MESSAGE
| DATE | 2009-07-30 |
| FROM | Ron Guerin
|
| SUBJECT | Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Moving ISP Services
|
From lestw-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com Thu Jul 30 15:32:34 2009
Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n6UJWWpD006069
for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:32:34 -0400
Received: (from majordomo-at-localhost)
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id n6UJWVJ9006068
for hangout-outgoings; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:32:31 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: www2.mrbrklyn.com: majordomo set sender to lestw-hangout-at-nylxs.com using -f
Received: from broadway.vnetworx.net (broadway.vnetworx.net [69.31.43.18])
by www2.mrbrklyn.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n6UJWTTZ006065
for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:32:31 -0400
Received: (qmail 5825 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2009 19:32:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.33?) (74.73.9.208)
by broadway.vnetworx.net with SMTP
for ; 30 Jul 2009 19:32:20 -0000
Message-ID: <4A71F53A.6040200-at-vnetworx.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:32:10 -0400
From: Ron Guerin
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Subject: Re: [NYLXS - HANGOUT] Moving ISP Services
References: <334145.44819.qm-at-web38004.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4A6FE3B6.6010309-at-vnetworx.net> <20090729081346.GA15698-at-panix.com> <4A70470B.5010909-at-vnetworx.net> <20090729134837.GA11054-at-panix.com> <4A70637B.5030309-at-vnetworx.net> <20090729173235.GA24980-at-panix.com> <4A70BF34.1000403-at-vnetworx.net>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: lestw-hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: hangout-at-mrbrklyn.com
Amy Coleman wrote:
> Verizon is more exspensive than Comcast (to compare). Verizon wanted 60
> more than comcast for services. I've also heard bad things about verizon
> as well.
>
No need to tell us Verizon is evil. We know all about it. Comcast is
too. And what would you expect? Verizon continues to reap the
benefits of its formerly government sponsored monopoly, and cable
franchising isn't exactly a free market either. So if you can even get
the pathetic excuses for what's peddled as broadband in America, you
have to choose which arm of the sleazy government coddled duopoly to
deal with.
- Ron
|
|
