drones,

which, though still controlled remotely by humans, come close to

a machine that can kill autonomously.



Impressed and alarmed by advances in artificial intelligence, a

group of computer scientists is debating whether there should be

limits on research that might lead to loss of human control over

computer-based systems that carry a growing share of society=E2s

workload, from waging war to chatting with customers on the phone.



Their concern is that further advances could create profound social

disruptions and even have dangerous consequences.



As examples, the scientists pointed to a number of technologies as

diverse as experimental medical systems that interact with patients

to simulate empathy, and computer worms and viruses that defy

extermination and could thus be said to have reached a =
=E2cockroach=E2

stage of machine intelligence.



While the computer scientists agreed that we are a long way from

Hal, the computer that took over the spaceship in =E22001: A Space

Odyssey,=E2 they said there was legitimate concern that =
technological

progress would transform the work force by destroying a widening

range of jobs, as well as force humans to learn to live with =
machines

that increasingly copy human behaviors.



The researchers =E2 leading computer scientists, artificial =
intelligence

researchers and roboticists who met at the Asilomar Conference

Grounds on Monterey =
w:st=3D"on">Bay in w:st=3D"on">California
=E2 generally discounted the

possibility of highly centralized superintelligences and the idea

that intelligence might spring spontaneously from the Internet.

But they agreed that robots that can kill autonomously are either

already here or will be soon.



They focused particular attention on the specter that criminals

could exploit artificial intelligence systems as soon as they were

developed. What could a criminal do with a speech synthesis system

that could masquerade as a human being? What happens if artificial

intelligence technology is used to mine personal information from

smart phones?



The researchers also discussed possible threats to human jobs, like

self-driving cars, software-based personal assistants and service

robots in the home. Just last month, a service robot developed by

Willow Garage in Silicon Valley =
proved it
could navigate the real

world.



A report from the conference, which took place in private on Feb.

25, is to be issued later this year. Some attendees discussed the

meeting for the first time with other scientists this month and in

interviews.



The conference was organized by the Association for the Advancement

of Artificial Intelligence, and in choosing Asilomar for the

discussions, the group purposefully evoked a landmark event in the

history of science. In 1975, the world=E2s leading biologists also

met at Asilomar to discuss the new ability to reshape life by

swapping genetic material among organisms. Concerned about possible

biohazards and ethical questions, scientists had halted certain

experiments. The conference led to guidelines for recombinant DNA

research, enabling experimentation to continue.



The meeting on the future of artificial intelligence was organized

by Eric Horvitz, a Microsoft researcher who is now president of

the association.



Dr. Horvitz said he believed computer scientists must respond to

the notions of superintelligent machines and artificial intelligence

systems run amok.



The idea of an =E2intelligence explosion=E2 in which smart machines

would design even more intelligent machines was proposed by the

mathematician I. J. Good in 1965. Later, in lectures and science

fiction novels, the computer scientist Vernor Vinge popularized

the notion of a moment when humans will create smarter-than-human

machines, causing such rapid change that the =E2human era will be

ended.=E2 He called this shift the Singularity.



This vision, embraced in movies and literature, is seen as plausible

and unnerving by some scientists like William Joy, co-founder of

Sun Microsystems. Other technologists, notably Raymond Kurzweil,

have extolled the coming of ultrasmart machines, saying they will

offer huge advances in life extension and wealth creation.



=E2Something new has taken place in the past five to eight years,=E2

Dr. Horvitz said. =E2Technologists are replacing religion, and their

ideas are resonating in some ways with the same idea of the =
Rapture.=E2



The Kurzweil version of technological utopia has captured =
imaginations

in Silicon Valley. This summer an =
organization
called the Singularity

University began offering courses to prepare a =E2cadre=E2 to shape

the advances and help society cope with the ramifications.



=E2My sense was that sooner or later we would have to make some sort

of statement or assessment, given the rising voice of the technorati

and people very concerned about the rise of intelligent machines,=E2

Dr. Horvitz said.



The A.A.A.I. report will try to assess the possibility of =E2the =
loss

of human control of computer-based intelligences.=E2 It will also

grapple, Dr. Horvitz said, with socioeconomic, legal and ethical

issues, as well as probable changes in human-computer relationships.

How would it be, for example, to relate to a machine that is as

intelligent as your spouse?



Dr. Horvitz said the panel was looking for ways to guide research

so that technology improved society rather than moved it toward a

technological catastrophe. Some research might, for instance, be

conducted in a high-security laboratory.



The meeting on artificial intelligence could be pivotal to the

future of the field. Paul Berg, who was the organizer of the 1975

Asilomar meeting and received a Nobel Prize for chemistry in 1980,

said it was important for scientific communities to engage the

public before alarm and opposition becomes unshakable.



=E2If you wait too long and the sides become entrenched like with

G.M.O.,=E2 he said, referring to genetically modified foods, =E2then

it is very difficult. It=E2s too complex, and people talk right past

each other.=E2



Tom Mitchell, a professor of artificial intelligence and machine

learning at w:st=3D"on">Carnegie
Mellon w:st=3D"on">University,
said the February meeting

had changed his thinking. =E2I went in very optimistic about the

future of A.I. and thinking that Bill Joy and Ray Kurzweil were

far off in their predictions,=E2 he said. But, he added, =E2The =
meeting

made me want to be more outspoken about these issues and in =
particular

be outspoken about the vast amounts of data collected about our

personal lives.=E2



Despite his concerns, Dr. Horvitz said he was hopeful that =
artificial

intelligence research would benefit humans, and perhaps even

compensate for human failings. He recently demonstrated a =
voice-based

system that he designed to ask patients about their symptoms and

to respond with empathy. When a mother said her child was having

diarrhea, the face on the screen said, =E2Oh no, sorry to hear =
that.=E2



A physician told him afterward that it was wonderful that the system

responded to human emotion. =E2That=E2s a great idea,=E2 Dr. Horvitz =
said

he was told. =E2I have no time for that.=E2



Ken Conley/Willow Garage