MESSAGE
DATE | 2009-07-30 |
FROM | Ron Guerin
|
SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Moving ISP Services
|
From lestw-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Thu Jul 30 15:32:34 2009 Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n6UJWWpD006069 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:32:34 -0400 Received: (from majordomo-at-localhost) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id n6UJWVJ9006068 for hangout-outgoings; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:32:31 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: www2.mrbrklyn.com: majordomo set sender to lestw-hangout-at-nylxs.com using -f Received: from broadway.vnetworx.net (broadway.vnetworx.net [69.31.43.18]) by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n6UJWTTZ006065 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:32:31 -0400 Received: (qmail 5825 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2009 19:32:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.33?) (74.73.9.208) by broadway.vnetworx.net with SMTP for ; 30 Jul 2009 19:32:20 -0000 Message-ID: <4A71F53A.6040200-at-vnetworx.net> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:32:10 -0400 From: Ron Guerin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Moving ISP Services References: <334145.44819.qm-at-web38004.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4A6FE3B6.6010309-at-vnetworx.net> <20090729081346.GA15698-at-panix.com> <4A70470B.5010909-at-vnetworx.net> <20090729134837.GA11054-at-panix.com> <4A70637B.5030309-at-vnetworx.net> <20090729173235.GA24980-at-panix.com> <4A70BF34.1000403-at-vnetworx.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: lestw-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Amy Coleman wrote: > Verizon is more exspensive than Comcast (to compare). Verizon wanted 60 > more than comcast for services. I've also heard bad things about verizon > as well. >
No need to tell us Verizon is evil. We know all about it. Comcast is too. And what would you expect? Verizon continues to reap the benefits of its formerly government sponsored monopoly, and cable franchising isn't exactly a free market either. So if you can even get the pathetic excuses for what's peddled as broadband in America, you have to choose which arm of the sleazy government coddled duopoly to deal with.
- Ron
|
|